Climatic Change

, Volume 50, Issue 1–2, pp 143–175

Hydrologic Sensitivity of Global Rivers to Climate Change

  • Bart Nijssen
  • Greg M. O'Donnell
  • Alan F. Hamlet
  • Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Article

Abstract

Climate predictions from four state-of-the-art general circulation models (GCMs) were used to assess the hydrologic sensitivity to climate change of nine large, continental river basins (Amazon, Amur, Mackenzie, Mekong, Mississippi, Severnaya Dvina, Xi, Yellow, Yenisei). The four climate models (HCCPR-CM2, HCCPR-CM3, MPI-ECHAM4, and DOE-PCM3) all predicted transient climate response to changing greenhouse gas concentrations, and incorporated modern land surface parameterizations. Model-predicted monthly average precipitation and temperature changes were downscaled to the river basin level using model increments (transient minus control) to adjust for GCM bias. The variable infiltration capacity (VIC) macroscale hydrological model (MHM) was used to calculate the corresponding changes in hydrologic fluxes (especially streamflow and evapotranspiration) and moisture storages. Hydrologic model simulations were performed for decades centered on 2025 and 2045. In addition, a sensitivity study was performed in which temperature and precipitation were increased independently by 2 °C and 10%, respectively, during each of four seasons. All GCMs predict a warming for all nine basins, with the greatest warming predicted to occur during the winter months in the highest latitudes. Precipitation generally increases, but the monthly precipitation signal varies more between the models than does temperature. The largest changes in the hydrological cycle are predicted for the snow-dominated basins of mid to higher latitudes. This results in part from the greater amount of warming predicted for these regions, but more importantly, because of the important role of snow in the water balance. Because the snow pack integrates the effects of climate change over a period of months, the largest changes occur in early to mid spring when snow melt occurs. The climate change responses are somewhat different for the coldest snow dominated basins than for those with more transitional snow regimes. In the coldest basins, the response to warming is an increase of the spring streamflow peak, whereas for the transitional basins spring runoff decreases. Instead, the transitional basins have large increases in winter streamflows. The hydrological response of most tropical and mid-latitude basins to the warmer and somewhat wetter conditions predicted by the GCMs is a reduction in annual streamflow, although again, considerable disagreement exists among the different GCMs. In contrast, for the high-latitude basins increases in annual flow volume are predicted in most cases.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdulla, F. A., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Smith, J. A.: 1996, ‘Application of a Macroscale Hydrologic Model to Estimate theWater Balance of the Arkansas-Red River Basin’,J. Geophys. Res. 101,7449–7459.Google Scholar
  2. Arnell, N. W.: 1999a, ‘The Effect of Climate Change on Hydrological Regimes in Europe: A Continental Perspective’,Global Environ. Change 9,5–23.Google Scholar
  3. Arnell, N. W.: 1999b, ‘Climate Change and Global Water Resources’,Global Environ. Change 9, S31–S49.Google Scholar
  4. Batjes, N. H.: 1995, A Homogenized Soil Data File for Global Environmental Research: A Subset of FAO, ISRIC and NCRS Profiles,Technical Report,International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC), Wageningen.Google Scholar
  5. Battisti, D. and Sarachik, E.: 1995, ‘Understanding and Predicting ENSO’,Rev. Geophys. 33, 1367–1376.Google Scholar
  6. Boer, G. J., Flato, G., and Ramsden, D.: 2000a, ‘A Transient Climate Change Simulation with Greenhouse Gas and Aerosol Forcing: Projected Climate to the Twenty-First Century, Clim. Dyn. 16, 427–450.Google Scholar
  7. Boer, G. J., Flato, G., Reader, M. C., and Ramsden, D.: 2000b, ‘A Transient Climate Change Simulation with Greenhouse Gas and Aerosol Forcing: Experimental Design and Comparison with the Instrumental Record for the Twentieth Century’, Clim. Dyn. 16,405–425.Google Scholar
  8. Bras, R. A.: 1990, Hydrology, an Introduction to Hydrologic Science,AddisonWesley, Inc., Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Chao, P.: 1999, ‘Great Lakes Water Resources: Climate Change Impact Analysis with Transient GCM Scenarios’, J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1485–1499.Google Scholar
