What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials
- 1.5k Downloads
German sentences which were either correct, contained a selectional restriction violation, or a word category violation were presented auditorily to 16 native speakers of German (L1 group) and to 16 native speakers of Russian, who had learned German after the age of 10 (L2 group). Semantic violations elicited an N400 effect for both groups, but with a reduced amplitude and a longer peak latency in the L2 group. Compared to correct sentences, sentences with a phrase structure violation elicited an early anterior negativity followed by a broad centro-parietal positivity in native speakers. By contrast, there was no differential modulation of the early anterior negativity in the L2 group. A late positivity was also elicited in the second language learners, but it was slightly delayed compared to that shown by native speakers. This pattern is discussed in terms of different degrees of automaticity with respect to the subprocesses involved in sentence comprehension.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brown, C., Hagoort, P., & Kutas, M. (2000). Postlexical integration processes in language comprehension: Evidence from brain-imaging research. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 881–895). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Friederici, A. D. (1999). The neurobiology of language processing. In A. D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (pp. 265–304). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1998) ERP-evidence for autonomous first-pass parsing processes in auditory language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Supplement, p. 125.Google Scholar
- Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 193–204.Google Scholar
- Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (in press). Processing a second language: Late learners comprehension mechanisms as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.Google Scholar
- Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (submitted). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as revealed by ERPs. Manuscript submitted.Google Scholar
- Isel, F., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2000, September). Auditory processing of German sentences by French late bilinguals. Poster presented at the Conference of Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing (Amlap), Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Kim, K. H. S., Relkin, N. R., Lee, K. M., & Hirsch, J. (1997). Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature (London), 388, 171–174.Google Scholar
- Kutas, M., & Van Petten, C. (1994). Psycholinguistics electrified. Event-related brain potential investigations. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 83–143). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Osterhout, L. & McLaughlin, J. (2000). What brain activity can tell us about second-language learning. Paper presented at the CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, La Jolla, California.Google Scholar
- Rugg, M. D., & Coles, M. G. H. (Eds.). (1995). Electrophysiology of mind: Event-related brain potentials and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Weber-Fox, C., & Neville, H. J. (1996). Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 231–256.Google Scholar