Public Choice

, Volume 107, Issue 3–4, pp 311–331 | Cite as

Rational Irrationality and the Microfoundations of Political Failure

  • Bryan Caplan

Abstract

Models of inefficient political failure have been criticized forimplicitly assuming the irrationality of voters (Wittman, 1989,1995, 1999; Coate and Morris, 1995). Building on Caplan's (1999a,1999b) model of ``rational irrationality'', the current papermaintains that the assumption of voter irrationality is boththeoretically and empirically plausible. It then examinesmicrofoundational criticisms of four classes of political failuremodels: rent-seeking, pork-barrel politics, bureaucracy, andeconomic reform. In each of the four cases, incorporating simpleforms of privately costless irrationality makes it possibleto clearly derive the models' standard conclusions. Moreover, itfollows that efforts to mitigate political failures will besocially suboptimal, as most of the literature implicitlyassumes. It is a mistake to discount the empirical evidence forthese models on theoretical grounds.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. (1989). The economics of illusion. Economics and Politics 1: 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. and Dickens, W. (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review 72: 307–319.Google Scholar
  3. Alesina, A. and Summers, L. (1993). Central bank independence and macroeconomic performance: Some comparative evidence. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 23: 151–162.Google Scholar
  4. Alesina, A. and Drazen, A. (1991). Why are stabilizations delayed? American Economic Review 81: 1170–1188.Google Scholar
  5. Austen-Smith, D. (1991). Rational consumers and irrational voters: A review essay on black hole tariffs and endogenous policy theory. Economics and Politics 3: 73–92.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.Google Scholar
  7. Bender, B. and Lott, J. (1996). Legislator voting and shirking: A critical review of the literature. Public Choice 87: 67–100.Google Scholar
  8. Benson, B., Greenhut, M.L. and Holcombe, R. (1987). Interest groups and the antitrust paradox. Cato Journal 6: 801–817.Google Scholar
  9. Borcherding, T., Pommerehne, W.W., and Schneider, F. (1982). Comparing the efficiency of public production: The evidence from five countries. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 2: 127–156.Google Scholar
  10. Boudreaux, D. (1996). Was your high school civics teacher right after all?: Donald Wittman's The myth of democratic failure. Independent Review 1: 111–128.Google Scholar
  11. Bradbury, J.C. and Crain, W.M. (1999). Legislative organization and government spending: Cross-country evidence. Unpublished manuscript. George Mason University.Google Scholar
  12. Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral preference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Breton, A. and Wintrobe, R. (1982). The logic of bureaucratic conduct: An economic analysis of competition, exchange, and efficiency in private and public organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bruce, N. and Waldman, M. (1991). Transfers in kind: Why they can be efficient and nonpaternalistic. American Economic Review 81: 1345–1351.Google Scholar
  15. Brussell, E. (Ed.) (1988). Webster's new world dictionary of quotable definitions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Buchanan, J. (1984). Politics without romance: A sketch of positive public choice theory and its normative implications. In J. Buchanan and R. Tollison (Eds.), The theory of public choice II, 11–22. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Buchanan, J. (1980). Reform in the rent-seeking society. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), Towards a theory of the rent-seeking society, 359–367. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Caplan, B. (1999a). Rational ignorance vs. rational irrationality. Submitted to Economics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  19. Caplan, B. (1999b). The logic of collective belief. Submitted to Economic Inquiry.Google Scholar
  20. Caplan, B. (1999c). Systematically biased beliefs about economics: Robust evidence of judgmental anomalies from the survey of Americans and economists on the economy. Submitted to Journal of Political Economy.Google Scholar
  21. Coate, S. and Morris, S. (1995). On the form of transfers to special interests. Journal of Political Economy 103: 1210–1235.Google Scholar
  22. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, R. (1985). Takings: Private property and the power of eminent domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fernandez, R. and Rodrik, D. (1991). Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty. American Economic Review 81: 1146–1155.Google Scholar
  25. Fiorina, M. (1983). Flagellating the federal bureaucracy. Society 20: 66–73.Google Scholar
  26. Fremling, G. and Lott, J. (1996). The bias towards zero in aggregate perceptions: An explanation based on rationally calculating individuals. Economic Inquiry 34: 276–295.Google Scholar
  27. Gilligan, T. and Matsusaka, J. (1995). Deviations from constituent interests: The role of legislative structure and political parties in the States. Economic Inquiry 33: 383–401.Google Scholar