  10. Cherkauer, K. A. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 1999, ‘Hydrologic Effects of Frozen Soils in the Upper Mississippi River Basin’, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 19,599–19,610.Google Scholar
  11. Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G.M., Clapp, R. B., and Ginn, T. R.: 1984, ‘A Statistical Exploration of the Relationships of Soil Moisture Characteristics to the Physical Properties of Soils’,Water Resour. Res. 20,682–690.Google Scholar
  12. Doherty, R. and Mearns, L.: 1999, Comparison of Simulations of Current Climate from Two Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean Global Climate Models against Observations and Evaluation of their Future Climates,Report to the National Institute for Global Environmental Change,Technical Report, NCAR.Google Scholar
  13. Emori, S., Nozawa, T., Abe-Ouchi, A., Numaguti, A., Kimoto, M., and Nakajima, T.:1999, ‘Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model Experiments of Future Climate Change with an Explicit Representation of Sulfate Aerosol Scattering’,J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 77,1299–1307.Google Scholar
  14. FAO: 1995,The Digital Soil Map of the World, version 3.5.Google Scholar
  15. Felzer, B. and Heard, P.: 1999, ‘Precipitation Differences amongst GCMs Used for the U.S. National Assessment’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35, 1327–1340.Google Scholar
  16. Frederick, K. D. and Schwarz, G. E.: 1999, ‘Socioeconomic Impacts of Climate Change on U.S. Water Supplies,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1563–1584.Google Scholar
  17. Gan, T. Y.: 1998, ‘Hydroclimatic Trends and Possible Climatic Warming in the Canadian Prairies’, Water Resour. Res. 34,3009–3015.Google Scholar
  18. Genta, J. L., Perez-Iribarren, G., and Mechoso, C. R.: 1998, ‘A Recent Increasing Trend in the Streamflow of Rivers in Southeastern South America’,J. Climate 11,2858–2862.Google Scholar
  19. Glanz, M., Katz, R., and Nicholls N. (eds.): 1991, Teleconnections Linking Worldwide Climate Anomalies,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  20. Gleick, P. H.: 1999, ‘Studies from the Water Sector of the National Assessment’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1297–1300.Google Scholar
  21. Gleick, P. H. and Chalecki, E. L.: 1999, ‘The Impacts of Climatic Changes for Water Resources of the Colorado and Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35, 1429–1442.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C., Banks, H., Gregory, J., Johns, T., Mitchell, J., and Wood, R.: 2000, ‘The Simulation of SST, Sea Ice Extents and Ocean Heat Transports in a Version of the Hadley Centre Coupled Model without Flux Adjustments’,Clim. Dyn. 16, 147–168.Google Scholar
  23. Gordon, H. B. and O'Farrell, S. P.: 1997, ‘Transient Climate Change in the CSIRO Coupled Model with Dynamic Sea Ice’,Mon. Wea. Rev. 125,875–907.Google Scholar
  24. Grabs, W. E., Portmann, F., and De Couet, T.:2000, ‘Discharge Observation Networks in Arctic Regions: Computation of the River Runoff into the Arctic Ocean, Its Seasonality and Variability’, in Lewis, E. L., Jones, E. P., Lemke, P., Prowse, T. D., and Wadhams, P. (eds.), The Freshwater Budget of the Arctic Ocean,NATO ARW,Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 249–267.Google Scholar
  25. Graham, S. T., Famiglietti, J. S., and Maidment, D. R.: 1999, ‘5-Minute, 1/2°, and 1° Data Sets of Continental Watersheds and River Networks for Use in Regional and Global Hydrologic and Climate System Modeling Studies’,Water Resour. Res. 35,583–587.Google Scholar
  26. Hamlet, A. F. and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 1999, ‘Effects of Climate Change on Hydrology and Water Resources in the Columbia River Basin’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1597–1623.Google Scholar
  27. Hansen, M. C., DeFries, R. S., Townshend, J. R. G., and Sohlberg, R.: 2000, ‘Global Land Cover Classification at 1 km Spatial Resolution Using a Classification Tree Approach’, Int. J. Remote Sens. 21,1331–1364.Google Scholar
  28. Huffman, G. J. et al.: 1997, ‘The Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Combined Precipitation Dataset’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 78,5–20.Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, J., Lettenmaier, D., and Guttorp, P.: 1993, ‘A Stochastic Approach for Assessing the Effects of Changes in Regional Circulation Patterns on Local Precipitation’,Water Resour. Res. 29, 3303–3315.Google Scholar
  30. Hulme, M.: 1995, ‘Estimating Global Changes in Precipitation’, Weather 50,34–42.Google Scholar
  31. IPCC: 1996, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  32. Johns, T. C., Carnell, R. E., Crossley, J. F., Gregory, J. M., Mitchell, J. F. B., Senior, C. A., Tett, S. F. B., and Wood, R. A.: 1997, ‘The Second Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere GCM: Model Description, Spinup and Validation’,Clim. Dyn. 13, 103–134.Google Scholar
  33. Jones, P. D.: 1994, ‘Hemispheric Surface Air Temperature Variations: A Reanalysis and an Update to 1993’,J. Climate 7, 1794–1802.Google Scholar
  34. Kalnay, E. et al.: 1996, ‘The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 77,437–471.Google Scholar
  35. Kimball, J. S., Running, S. W., and Nemani, R. R.: 1997, ‘An Improved Method for Estimating Surface Humidity from Daily Minimum Temperature’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 85,87–98.Google Scholar
  36. Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Evans, J. R., Goulding, K., Jarvis, P. G., Noble, I. R., Rounsevell, M., and Sharkey, T. D.: 1996, ‘Ecophysiological, Ecological, and Soil Processes in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Primer on General Concepts and Relationships’, in Watson, R. T., Zinyowera, M. C., and Moss, R. H. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses; Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  37. Lettenmaier, D. P. and Gan, T. Y.: 1990, ‘Hydrologic Sensitivities of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basin, California, to Global Warming’, Water Resour. Res. 26,69–86.Google Scholar
  38. Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, A. W., Palmer, R. N., Wood, E. F., and Stakhiv, E. Z.: 1999, ‘Water Resources Implications of Global Warming: A U.S. Regional Perspective’, Clim. Change 43, 537–579.Google Scholar
  39. Leung, L. R. and Wigmosta, M. S.: 1999, ‘Potential Climate Change Impacts on Mountain Watersheds in the Pacific Northwest’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1463–1472.Google Scholar
  40. Leung, L. R., Hamlet, A. F., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Kumar, A.: 1999, ‘Simulations of the ENSO Hydroclimate Signals in the Pacific Northwest Columbia River Basin’,Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 80, 2313–2329.Google Scholar
  41. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Wood, E. F.:1996, ‘One-Dimensional Statistical Dynamic Representation of Subgrid Spatial Variability of Precipitation in the Two-Layer Variable Infiltration Capacity Model’,J. Geophys. Res. 101,21,403–21,422.Google Scholar
  42. Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., and Burges, S. J.: 1994, ‘A Simple Hydrologically Based Model of Land Surface Water and Energy Fluxes for General Circulation Models’,J. Geophys. Res. 99,14,415–14,428.Google Scholar
  43. Lins, H. F. and Slack, J. R.: 1999, ‘Streamflow Trends in the United States’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 26,227–230.Google Scholar
  44. Lohmann, D., Nolte-Holube, R., and Raschke, E.: 1996, ‘A Large-Scale Horizontal Routing Model to Be Coupled to Land Surface Parametrization Schemes’,Tellus 48A,708–721.Google Scholar
  45. Lohmann, D., Raschke, E., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 1998a, ‘Regional Scale Hydrology: I. Formulation of the VIC-2L Model Coupled to a Routing Model’,Hydrol. Sci. J. 43, 131–141.Google Scholar
  46. Lohmann, D., Raschke, E., Nijssen, B., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 1998b, ‘Regional Scale Hydrology: II. Application of the VIC-2L Model to the Weser River, Germany’, Hydrol. Sci. J. 43,143–158.Google Scholar
  47. Manabe, S., Stouffer, R. J., Spelman, M. J., and Bryan, K.: 1991, ‘Transient Responses of a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Gradual Changes of Atmospheric CO2, Part I: Annual Mean Response’,J. Climate 4,785–818.Google Scholar
  48. Marengo, J., Tomasella, J., and Uvo, C. R.: 1998, ‘Trends in Streamflow and Rainfall in Tropical South America: Amazonia, Eastern Brazil, and Northwestern Peru’,J. Geophys. Res. 103, 1775–1783.Google Scholar
  49. Matheussen, B., Kirschbaum, R. L., Goodman, I. A., O'Donnell, G. M., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: 2000, ‘Effects of Land Cover Change on Streamflow in the Interior Columbia River Basin (U.S.A. and Canada)’, Hydrol. Process. 14,867–885.Google Scholar
  50. Melillo, J. M., Prentice, I. C., Farquhar, G. D., Schulze, E.-D., and Sala, O. E.: 1996, ‘Terrestrial Biotic Responses to Environmental Change and Feedbacks to Climate’, in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp. 445–481.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, N., Kim, J. H. R. K., and Farrara, J.: 1999, ‘Downscaled Climate and Streamflow Study of the Southwestern United States’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1525–1538.Google Scholar
  52. Nicholls, N., Gruza, G. V., Jouzel, J., Karl, T. R., Ogallo, L. A., and Parker, D. E.: 1996, ‘Observed Climate Variability and Change’, in Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.), Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., pp.133–192.Google Scholar
  53. Nijssen, B., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., Wetzel, S. W., and Wood, E. F.: 1997, ‘Streamflow Simulation for Continental-Scale River Basins’, Water Resour. Res. 33, 711–724.Google Scholar
  54. Nijssen, B., O'Donnell, G. M., Lettenmaier, D. P., Lohmann, D., and Wood, E. F.: 2001a, ‘Predicting the Discharge of Global Rivers’,J. Climate, accepted.Google Scholar
  55. Nijssen, B., Schnur, R., and Lettenmaier, D. P.:2001b, ‘Global Retrospective Estimation of Soil Moisture Using the VIC Land Surface Model, 1980–1993’,J. Climate 14,1790–1808.Google Scholar
  56. Ojima, D., Garcia, L., Elgaali, E., Miller, K., Kittel, T. G. F., and Lackett, J.: 1999, ‘Potential Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources in the Great Plains’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35, 1443–1455.Google Scholar
  57. Olsen, J., Stedinger, J., Matalas, N., and Stakhiv, E.: 1999, ‘Climate Variability and Flood Frequency Estimation for the Upper Mississippi and Lower Missouri Rivers’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1509–1523.Google Scholar
  58. Robertson, A. W. and Mechoso, C. R.: 1998, ‘Interannual and Decadal Cycles in River Flows of Southeasterm South America’,J. Climate 11,2570–2581.Google Scholar
  59. Röckner, E., Bengtsson, L., Feichter, J., Lelieveld, J., and Rodhe, H.: 1999, ‘Transient Climate Change Simulations with a Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean GCMIncluding the Tropospheric Sulfur Cycle’, J. Climate 12, 3004–3032.Google Scholar
  60. Röckner, E. et al.: 1996, The Atmospheric General Circulation Model ECHAM-4: Model Description and Simulation of Present-Day Climate,Technical Report 218,Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  61. Row, L. W., Hastings, D. A., and Dunbar, P. K.: 1995, TerrainBase Worldwide Digital Terrain Data Documentation Manual, National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  62. Salas, J. D.: 1993, ‘Analysis and Modeling of Hydrologic Time Series’, in Maidment, D. R. (ed.), Handbook of Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, pp. 19.1–19.72.Google Scholar
  63. Simpson, H., Cane, M., Lin, S., Zebiak, S., and Herczeg, A.: 1993, ‘Forecasting Annual Discharge of River Murray, Australia, from a Geophysical Model of Enso’,J. Climate 6,386–390.Google Scholar
  64. Stouffer, R. J. and Manabe, S.: 1999, ‘Response of a Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Sensitivity to the Rate of Increase’,J. Climate 12, 2224–2237.Google Scholar
  65. Thiaw, W. M., Barnston, A. G., and Kumar, V.:1999, ‘Predictions of African Rainfall on the Seasonal Timescale’, J. Geophys. Res. 104, 31,589–31,597.Google Scholar
  66. Thornton, P. E. and Running, S. W.: 1999, ‘An Improved Algorithm for Estimating Incident Daily Solar Radiation from Measurements of Temperature, Humidity, and Precipitation’,Agric. For. Meteorol. 93, 211–228.Google Scholar
  67. Vörösmarty, C. J., Fekete, B. M., and Tucker, B. A.: 1998, ‘Global River Discharge Database (RivDis) v. 1.1’, online at http://www-eosdis.ornl.gov or on CD-ROM from the ORNL Distributed Active Archive Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  68. Vörösmarty, C. J., Green, P., Salisbury, J., and Lammers, R. B.: 2000, ‘Global Water Resources: Vulnerability from Climate Change and Population Growth’,Science 289,284–288.Google Scholar
  69. Washington, W. M. et al.: 2000, ‘Parallel Climate Model (PCM) Control and Transient Simulations’, Clim. Dyn. 16,755–774.Google Scholar
  70. Wolock, D. and McCabe, G.: 1999, ‘Estimates of Runoff Using Water-Balance and Atmospheric General Circulation Models’,J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc. 35,1341–1350.Google Scholar
  71. Wood, E. F., Lettenmaier, D. P., Liang, X., Nijssen, B., and Wetzel, S. W.: 1997, ‘Hydrological Modeling of Continental-Scale Basins’,Ann. Rev. Earth Pl. Sc. 25,279–300. Also appeared in Dietrich, W. E. and Sposito, G. (eds.), Hydrological Processes, from Catchment to Continental Scales, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 313–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bart Nijssen
    • 1
  • Greg M. O'Donnell
    • 1
  • Alan F. Hamlet
    • 1
  • Dennis P. Lettenmaier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations