Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Performance in Chinese Shareholding Companies

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The corporatization reform in Chinese SOEs has been largely influenced by the Anglo-American corporate governance model, but at issues is whether or not this model suits China's current institutional and cultural contexts. Agency theory and stewardship theory are two corporate governance theories that provide conflicting assumptions about human behavior and different prescriptions about governance mechanisms. In this study we drew upon both theories and developed competing hypotheses about the relationships between board composition, leadership structure, and organizational performance in Chinese shareholding companies. We gave special attention to China's unique institutional context and its influence on board attributes. The hypotheses were tested with a sample of Chinese listed companies. Overall, the stewardship hypotheses received stronger empirical support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aharony, J., C.J. Lee, and T.J. Wong (2000). “Financial Packaging of IPO Firms in China.” Journal of Accounting Research 38(1), 103-126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C.A. and R.N. Anthony (1986). The New Corporate Directors. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliga, B.R., R.C. Moyer, and R.S. Rao (1996). “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: What's the Fuss?” Strategic Management Journal 17(1), 41-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. (1990). “The Debate Between Traditional Management Theory and Organizational Economics: Substantive Differences or Intergroup Conflict?” Academy of Management Review 15(3), 382-393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, S.W., M.W. Marr, and S. Rosenstein (1994). “Firm Performance and Board Composition: Some New Evidence.” Managerial and Decision Economics 15, 329-340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baysinger, B.D. and H.N. Butler (1985). “Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 1, 101-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M.M. (1995). “Rethinking Assumptions Behind Corporate Governance.” Challenge 38(6), 12-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, W. (1997). “Strategic Change: The Influence of Managerial Characteristics and Organizational Growth.” Academy of Management Journal 40(1), 152-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B.K. (1995). “CEO Duality and Firm Performance: A Contingency Model.” Strategic Management Journal 16(4), 301-312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadman, H.G. (1999). “The Chinese State as Corporate Shareholder.” Finance & Development 33(3), 52-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, J.W. and K.A. Hickman (1992). “Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers?” Journal of Financial Economics 32, 195-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, L. (1997). “The Models of Restructuring the Assets and Some Case Studies.” Research on Economics and Management (Jingji yu Guanli Yanjiu) 18(6), 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • China National Statistical Bureau (1996-1998). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Securities Regulatory Commission (ed.). (1997). China Securities and Futures Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, P.L., R.A. Wood, and T.B. Jones (1985). “The Composition of Boards of Directors and Incidence of Golden Parachutes.” Academy of Management Journal 28, 664-671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R.L. and K.E. Weick (1984). “Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems.” Academy of Management Review 9(2), 284-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C.M. and D.R. Dalton (1992). “The Relationship Between Governance Structure and Corporate Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms.” Journal of Business Venturing 7, 375-386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C.M. and D.R. Dalton (1993). “Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17(3), 65-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C.M. and C. Schwenk (1996). “Chief Executive Officers, Top Management Teams, and Boards of Directors: Congruent or Countervailing Forces?” Journal of Management 22(2), 185-208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily, C.M., J.L. Johnson, and D.R. Dalton (1999). “On the Measurements of Board Composition: Poor Consistency and a Serious Mismatch of Theory and Operationalization.” Decision Sciences 30(1), 83-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D.R., C.M. Daily, A.E. Ellstrand, and J.L. Johnson (1998). “Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 19(3), 269-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.F. and T.A. Thompson (1994). “A Social Movement Perspective on Corporate Control.” Administrative Science Quarterly 39, 141-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.H., F.D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson (1997). “Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management.” Academy of Management Review 22(1), 20-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G.G. and D.W. Beard (1984). “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environment.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29(1), 52-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. (1989). “CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns: Agency Theory or Stewardship Theory.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Academy of Management, Washington, DC.

  • Donaldson, L. (1990). “The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory.” Academy of Management Review 15(3), 369-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, L. and J.H. Davis (1994). “Boards and Company Performance: Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom.” Corporate Governance 2(3), 151-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). “Agency Theory: An assessment and Review.” Academy of Management Review 14(1), 57-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. (1980). “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.” Journal of Political Economy 88(2), 288-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen. (1983). “Agency Problems and Residual Claims.” Journal of Law and Economics 26(2), 327-349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. and R.A. D'Aveni (1994). “CEO Duality as a Double-edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment: Avoidance and Unity of Command.” Academy of Management Journal 37(5), 1079-1108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, S. and D.C. Hambrick (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives And Their Effects On Organizations. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D.P. and F.J. Milliken (1999). “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups.” Academy of Management Review 24(3), 489-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M.A. and R.T. Hamilton (1994). “Ownership and Diversification: Agency Theory or Stewardship Theory?” Journal of Management 31(1), 69-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, J., K. Gautam, and W. Boeker (1994). “The Effects of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change.” Strategic Management Journal 15, 241-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C.W. (1996). “In Search of Owners: Privatization and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies.” The World Bank Research Observer 11(2), 179-197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T. and J. Freeman (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.H. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E., L. Eden, C.M. Lau, and M. Wright (2000). “Strategy in Emerging Economies.” Academy of Management Journal 43(3), 249-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E., R.A. Johnson, and D.D. Moesel (1994). “Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 37(5), 1207-1251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (1994). “Board-Management Relations in Small Firms: The Paradox of Simultaneous Independence and Interdependence.” Small Business Economics 6, 55-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C.N. and D.C. King (1983). “The Effects of Representatives' Own Power Within Their Own Organization on the Outcome of a Negotiation.” Academy of Management Journal 26(1), 178-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, K. and L.W. Senbet (1998). “Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness.” Journal of Banking and Finance 22(4), 371-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., S. Smith, and B. Codling (2000). “Microprocesses of Institutional Change in the Context of Privatization.” Academy of Management Review 25(3), 572-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesner, I.F. (1987). “'Directors' Stock Ownership and Organizational Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies.” Journal of Management 13, 499-508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W. (1998). A Study on State-Owned Holding Companies. Beijing: Economic Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J.W. and E. MacIver. (1989). Pawns and Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, M.M. and L. Donaldson (1998). “Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: A Contingency Approach.” Corporate Governance 6(1), 5-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J.A., II. and S.A. Zahra (1991). “The Relative Power of CEOs and Boards of Directors: Associations with Corporate Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 12(2), 135-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J.A., II. and S.A. Zahra (1992). “Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective.” Journal of Management Studies 29(4), 411-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and G.R. Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putterman, L. (1996). “The Role of Ownership and Property Rights in China's Economic Transition.” In A.G. Walder (ed.), China's Transitional Economy. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 85-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurti, R. (2000). “A Multilevel Model of Privatization in Emerging Economies.” Academy of Management Review 25(3), 525-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstein, S. and J.G. Wyatt (1990). “Outside Directors, Board Independence, and ShareholderWealth.” Journal of Financial Economics 26, 175-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saving, J.L. (1998). “Privatization and the Transition to a Market Economy.” Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, 17(4th quarter) 17-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Stock Exchange. 1997. Shanghai Stock Exchange Statistical Annual. Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenzhen Stock Exchange. 1997. Shenzhen Stock Exchange Fact Book. Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, O.K. (1999). The Development of Corporate Governance in China. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (ed.). 1997. China's Management of Enterprise Assets: The State as Shareholder. Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokuchi, T. and W. Wang. (1994). From State-Owned Enterprises to Foreign Listed Companies: Theory and Practice. Beijing: China Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A.S. and J.L. Farh (1997). “Where Gunaxi Matters: Relational Demography and Gunaxi in the Chinese Context.” Work and Occupations 24(1), 56-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, S. (1997). “Corporate Governance: Its Scope, Concerns and Theories.” Corporate Governance 5(4), 180-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, S.C. (1964). Boards of Directors: Structures and Performance. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J.A., III., J.L. Stimpert, and E.I. Fubara (1998). “Board Composition and Organizational Performance: Two Studies of Insider/Outsider Effects.” Journal of Management Studies 35(5), 655-677.

  • Walsh, J.P. and J.K. Seward (1990). “On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms.” Academy of Management Review 15(3), 421-458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J.D. (1999). “Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties.” Academy of Management Journal 42(1), 7-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K.Y. and C.A. O'Reilly, III. (1998). “Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 years of Research.” Research in Organizational Behavior 20, 77-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1984). “Corporate Governance.” Yale Law Journal 93, 1197-1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J., J. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Wang, and Y. Ge. (1998). Strategic Restructuring of the State-Owned Economy (Guoyou Jingji de Zhanluexing Gaizu). Beijing: China Development Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, B. (1998). “Institutional Factors Influencing China's Accounting Reforms and Standards.” Accounting Horizons 12(2), 105-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Z. (1999). “Corporate Disclosures Made by Chinese Listed Companies.” The International Journal of Accounting 34(3), 349-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S.A. and J.A. Pearce, II. (1989). “Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrated Model.” Journal of Management 15(2), 291-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, E.J. and J.D. Westphal (1996). “Director Reputation, CEO-Board Power, and the Dynamics of Board Interlocks.” Administrative Science Quarterly 41(3), 507-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1999). “The Key to Successful Enterprise Reform: Effective Corporate Governance.” Economic System Reform (Jingji Tizhi Gaige) 17(2), 47-51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, People's Republic of China

    Jenny J. Tian & Chung-Ming Lau

Authors
  1. Jenny J. Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chung-Ming Lau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tian, J.J., Lau, CM. Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Performance in Chinese Shareholding Companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 18, 245–263 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010628209918

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010628209918

Search

Navigation