  28. Green, D. and Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Holcombe, R. (1985). An economic analysis of democracy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kelman, M. (1988). On democracy-bashing: A skeptical look at the theoretical and “empirical” practice of the Public Choice Movement. Virginia Law Review 74: 199–273.Google Scholar
  31. Klein, D. (1994). If government is so villainous: How come government officials don't seem like villains? Economics and Philosophy 10: 91–106.Google Scholar
  32. Krueger, A. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review 61: 291–303.Google Scholar
  33. Kuran, T. and Sunstein, C. (1999). Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Review 51: 683–768.Google Scholar
  34. Labán, R. and Sturzenegger, F. (1994). Distributional conflict, financial adaptation, and delayed stabilization. Economics and Politics 6: 257–276.Google Scholar
  35. Lott, J. (1997a). Does political reform increase wealth?: Or, why the difference between the Chicago and Virginia Schools is really an elasticity question. Public Choice 91: 219–227.Google Scholar
  36. Lott, J. (1997b). Donald Wittman's The myth of democratic failure. Public Choice 92: 1–13.Google Scholar
  37. Magee, S., Brock, W. and Young, L. (1989). Black hole tariffs and endogenous policy theory: Political economy in general equilibrium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations: Economic growth, stagflation and social rigidities. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Olson, M. (1996). Big bills left on the sidewalk: Why some nations are rich and others are poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 3–24.Google Scholar
  41. Page, B. (1996). Who deliberates?: Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Page, B. and Shapiro, R. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Ranis, G. and Mahmood, S. (1992). The political economy of development policy change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Rodrik, D. (1996). Understanding economic policy reform. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 9–41.Google Scholar
  45. Rogoff, K. (1985). The optimal degree of commitment to an intermediate monetary target. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100: 1169–1190.Google Scholar
  46. Rowley, C. (1988). Rent-seeking in constitutional perspective. In C. Rowley, R. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), The political economy of rent-seeking, 447–464. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Rowley, C. (1997). Donald Wittman's The myth of democratic failure. Public Choice 92: 15–26.Google Scholar
  48. Rowley, C. and Tullock, G. (1988). Introduction. In C. Rowley, R. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), The political economy of rent-seeking, 3–13. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Sachs, J. (1994). Life in the economic emergency room. In J. Williamson (Ed.), The political economy of policy reform, 503–523. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  50. Shiller, R., Boycko, M. and Korobov, V. (1991). Popular attitudes toward free markets: The Soviet Union and the United States compared. American Economic Review 81: 385–400.Google Scholar
  51. Tollison, R. (1982). Rent seeking: A survey. Kyklos 35: 575–602.Google Scholar
  52. Tollison, R. and Wagner, R. (1991). Romance, realism, and economic reform. Kyklos 44: 57–70.Google Scholar
  53. Tullock, G. (1988). Further directions for rent-seeking research. In C. Rowley, R. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), The political economy of rent-seeking, 465–480. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Tullock, G. (1980). The transitional gains trap. In J. Buchanan, R. Tollison and G. Tullock (Eds.), Towards a theory of the rent-seeking society, 211–221. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal 5: 224–232.Google Scholar
  56. Washington Post (1999). Washingtonpost.com: Congressional pay special report, at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/pay/pay.htm.Google Scholar
  57. Weingast, B., Shepsle, K. and Johnsen, C. (1981). The political economy of benefits and costs: A neoclassical approach to distributive politics. Journal of Political Economy 89: 642–664.Google Scholar
  58. Wintrobe, R. (1987). The market for corporate control and the market for political conduct. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3: 435–448.Google Scholar
  59. Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Wittman, D. (1989). Why democracies produce efficient results. Journal of Political Economy 97: 1395–1424.Google Scholar
  61. Wittman, D. (1995). The myth of democratic failure: Why political institutions are efficient. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wittman, D. (1999). Rational expectations and democratic politics. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bryan Caplan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics and Center for the Study of Public ChoiceGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations