Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 30, Issue 5, pp 561–575 | Cite as

School-Related Stress Experience as a Risk Factor for Bullying Behavior

  • Gerd Karin Natvig
  • Grethe Albrektsen
  • Ulla Qvarnstrøm
Article

Abstract

Associations between bullying behavior and school-related stress experience, self-efficacy, social support, and decision control were explored in a study of 885 Norwegian adolescents aged 13–15 years. Information was based on self-reports. The psychosocial factors were represented by an average of scores on 3–12 single items, each with 5 possible response categories. Bullying behavior was defined as bullying other pupils sometimes or more often during the term. The prevalence of bullying behavior was 9.2%, but significantly higher among boys than girls. Odds ratios of bullying behavior according to psychosocial factors were calculated in a multiple logistic regression analysis. Increasing school alienation was associated with an increased risk of bullying, whereas increasing support from teachers and peers decreased the risk. Increasing self-efficacy was associated with a significant increase in risk only among 14-year-old pupils, but a similar tendency was seen for 15-year-old pupils. No significant association was seen with decision control.

Keywords

Regression Analysis Logistic Regression Social Support Logistic Regression Analysis Response Category 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 84(3): 261–271.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy, The Exercise of Control. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Batsche, G. M., and Knoff, H. M. (1994). Bullies and their victims: Understanding a pervasive problem in the sch. Sch Psychol. Rev. 23(2): 165–174.Google Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., and Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychol. Rev. 103(1): 5–33.Google Scholar
  5. Bijttebier, P., and Vertommen, H. (1998). Coping with peer arguments in school-age children with bully/victim problems. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 387–394.Google Scholar
  6. Boulton, M. J. (1997). Teachers' views on bullying: Definitions, attitudes and ability to cope. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 67: 223–233.Google Scholar
  7. Boulton, M. J., and Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 62: 73–87.Google Scholar
  8. Bru, E., Boyesen, M., Munthe, E., and Roland, E. (1998). Perceived social support at school and emotional and musculoskeletal complaints among Norwegian 8th grade students. Scand. J. Educ. Res. 42(4): 339–355.Google Scholar
  9. Craig,W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Person. Individ. Diff. 24(1): 123–130.Google Scholar
  10. DuBois, D. L., Bull, C. A., Sherman, M. D., and Roberts, M. (1998). Self-esteem and adjustment in early adolescence: A social-contextual perspective. J. Youth Adolesc. 27(5): 557–583.Google Scholar
  11. Eslea, M., and Smith, P. K. (1998). The long-term effectiveness of anti-bullying work in primary schools. Educ. Res. 40(2): 203–218.Google Scholar
  12. Genta, M. L., Menesini, E., Fonzi, A., Costabile, A., and Smith, P. K. (1996). Bullies and victims in schools in central and southern Italy. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. XI(1): 97–110.Google Scholar
  13. Green, L. W., and Kreuter, M. W. (1991). Health Promotion Planning. An Educational and Environmental Approach (2nd edn.). Mayfield, Mountain View.Google Scholar
  14. Grubbs, S., Hardin, S. B., Weinrich, S., Weinrich, M., Garrison, C., Pesut, D., and Hardin, T. (1992). Self-efficacy in normal adolescents. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 13: 121–128.Google Scholar
  15. Hughes, J. N., Cavell, T. A., and Grossman, P. B. (1997). A positive view of self: Risk or protection for aggressive children? Dev. Psychopathol. 9: 75–94.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Dudley, B., Ward, M., and Magnuson, D. (1995). The impact of peer mediation training on the management of school and home conflicts. Am. Educ. Res. J. 32(4): 829–844.Google Scholar
  17. Karasek, R., and Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Lazarus, R. S., and Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, T. J., Sugai, G., and Colvin, G. (1998). Reducing problem behavior through a school-wide system of effective behavioral support: Investigation of a school-wide social skills training program and contextual interventions. Sch. Psychol. Rev. 27(3): 446–459.Google Scholar
  20. Mau, R. Y. (1992). The validity and devolution of a concept: Student alienation. Adolescence, 27(107): 731–741.Google Scholar
  21. Mynard, H., and Joseph, S. (1997). Bully/victim problems and their association with Eysenck's personality dimensions in 8 to 13 year-olds. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 67: 51–54.Google Scholar
  22. Natvig, G. K., Albrektsen, G., Anderssen, N., and Qvarnstrøm, U. (1999). School-related stress and psychosomatic symptoms among school adolescents. J. Sch. Health 69(9): 362–368.Google Scholar
  23. Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. XII(4): 495–510.Google Scholar
  24. Ozer, E. M., and Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: A self-efficacy analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 58(3): 472–486.Google Scholar
  25. Pakaslahti, L., and Keltikangas-Jarvinen, L. (1998). Types of aggressive behavior among aggressive preferred, aggressive non-preferred, non-aggressive preferred and non-aggressive non-preferred 14-year-old adolescents. Person. Individ. Diff. 24(6): 821–828.Google Scholar
  26. Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., and Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Dev. Psychol. 24(6): 807–814.Google Scholar
  27. Pulkkinen, L., and Tremblay, R. E. (1992). Patterns of boys' social adjustment in two cultures and at different ages: A longitudinal perspective. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 15(4): 527–553.Google Scholar
  28. Rigby, K. (1998). The relationship between reported health and involvement in bully/victim problems among male and female secondary schoolchildren. J. Health Psychol. 3(4): 465–476.Google Scholar
  29. Rigby, K., Cox, I., and Black, G. (1997). Cooperativeness and bully/victim problems among Australian schoolchildren. J. Soc. Psychol. 137(3): 357–368.Google Scholar
  30. Rigby, K., and Slee, P. T. (1993). Dimensions of interpersonal relation among Australian children and implications for psychological well-being. J. Soc. Psychol. 133(1): 33–42.Google Scholar
  31. Salmivalli, C., Huttunen, A., and Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1997). Peer networks and bullying in schools. Scand. J. Psychol. 38: 305–312.Google Scholar
  32. Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., and Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1996). How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behav. 22: 99–109.Google Scholar
  33. Sharp, S., and Smith, P. K. (1991). Bullying in the UK schools: The DES Sheffield Bullying Project. Early Child Dev. Care. 77: 47–55.Google Scholar
  34. Siann, G., Callaghan, M., Lockhart, R., and Rawson, L. (1993). Bullying: Teachers' views and school effects. Educ. Stud. 19(3): 307–321.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, P. K. (1997). Bullying in schools: The UK experience and the Sheffield Anti-bullying project. Ir. J. Psychhol. 18(2): 191–201.Google Scholar
  36. Whitney, I., and Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educ. Res. 35(1): 3–25.Google Scholar
  37. WHO. (1993). The European Network of Health Promoting Schools. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  38. Wiedenfelt, S. A., Bandura, A., Levine, S., O'Leary, A., Brown, S., and Raska, K. (1990). Impact of perceived self-efficacy in coping with stressors on components of the immune system. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 59(5): 1082–1094.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, T., and Jones, H. (1993). School health education in the European Community. J. Sch. Health 63(3): 133–135.Google Scholar
  40. Wold, B., Aarø, L. E., and Smith, C. (1994). Health Behavior in School-Aged Children. A WHO Cross-National Survey. (HBSC): Research protocol for the 1993—94 study. HEMIL-Report No. 4., University of Bergen, Research Centre for Health Promotion, Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
  41. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., and Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am. Educ. Res. J. 29(3): 663–676.Google Scholar
  42. Zimmerman, B. J., and Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J. Educ. Psychol. 82(1): 51–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerd Karin Natvig
    • 1
  • Grethe Albrektsen
    • 2
  • Ulla Qvarnstrøm
    • 3
  1. 1.Section of Nursing Science, Department of Public Health and Primary Health CareUniversity of BergenNorway
  2. 2.Section for Medical Statistics, Department of Public Health and Primary Health CareUniversity of BergenNorway
  3. 3.Department of Public Health and Primary Health CareUniversity of BergenNorway

Personalised recommendations