Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 87–103 | Cite as

Liability for Autonomous Agent Design

  • Carey Heckman
  • Jacob O. Wobbrock


Though exciting scientifically, autonomous agent design can result in legal liability. This paper surveys those legal concerns, focusing on issues arising from the unique qualities of agents not found in conventional software. Informed designers can more effectively reduce their liability exposure and influence emerging agent liability law and policies.

legal liability design adaptivity anthropomorphism autonomy adaptivity strict liability negligence misrepresentation 


  1. 1.
    L. Burgunder, Legal Aspects of Managing Technology. South-Western Publishing: Cincinnati, Ohio, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Caglayan, and C. Harrison, Agent Sourcebook. John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Ditlea, “Silent Partners.” PC Computing, pp. 160-171, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Johnson, Computer Ethics, 2ed. Prentice Hall: New Jersey, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Laurel, Interface Agents: Metaphors with Character. In B. Laurel, ed., The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1990.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Lieberman, Letizia: An Agent that Assists Web Browsing. Proc.IJCAI 95, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Maes, Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM 37,7 (July 1994), 31-40, 146.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Maes, Artificial Life Meets Entertainment: Lifelike Autonomous Agents. Communications of the ACM 38,11 (November 1995), 108-114.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. Maes, Intelligent Software. Scientific American, September 1995, 84-86.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. E. Miller, Civilizing Cyberspace. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. H. Moor, Are There Decisions Computers Should Never Make? Nature and Systems 1 (1979), 217-229.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Neumann, Computer-Related Risks. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Reeves, and C. Nass, The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Shneiderman, Beyond Intelligent Machines: Just Do It! IEEE Software 10,1 (January 1993), 100-103.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Selker, COACH: A Teaching Agent that Learns. Communications of the ACM 37,7 (July 1994), 92-99.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Selker, ed. New Paradigms for Using Computers. Communications of the ACM 39,8 (August 1996), 60-69.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Vergari, and V. Shue, Fundamentals of Computer-High Technology Law. American Law Institute-American Bar Association, Philadelphia, PA, 1991.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carey Heckman
    • 1
  • Jacob O. Wobbrock
    • 2
  1. 1.Stanford Law School, Crown QuadrangleStanford
  2. 2.Stanford Symbolic Systems ProgramStanford

Personalised recommendations