Agroforestry Systems

, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 85–96

Interdisciplinary analysis of homegardens in Nicaragua: micro- zonation, plant use and socioeconomic importance

  • V. E. Méndez
  • R. Lok
  • E. Somarriba
Article

Abstract

The choice of plant species, their arrangement and management varies between and within tropical homegardens in the same community. Relationships between agroecological and socioeconomic characteristics of 20 homegardens were examined at Masaya, Nicaragua. Variables analyzed were micro-zonation (area allocation to specific uses and management), plant use and diversity, occupation, labor investment, and product, benefit and income generation. Data was collected through surveys, participatory mapping, plant inventories, direct observation and interviews. Ten different micro-zones and nine plant uses were identified. Fruit trees, shaded coffee and ornamentals were the most important zones. Plant diversity was high, with a sample total of 324 species. Homegardens were an important occupation, with average labor investments of 32.6 h family−1 week−1. Families obtained at least 40 different plant products from homegardens, as well as the benefit of space for working and socializing. Six homegarden types were identified using a cluster analysis based on biophysical variables. Types reflected the relationship between income generation and the number and types of zones and plant species present. Labor inputs were high considering the small size of the homegardens (average size 3,240 m2), although no clear relationships between labor investment and plant and zone type or number were observed. Homegarden management strategies of plant selection and zonation were affected both by family choices and external forces. Although dependence on homegardens may vary according to specific conditions at a given time, they seem to be a consistent, flexible resource used to meet a diversity of needs. The methodological approach used in this paper may be appropriate for the study of other traditional agroecosystems since it includes both biophysical and socioeconomic variables, essential for understanding these complex systems.

agroecology labour inputs local knowledge tropical agroecosystems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdoellah OS (1990) Homegardens in Java and their future development. In: Landauer K and Brazil M (eds) Tropical Home Gardens, pp 69–79. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Buylla Roces ME, Lazos Chavero E and García-Barrios JR (1989) Homegardens of a humid tropical region in Southeast Mexico: an example of an agroforestry cropping system in a recently established community. Agroforestry Systems 8: 133–156Google Scholar
  3. Brierley JS (1985) West Indian kitchen gardens: a historical perspective with current insights from Grenada. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 7(3): 52–60.Google Scholar
  4. Brownrigg L (1985) Homegardening in international development: what the literature shows. League for International Food Education, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Budowski G (1990) Home gardens in tropical America: a review. In: Landauer K and Brazil M (eds) Tropical Home Gardens, pp 3–8. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, JapónGoogle Scholar
  6. Christanty L (1990) Home gardens in tropical Asia, with special reference to Indonesia. In: Landauer K and Brazil M (eds) Tropical Home Gardens, pp 9–20. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  7. Fernandes ECM and Nair PKR (1986) An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical homegardens. Agricultural Systems 21: 279–310Google Scholar
  8. Gliessman SR (1998) Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoogerbrugge ID and Fresco LO (1993) Homegarden systems: agricultural characteristics and challenges. Gatekeeper Series No. 39. IIED, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  10. Jensen M (1993a) Soil conditions, vegetation structure and biomass of a Javanese homegarden. Agroforestry Systems 24: 171–186Google Scholar
  11. Jensen M (1993b) Productivity and nutrient cycling in a Javanese homegarden. Agroforestry Systems 24: 187–201Google Scholar
  12. Jose D and Shanmugaratnam N (1993) Traditional homegardens of Kerala: a sustainable human ecosystem. Agroforestry Systems 24: 203–213Google Scholar
  13. Landauer K and Brazil M (1990a) Introduction & recommendations. In: Landauer K and Brazil M (eds) Tropical Home Gardens, pp vii–ix. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  14. Landauer K and Brazil M (eds) (1990b) Tropical Home Gardens. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  15. Lok R (ed) (1998a) Huertos caseros tradicionales de America Central: características, beneficios e importancia desde un enfoque multidisciplinario. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  16. Lok R (ed) (1998b) Huertos caseros. Módulo de Enseñanza Agroforestal 3. Serie Materiales de Enseñanza 41. Proyecto Agroforestal CATIE/GTZ. Turrialba, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  17. Méndez VE (1996) Influencia de factores socioeconómicos sobre estructuras agroecológicas de huertos caseros en Nicaragua. MSc Thesis, CATIE, Turrialba, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  18. Mergen F (1987) Research opportunities to improve the production of homegardens Agroforestry Systems 5: 57–67Google Scholar
  19. Nair PKR (1993) An Introduction to Agroforestry. pp 85–97. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  20. Niñez V (1987) Household gardens: theoretical and policy considerations. Agricultural Systems 23: 167–186Google Scholar
  21. Okigbo BN (1990) Homegardens in tropical Africa. In: Landauer K and Brazil M (eds) Tropical Home Gardens, pp 41–65. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  22. Padoch C and De Jong W (1991) The house gardens of Santa Rosa: diversity and variability in an amazonian agricultural system. Economic Botany 45(2): 161–175Google Scholar
  23. SAS Institute (1987) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers: version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Torquebiau E (1992) Are tropical agroforestry home gardens sustainable? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 41: 189–207Google Scholar
  25. Wojtkowski PA (1993) Toward an understanding of tropical home gardens. Agroforestry Systems 24: 215–222Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. E. Méndez
    • 1
  • R. Lok
    • 2
  • E. Somarriba
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Studies DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.CATIE 7170TurrialbaCosta Rica
  3. 3.Agroforestería, CATIE 7170TurrialbaCosta Rica

Personalised recommendations