Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro

  • Shin Watanabe
  • Katsumi Kojima
  • Yuji Ide
  • Satohiko Sasaki


The use of in vitro shoot cultures to evaluate osmotic and salt tolerance and the effects of salt and mannitol in the medium on proline and sugar accumulation were investigated in two poplar species, P. euphratica and P. alba cv. Pyramidalis × P. tomentosa. Shoot length, leaf number, whole plant dry weight, and the accumulation of proline and total soluble sugars in leaves were quantified after 2 weeks. All P. euphratica plantlets survived at all levels of mannitol and NaCl, while the mortality of P. alba cv. Pyramidalis × P. tomentosa increased both at the mannitol and the NaCl treatments. A significant increase in proline accumulation was observed in both young and mature P. euphratica leaves at 200 mM mannitol and above, and at 150 mM NaCl and above. The total soluble sugar content increased in young P. euphratica leaves at 250 mM NaCl; however, it decreased in the mature leaves. Similar increases of the total soluble sugar content were not seen in P. alba cv. Pyramidalis × P. tomentosa plants in response to either mannitol or NaCl treatment. Our results suggest that accumulated proline and sugars promote osmotic and salt tolerance. The effects of accumulated proline and total soluble sugars on leaves are discussed in relation to growth and osmotic adjustment.

drought tolerance in vitro culture osmotic adjustment Populus alba cv. Pyramidalis × Populus tomentosa Populus euphratica salt tolerance 


  1. Ackerson RC (1981) Osmoregulation in cotton in response to water stress. II. Leaf carbohydrate status in relation to osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiol. 67: 489–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates LS, Waldren RP & Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218: 443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Browicz K (1977) Chorology of Populus euphratica Olivier. Arboretum Kornickie 22: 5–27Google Scholar
  5. Cano EA, Perez-Alfocea F, Moreno V, Caro M & Bolarin MC (1998) Evaluation of salt tolerance in cultivated and wild tomato species through in vitro shoot apex culture. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 53: 19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gebre GM, Brandle JR & Kuhns MR (1997) Influence of rewatering and time of sampling on solute accumulation of two Populus deltoides clones. Tree Physiol. 17: 341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA & Handa AK (1986) Cellular mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Hortscience 26: 1317–1324Google Scholar
  8. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu J-K & Bohnart HJ (2000) Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51: 463–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hou HU (1985) Floodplain meadows, gallery forests, and oases. In: Goodin JR & Northington DK (eds) Plant Resource of Arid and Semi Arid Lands – A Global Perspective (pp 246–249). Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  10. Irigoyen JJ, Emerich DW & Sanchez-Diaz M (1992) Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiol. Plant. 84: 55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kang J-M, Kojima K & Ide Y (1992) Establishment of tissue culture system of Chinese poplars: Populus tomentosa and Populus alba cv. Pyramidalis x Populus tomentosa. Bull. Tokyo Univ. For. 88: 127–133Google Scholar
  12. Kang J-M, Kojima K, Ide Y & Sasaki S (1996) Growth response to the stress of low osmotic potential, salinity and high pH in cultured shoot of Chinese poplars. J. For. Res. 1: 27–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee RB, Ratcliffe RG & Southon TE (1990) 31P NMR measurements of the cytoplasmic and vacuolar Pi content of mature maize roots: relationships with phosphorus status and phosphate fluxes. J. Exp. Bot. 41: 1063–1078Google Scholar
  14. Ma C, Fung L, Wang S & Huttermann A (1997) Photosynthetic response of Populus euphratica to salt stress. For. Ecol. Manage. 93: 56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morgan JM (1984) Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 35: 299–319Google Scholar
  16. Morgan JM (1992) Osmotic components and properties associated with genotypic differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 19: 67–76Google Scholar
  17. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Myers AB & Neales FT (1986) Osmotic adjustment, induced by drought, in seedlings of three Eucalyptus species. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13: 597–603Google Scholar
  19. Nabil M & Coudret A (1995) Effects of sodium on growth, tissue elasticity and solute adjustment in two Acacia nilotica subspecies. Physiol. Plant. 93: 217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rascio A, Plantani C, Sealfati G, Tonti A & Di Fonzo N (1994) The accumulation of solutes and water binding strength in durum wheat. Physiol. Plant. 90: 554–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tschaplinski TJ & Tuskan GA (1993) Water-stress tolerance of black and eastern cottonwood clones and four hybrid progeny. II. Metabolites and inorganic ions that constitute osmotic adjustment. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 681–687Google Scholar
  22. Turner NC, Begg JE & Tonnet ML (1978) Osmotic adjustment of sorghum and sunflower crops in response to water deficits and its influence on the water potential at which stomata close. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5: 597–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang L, Yang D & Zhang L (1997) The photosynthetic characteristics of differently shaped leaves in Populus euphratica Olivier. Photosynthetica 34: 545–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Watanabe Sadamoto (1991) Preliminary report of afforestational strategy in Urumqi and adjacent areas, Xinjang, China. In: Environmental Assessment Center (ed) Report of Inspection on Natural Resources and Their Utilization in Urmuqi City (pp 45–55). Environmental Assessment Center, Shizuoka, JapanGoogle Scholar
  25. Watanabe Shin, Kojima K, Ide Y & Sasaki S (1999) Establishment of a tissue culture system of Populus euphratica Oliv. Bull. Tokyo Univ. For. 102: 87–92Google Scholar
  26. Winter H, Robinson DG & Heldt HW (1993) Subcellular volumes and metabolite concentrations in barley leaves. Planta 191: 180–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wo W (1989) The utilization of water resources of the Tarim River and the change of environment. In: The Papers of the International Association Hydraulic XXIII Congress, Ottawa (pp 145–149).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shin Watanabe
    • 1
  • Katsumi Kojima
    • 2
    • 2
  • Yuji Ide
    • 1
  • Satohiko Sasaki
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Asian Natural Environmental Science CenterThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.College of Bioresource SciencesNihon UniversityFujisawaJapan

Personalised recommendations