Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance
- 659 Downloads
Empirical evidence presented in this paper shows that the utmost care must be taken ininterpreting bibliometric data in a comparative evaluation of national research systems. From theresults of recent studies, the authors conclude that the value of impact indicators of researchactivities at the level of an institution or a country strongly depend upon whether one includes orexcludes research publications in SCI covered journals written in other languages than in English.Additional material was gathered to show the distribution of SCI papers among publicationlanguages. Finally, the authors make suggestions for further research on how to deal with this typeof problems in future national research performance studies.
KeywordsEmpirical Evidence Research System Research Performance Comparative Evaluation Performance Study
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.R. M. May, The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275 (Feb 7) (1997) 793-796.Google Scholar
- 2.E. Garfield, English–An international language for science, The Information Scientist, Dec 76, In: Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 1, pp. 19-20, ISI Press.Google Scholar
- 3.T. N. van Leeuwen, H. F. Moed, R. J. W. Tijssen, M. S. Visser, A. F. J. van Raan, First Evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems, Research Evaluation, Vol. 9, August 2000, 155-156.Google Scholar
- 4.H. F. Moed, R. E. de Bruin, Th. N. Van Leeuwen, New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: database description, overview of indicators and first applications, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 381-422.Google Scholar
- 5.A. F. J. van Raan, Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 397-420.Google Scholar