Advertisement

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 906–926 | Cite as

Hypergeometric Solutions of Soliton Equations

  • A. Yu. Orlov
  • D. M. Scherbin
Article

Abstract

We consider multivariable hypergeometric functions related to Schur functions and show that these hypergeometric functions are tau functions of the KP hierarchy and are simultaneously the ratios of Toda lattice tau functions evaluated at certain values of higher Toda lattice times. The variables of the hypergeometric functions are related to the higher times of those hierarchies via a Miwa change of variables. The discrete Toda lattice variable shifts the parameters of the hypergeometric functions. We construct the determinant representation and the integral representation of a special type for the KP tau functions. We write a system of linear differential and difference equations on these tau functions, which play the role of string equations.

Keywords

Soliton Lattice Variable Difference Equation Integral Representation Lattice Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    V. Dryuma, JETP Letters, 19, 387–388 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Funct. Anal. Appl., 8, 226–235 (1974); 13, 166–174 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Mikhailov, JETP Letters, 30, 414–418 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Date, M. Kashiwara, M. Jimbo, and T. Miwa, “Transformation groups for soliton equations,” in: Non-linear Integrable Systems: Classical Theory and Quantum Theory (Proc. RIMS Symp., Kyoto, Japan, 13–16 May 1981, M. Jimbo and T. Miwa, eds.), World Scientific, Singarope (1983), pp. 39–120.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. A. Dickey, Soliton Equations and Hamiltonian System, World Scientific, Singapore (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Ya. Vilenkin and A. U. Klimyk, Representation of Lie Groups and Special Functions, Vol. 3, Classical and Quantum Groups and Special Functions, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1992).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Ya. Vilenkin and A. U. Klimyk, Representation of Lie Groups and Special Functions: Recent Advances, Kluwer, Dordrecht (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. G. Macdonald, Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1995).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. C. Milne, “Summation theorems for basic hypergeometric series of Schur function argument,” in: Progress in Approximation Theory (A. A. Gonchar and E. B. Saff, eds.), Springer, New York (1992), pp. 51–77.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. I. Gross and D. S. Richards, Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 301, 781–811 (1987).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. Ueno and K. Takasaki, Adv. Stud. Pure Math., 4, 1–95 (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Yu. Orlov and P. Winternitz, Theor. Math. Phys., 113, 1393–1417 (1997).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. A. Dickey, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 8, 1357–1377 (1993).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Adler, T. Shiota, and P. van Moerbeke, Phys. Lett. A, 194, 33–34 (1994).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Yu Orlov, “Vertex operators, bar problem, symmetries, Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalism of (2+1) dimensional integrable systems,” in: Plasma Theory and Nonlinear and Turbulent Processes in Physics (Proc. 3rd Kiev Intl. Workshop, 1987, Vol. 1, V. G. Bar'yakhtar et al., eds.), World Scientific, Singapore (1988), pp. 116–134.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Takasaki, Comm. Math. Phys., 181, 131–156 (1996); T. Nakatsu, K. Takasaki, and S. Tsujimaru, Nucl. Phys. B, 443, 155–197 (1995).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    G. E. Andrews and E. Onofri, “Lattice gauge theory, orthogonal polynomials, and q-hypergeometric functions,” in: Special Functions: Group Theoretical Aspects and Applications (R. A. Askey, T. H. Koornwinder, and W. Schempp, eds.), Reidel, Dordrecht (1984), pp. 163–188.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Odzijevicz, Commun. Math. Phys., 192, 183–215 (1998).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    A. Yu. Morozov and L. Vinet, Phys. Lett. A, 8, 2891–2902 (1993).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Loutsenko and V. Spiridonov, Nucl. Phys. B, 538, 731–758 (1999).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Zabrodin, “Commuting difference operators with elliptic coefficients from Baxter's vacuum vectors,” QA/ 9912218 (1999); I. Frenkel and V. Turaev, “Elliptic solutions of the Yang—Baxter equations and modular hypergeometric functions,” in: The Arnold—Gelfand Mathematical Seminars (V. I. Arnold, I. M. Gelfand, V. S. Retakh, and M. Smirnov, eds.), Birkhauser, Boston (1997), pp. 171—204; A. Zhedanov and V. Spiridonov, Commun. Math. Phys., 210, 49–83 (2000).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Takebe and K. Takasaki, Rev. Math. Phys., 7, 743–808 (1995); hep-th/94050096 (1994).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Mineev-Weinstein, P. Wiegmann, and A. Zabrodin, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5106–5109 (2000).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. Segal and G. Wilson, Publ. Math. IHES, 61, 5–65 (1985).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Yu. Orlov, “Volterra operator algebra for zero-curvature representation: Universality of KP,” in: Nonlinear and Turbulent Processes in Physics (Series in Nonlinear Phys., Vol. 126, Potsdam-Kiev, 1991, A. Fokas, D. Kaup, and V. E. Zakharov, eds.), Springer, Berlin (1993), pp. 126–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Yu. Orlov
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. M. Scherbin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Faculty of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Nonlinear Wave Processes LaboratoryOceanology InstituteMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Centre de recherches mathématiquesUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations