Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 305–310 | Cite as

The Effects of Forelimb Deafferentation on the Post-Natal Development of Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampus

  • I. E. Kudryashov
  • I. V. Kudryashova


The effects of partial deafferentation of the forelimb on the development of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus of rats aged 13–18 days were studied. Long-term potentiation in hippocampus field CA1 was of greater amplitude and duration in control rats at 16–18 days of post-natal ontogenesis than in adult animals. Partial deafferentation by section of the median nerve in the forelimb on the 13th day of life led to the disappearance of this excess at 16–18 days. The peak in synaptic plasticity occurred later in operated animals – on day 17 – and was much less marked than in controls. The decreases in the amplitude and duration of long-term potentiation in hippocampal field CA1 in operated animals provides evidence for a decrease in the sensitivity and/or number of NMDA receptors. This suggests that partial deafferentation of one limb may lead not to a decrease but to an increase in spike and synaptic activity in the hippocampus, which in normal conditions may affect the maturation of the plastic properties of synaptic transmission associated with the expression and positions of NMDA receptors. The level of long-term potentiation in sham-operated rats was significantly greater than in controls of the same age. This significant increase in NMDA-dependent long-term potentiation may be explained by a decrease in the level of activation due to anesthesia. It is suggested that the decrease in the spike activity of cells receiving signals from the median nerve may be compensated for by activation of other specific and non-specific inputs.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    O. N. Barsova and N. L. Pisareva, "Neurophysiological and behavioral aspects of the development of the nervous system in animals in conditions of sensory deprivation," in: The Developing Brain and the Environment [in Russian], É. A. Asratyan (ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1980), p. 79.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. G. Gladkovich, A. D. Vorob'ev, V. S. Lushchekin, and K. V. Shuleikina, "The effects of section of the lingual nerve on the morphometric characteristics of neurons in the reticular nuclei of the brainstem in kittens," Neirofiziologiya, 24, No. 4, 409 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. I. Nezlina and A. D. Vorob'eva, "Restoration of functions after partial section of columns of the spinal cord in cats," in: Proceedings of the Scientific Conference of Physiologists, Biochemists, and Pathophysiologists [in Russian], Makhachkala (1970), Issue 1, p. 48.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. L. Pigareva and A. D. Vorob'eva, "The advanced appearance of behavioral responses in sensory deprived baby rats," Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 44, No. 6, 985 (1994).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    E. Yu. Sitnikova, "Partial deafferentation of the forelimbs in rats during early ontogenesis increases the reactivity of neurons in the sensorimotor cortex," Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 47, No. 6, 1051 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Audinat, B. Lambollez, J. Rossier, and F. Crepel, "Activity-dependent regulation of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit expression in rat cerebellar granule cells," Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, 1792 (1994).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Baude, Z. Nusser, E. Molnar, et al., "High-resolution immunogold localization of AMPA type glutamate receptor subunits at synaptic and non-synaptic sites in rat hippocampus," Neuroscience, 69, 1031 (1995).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. F. Bear, A. Kleinschmidt, G. A. Gu, and W. Singer, "Disruption of experience-dependent synaptic modifications in striate cortex by infusion of an NMDA receptor antagonist," J. Neurosci., 10, 909 (1990).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. W. Bekenstein and E. W. Lothman, "An in vivo study of the ontogeny of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the CA1 region and in the dentate gyrus of the rat hippocampal formation," Dev. Brain Res., 63, 245 (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. V. P. Bliss and G. L. Collingridge, "A synaptic model of memory: long-term potentiation in the hippocampus," Nature, 361, 31 (1993).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. H. Brown, P. F. Chapman, E. W. Kairiss, and C. L. Keenan, "Long-term potentiation," Science, 242, 724 (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. L. Buller, H. C. Larson, B. E. Schneider, et al., "The molecular basis of NMDA receptor subtypes: native receptor diversity is predicted by subunit composition," J. Neurosci., 14, No. 9, 5471 (1994).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Carmignoto and S. Vicini, "Activity-dependent decrease in NMDA-receptor responses during development of the visual cortex," Science, 258, 1007 (1992).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Constantine-Paton, H. T. Cline, and E. Debski, "Patterned activity, synaptic convergence, and the NMDA-receptor in developing visual pathways," Ann. Rev. Neurosci., 13, 1129 (1990).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. L. Collingridge, "The role of NMDA-receptors in learning and memory," Nature, 330, 604 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. L. Collingridge and W. Singer, "Excitatory amino acid receptors and synaptic plasticity," Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 11, 290 (1990).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. M. Craig, "Activity and synaptic receptor targeting: the long view," Neuron, 21, 459 (1998).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    G. M. Durand, Y. Kovalchuk, and A. Konnerth, "Long-term potentiation and functional synapse induction in developing hippocampus," Nature, 381, 71 (1996).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Ferrant, D. Feldmeyer, T. Takahashi, and S. G. Cull-Candy, "NMDA-receptor channel diversity in the developing cerebellum," Nature, 368, 335 (1994).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K. Fox, H. Sato, and N. Daw, "The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex," J. Neurosci., 9, 2443 (1989).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Fox, H. Sato, and D. Czepita, "Dark-rearing delays the loss of NMDA-receptor function in kitten visual cortex," Nature, 350, 342 (1991).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    G. Garthwaite, B. Yamini, Jr., and J. Garthwaite, "Selective loss of Purkinje and granule cell responsiveness to N-methyl-D-aspartate in rat cerebellum during development," Dev. Brain Res., 36, 288 (1987).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. G. G. Gu and A. B. MacDermott, "Activation of ATPP2X receptors elicits glutamate release from sensory neuron synapses," Nature, 389, 749 (1997).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    K. M. Harris and T. J. Teyler, "Developmental onset of long-term potentiation in area CA1 of the rat hippocampus," J. Physiol., 346, 27 (1984).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    K. Harsanyi and M. J. Friedlander, "Transient synaptic potentiation in the visual cortex. I. Cellular mechanisms," J. Neurophysiol., 77, 1269 (1997).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Hockfield and R. Kalb, "Activity-dependent structural changes during neuronal development," Curr. Opinion Neurobiol., 3, 87 (1993).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. A. Jones and R. W. Baughman, "NMDA-and non-NMDA-receptor components of excitatory synaptic potentials recorded from cells in layer V of rat visual cortex," J. Neurosci., 8, No. 9, 3522 (1988).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. G. Kalb, "Regulation of motor neuron dendrite growth by NMDA-receptor activation," Development, 120, 3063 (1994).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. G. Kalb and S. Hockfield, "Electrical activity in the neuromuscular unit can influence the molecular development of motor neurons," Dev. Biol., 162, 539 (1994).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Mooney, D. V. Madison, and C. J. Shatz, "Enhancement of transmission at the developing retinogeniculate synapse," Neuron, 10, 815 (1993).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. Moran and A. J. Patel, "Stimulation of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor promotes the biochemical differentiation of cerebellar granule neurons and not astrocytes," Brain Res., 486, 15 (1989).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R. J. O'Brien, A. L. Mammen, S. Blackshaw, et al., "The development of excitatory synapses in cultured spinal neurons," J. Neurosci., 17, 7339 (1997).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Rao and A. M. Craig, "Activity regulates the synaptic localization of the NMDA-receptors in hippocampal neurons," Neuron, 19, No. 4, 801 (1997).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    A. Robert, J. A. Black, and S. G. Waxman, "Endogenous NMDA-receptor activation regulates glutamate release in cultured spinal neurons," J. Neurophysiol., 80, 196 (1998).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    B. Sutor and J. J. Hablitz, "EPSPs in rat neocortical neurons in vitro. II. Involvement of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in the generation of EPSPs," J. Neurophysiol., 61, No. 3, 621 (1989).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    T. J. Teyler, "Comparative aspects of hippocampal and neocortical long-term potentiation," J. Neurosci. Meth., 28, No. 1<2, 101 (1989).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    T. J. Teyler, A. T. Perkins, and K. M. Harris, "The development of long-term potentiation in hippocampus and neocortex," Neuropsychologia, 27, No. 1, 31 (1989).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. Tremblay, M. P. Rosin, A. Represa, et al., "Transient increased density of NMDA binding sites in the developing rat hippocampus," Brain Res., 461, 393 (1988).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    J. Z. Tsien, P. T. Huereta, and S. Tonegawa, "The essential role of hippocampal CA1 NMDA-receptor-dependent synaptic plasticity in spatial memory," Cell, 87, 1317 (1996).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    T. Tsumoto, K. Hagivara, H. Sato, and Y. Hata, "NMDA-receptors in visual cortex of young kittens are more effective than those of adult cats," Nature, 327, 513 (1987).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    X.-M. Yu and M. W. Salter, "Gain control of NMDA-receptor currents by intracellular sodium," Nature, 396, 469 (1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. E. Kudryashov
    • 1
  • I. V. Kudryashova
    • 1
  1. 1.Russian Academy of SciencesInstitute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyMoscow

Personalised recommendations