Theory and Decision

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 213–238

Constraints and the Measurement of Freedom of Choice

Article

Abstract

This paper introduces considerations about constraints in the construction of measures of an agent's freedom. It starts with motivating the exercise from both the philosophical and the informational point of view. Then it presents two rankings of opportunity sets based on information about the extent of options and the constraints that a decision maker faces. The first ranking measures freedom as variety of choice; the second as non-restrictedness in choice.

Measures of liberty Freedom of choice Constraints Non-welfaristic foundations of normative economics Social choice theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Baigent, N. and Gaertner, W. (1996), Never Choose the Uniquely Largest: A Characterization, Economic Theory 8(2): 239-249.Google Scholar
  2. Berlin, I. (1969), Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cattaneo, G. (1997), Generalised Rough Sets (Preclusivity Fuzzy-Intuitionistic (BZ) Lattices), Studia Logica 58: 47-77Google Scholar
  4. Gaertner, W. and Xu, Y. (1999a), On rationalizability of choice functions: A characterization of the median, Social Choice and Welfare 16: 629-638.Google Scholar
  5. Gaertner, W. and Xu, Y. (1999b), Rationality and External Reference, Rationality and Society 11: 169-185.Google Scholar
  6. Gaertner, W., Pattanaik, P. K. and Suzumura, K. (1992), Individual Rights Revisited, Economica 59: 161-177.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, P. and Sugden, R. (1982), Evaluating Choice, International Review of Law and Economics 2: 47-65.Google Scholar
  8. Klemisch-Alhert, M. (1993), Freedom of Choice. A Comparison of Different Rankings of Opportunity Sets, Social Choice and Welfare 10: 189-207.Google Scholar
  9. Kristjánsson, K. (1996), Social Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. MacCallum, G. C. (1967), Negative and Positive Freedom, The Philosophical Review 76: 312-324.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, D., ed. (1991), Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Pattanaik, P.K. and K. Suzumura, (1996), IndividualRights and Social Evaluation: A Conceptual Framework, Oxford Economic Papers 48: 194-212.Google Scholar
  13. Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. (1990), On Ranking Opportunity Sets in Terms of Freedom of Choice, Recherches Économiques de Louvain 56: 383-390.Google Scholar
  14. Pattanaik, P.K. and Xu, Y. (1998), On Preferences and Freedom, Theory and Decision 44: 173-198.Google Scholar
  15. Pawlak, Z. (1982), Rough Sets, International Journal of Information and Computer Sciences 11: 341-356.Google Scholar
  16. Puppe, C. (1996), An Axiomatic Approach to 'Preference for Freedom of Choice', Journal of Economic Theory 68: 174-199.Google Scholar
  17. Sen, A.K. (1988), Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content, European Economic Review 32: 269-294.Google Scholar
  18. Sen, A.K. (1991), Welfare, Preference and Freedom, Journal of Econometrics 50: 15-29.Google Scholar
  19. Sen, A.K. (1993a), Internal Consistency of Choice, Econometrica 61: 495-521.Google Scholar
  20. Sen, A.K. (1993b), Markets and Freedoms: Achievements and Limitations of the Market Mechanism in Promoting Individual Freedoms, Oxford Economic Papers 45: 519-541.Google Scholar
  21. Suppes, P. (1987), Maximizing Freedom of Decision: An Axiomatic Analysis, In: Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. London: MacMillan, pp. 243-254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto di Scienze FinanziarieUniversità di Palermo and CPNSS, London School of EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations