Philosophical Studies

, Volume 104, Issue 3, pp 269–290 | Cite as

Tropes and Ordinary Physical Objects

  • Kris McDaniel
Article

Abstract

I argue that a solution to puzzles concerning the relationship ofobjects and their properties – a version of the `bundle' theory ofparticulars according to which ordinary objects are mereologicalfusions of monadic and relational tropes – is also a solution topuzzles of material constitution involving the allegedco-location of material objects. Additionally, two argumentsthat have played a prominent role in shaping the current debate,Mark Heller's argument for Four Dimensionalism and Peter vanInwagen's argument against Mereological Universalism, are shownto be unsound given this version of the bundle theory.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Armstrong, D.M. (1997): A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D.M. (1989): Universals: An Opinionated Introduction, Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bacon, J. (1995): Universals and Property Instances: The Alphabet of Being Aristotelian Society Monograph, Vol. 15, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, L.R. (2000): Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, M. (1994): ‘Preserving the Principle of One Object to a Place: A Novel Account of the Relations Among Sorts, Sortals, and Persistence Conditions’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, 591–624.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, K. (1991): Abstract Particulars Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Chisholm, R. (1976): Person and Object: A Metaphysical Study, Open Court.Google Scholar
  8. Geach, P.T. (1967): ‘Selections from “Reference and Generality”’, in Rea (1997) ‘Identity’, Review of Metaphysics 21, 3–12.Google Scholar
  9. Gibbard, A. (1975): ‘Contingent Identity’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 187–221.Google Scholar
  10. Heller, M. (1992): The Ontology of Physical Objects: Four Dimensional Hunks of Matter, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hudson, H.: Human Persons (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  12. Kripke, S. (1972): Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Leonard, H. and Goodman, N. (1940): ‘The Calculus of Individuals and Its Uses’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 5, 45–55.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, D. (1991): Parts of Classes, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, D. (1986a): On the Plurality of Worlds, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, D. (1986b): Philosophical Papers Vol. II, Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lewis, D. (1983a): ‘Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal Logic’, in Lewis (1986b).Google Scholar
  18. Lewis, D. (1983a): ‘Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies’, in Lewis (1986b).Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, D. (1983a): Philosophical Papers Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis, D. (1983b): ‘NewWork for a Theory of Universals’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy (December) 61 (4), 343–377.Google Scholar
  21. Loux, M.J. (1998): Metaphysics, Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Markosian, N.: ‘Brutal Composition’, Philosophical Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  23. Myro, G. (1997): 'Identity and Time’, in Rea (ed.).Google Scholar
  24. Noonan, H. (1993): 'Constitution is Identity’, Mind 102, 133–146.Google Scholar
  25. Parsons, T. (1997): ‘Entities Without Identity’, in Rea (ed.).Google Scholar
  26. Quine, W.V.O. (1996): ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’, in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, Cambridge,MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rea, M.: ‘Constitution and Kind-Membership’, Philosophical Studies (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Rea, M. (1997): Material Constitution: a Reader (ed.), Rowman & Littlefield Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rea, M. (1995): ‘The Problem of Material Constitution’, The Philosophical Review (October) 104(4), 525–552.Google Scholar
  30. Simons, P. (1987): Parts: A Study in Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sider, T. (1997): ‘Four Dimensionalism’, The Philosophical Review 106, 197–231.Google Scholar
  32. Thomson, J.J. (1983): ‘Parthood and Identity Across Time’, The Journal of Philosophy 80, 201–220.Google Scholar
  33. Unger, P. (1979): ‘There Are No Ordinary Things’, Synthese 41(2).Google Scholar
  34. Van Cleeve, J. (1986): ‘Mereological Essentialism, Mereological Conjunctivism, and Identity Across Time’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11, 141–156.Google Scholar
  35. Van Inwagen, P. (1990a): Material Beings, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Van Inwagen, P. (1990b): ‘Four-Dimensional Objects’, Nous 24, 245–255.Google Scholar
  37. Van Inwagen, P. (1981): ‘The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62, 123–137.Google Scholar
  38. Wiggins, D. (1997): ‘On Being in the Same Place at the Same Time’, in Rea (ed.).Google Scholar
  39. Williams, D.C.: ‘The Elements of Being’, Review of Metaphysics 7, 3-18 and 171–192.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kris McDaniel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MassachusettsAmherst

Personalised recommendations