, Volume 128, Issue 1–2, pp 75–91 | Cite as

What Is Said

  • François Recanati


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, J.: 1975, How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, K.: 1994a, ‘Semantic Slack: What is Said and More’ in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 267-291.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, K.: 1994b, ‘Conversational Impliciture’ Mind and Language 9, 124-162.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, K.: 1997, ‘The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters’ Linguistiche Berichte 8, 33-50.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, J.: 1998, ‘In Defense of Direct Belief: Substitutivity, Availability and Iterability’ Lingua e Stile 33, 461-470.Google Scholar
  6. Grice, P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’ Philosophical Review 66, 377-388.Google Scholar
  7. Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives’ in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 481-563.Google Scholar
  9. Recanati, F.: 1988, Meaning and Force, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Recanati, F.: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Recanati, F.: 1995, ‘The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation’ Cognitive Science 19, 207-232.Google Scholar
  12. Salmon, N.: 1991, ‘The Pragmatic Fallacy’ Philosophical Studies 63, 83-97.Google Scholar
  13. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Waismann, F.: 1951, ‘Verifiability’ in A. Flew (ed.), Logic and Language, 1st series, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 17-44.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • François Recanati
    • 1
  1. 1.CREAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations