Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 85–100 | Cite as

Young and Old Adults' Concerns About Morality and Competence

  • Oscar Ybarra
  • Emily Chan
  • Denise Park


Two experiments were conducted to examine people's sensitivity to person information from the morality domain (relation-oriented) and the competence domain (task & achievement-oriented). In a lexical decision paradigm, the findings from Experiment 1 showed that younger adults were faster to identify person cues (trait words) from the morality than from the competence domain, especially cues that were related to immorality. Experiment 2 compared the responses of younger and older adults. Despite the slower responses of the older adults, the findings indicated that all participants were faster at identifying cues from the morality domain than from the competence domain, with no age interactions. The results from Experiment 2 also suggested that disparate findings in the literature regarding reaction times to morality/competence cues and valence (positive or negative) were a function of word frequency effects. The findings are discussed in terms of people's chronic concern with the moral aspects of others as invariant across the lifespan, given that the morality domain is where interpersonal costs and threats are most likely to be signaled.


Young Adult Lexical Decision Word Frequency Person Information Frequency Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). An examination of sex differences in social support in mid and late life. Sex Roles, 17, 737-749.Google Scholar
  3. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240.Google Scholar
  4. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. NY: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Atran, S. (1988). Basic conceptual domains. Mind and Language, 3, 7-16.Google Scholar
  6. Bales, R. F. (1953). The equilibrium problem in small groups. In T. Parsons, R. F. Bales, & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bales, R. F. (1965). The equilibrium problem. In A. P. Hare, E. F. Borgatta, & R. F. Bales (Eds.), Small groups: Studies in social interaction (pp. 437-447). New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.Google Scholar
  9. Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Benet, V., & Waller, N. G. (1995). The big seven factor model of personality description. Evidence for its cross-cultural generality in a Spanish sample. Journal of Personality, 69, 701-718.Google Scholar
  12. Benne, K. D., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41-49.Google Scholar
  13. Boehm, C. (1997). Egalitarian behavior and the evolution of political intelligence. In A. Whiten & R.W. Byrne (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence II (pp. 341-364). Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bricker, A. L., Schuell, H., & Jenkins, J. J. (1964). Effect of word frequency and word length on aphasic spelling errors. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 7, 183-192.Google Scholar
  15. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Carstensen, L. L., Gross, J., & Fung, H. (1997). The social context of emotion. Annual review of geriatrics and gerontology, 17, 325-352.Google Scholar
  17. Charles, S. T., & Carstensen, L. L. (1999). The role of time in the setting of social goals across the lifespan. In T. M. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields, (Eds.), Social cognition and aging (pp. 319-342). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Craik, F. I. M., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191-211). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioral ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 282-309). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Fiedler, F. E., & Chemers, M. M. (1974). Leadership and effective management. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  22. Frieske, D. A., & Park, D. C. (1999). Memory for news in young and old adults. Psychology and Aging, 14, 90-98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordon, B., & Caramazza, A. (1982). Lexical decision for open-and closed-class words: Failure to replicate differential frequency sensitivity. Brain and Language, 15, 143-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamner, W. C., & Organ, D.W. (1978). Organizational behavior: An applied psychological approach. Dallas, TX: Business publications.Google Scholar
  25. Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review, 51, 358-374.Google Scholar
  26. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In A. W. Kruglanski and E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  27. Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401-410.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.Google Scholar
  30. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, D. J., & Markides, K. S. (1990). Activity and mortality among aged persons over an eight-year period. The Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 45, 39-42.Google Scholar
  32. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Milianti, F. J., & Cullinan, W. L. (1974). Effects of age and word frequency on object recognition and naming in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 17, 373-385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Morrell, R., & Park, D. C. (1993). Effects of age, illustrations and task variables on the performance of procedural assembly tasks. Psychology and Aging, 8, 389-399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, D. C. (2000). The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. In D. C. Park & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 3-22). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  36. Park, D. C., Davidson, N., Lautenschlager, G., Smith, A. D., Smith, P., & Hedden, T. (2000). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. (Manuscript under review, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).Google Scholar
  37. Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Lautenschlager, G., Earles, J., Frieske, D., Zwahr, M., & Gaines, C. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 621-637.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (1990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 33-60.Google Scholar
  39. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 380-391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.Google Scholar
  41. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C.,& Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968).Amulti-dimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanchez-Burks, J., Nisbett, R. E.,& Ybarra, O. (2000). Relational schemas, cultural styles and prejudice against outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 179-181.Google Scholar
  45. Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. (1998). Comparing naming. Lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1271-1281.Google Scholar
  46. Shartle, C. L. (1956). Executive performance and leadership. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.Google Scholar
  48. Skyrms, B. (1996). Evolution of the social contract. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Tagiuri, R., & Petrullo, L. (1958). Person perception and interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wentura, D., Rothermund, K.,& Bak, P. (2000). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of approach and avoidance-related social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1024-1037.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wojciszke, B. (1997). Parallels between competence-versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245-256.Google Scholar
  53. Ybarra, O. (2001). People's naive causal understanding of valenced behaviors and its implications for social information processing. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  54. Ybarra, O., & Stephan, W. G. (1996). Misanthropic person memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 691-700.Google Scholar
  55. Ybarra, O., & Stephan, W. G. (1999). Attributional orientations and the prediction of behavior: The attribution-prediction bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 718-727.Google Scholar
  56. Zahavi, A. (1993). The fallacy of conventional signaling. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 340, 227-230.Google Scholar
  57. Zwahr, M. D., Park, D. C., & Shifren, K. (1999). Judgments about estrogen replacement therapy: The role of age, cognitive abilities and beliefs. Psychology and Aging, 14, 179-191.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Ybarra
    • 1
  • Emily Chan
    • 1
  • Denise Park
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations