Advertisement

Resource-Oriented Multicommodity Market Algorithms

  • Fredrik Ygge
  • Hans Akkermans
Article

Abstract

In search for market equilibrium in multicommodity markets, price-oriented schemes are normally used. That is, a set of prices (one price for each commodity) is updated until supply meets demand for each commodity. In some cases such an approach is rather inefficient, and a resource-oriented scheme can be highly competitive. In a resource-oriented scheme the allocations are updated until the market equilibrium is found. It is well known that in a two-commodity market resource-oriented schemes are possible. In this article we show that resource-oriented algorithms can be used for the general multicommodity case as well, and present and analyze an algorithm. The algorithm has been implemented and some performance properties, for a specific example, are presented.

market-oriented programming and distributed resource allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. M. Akkermans, F. Ygge, and A. Andersson, ''Smart solutions: Energy management through electronic markets,'' The ISES Project Book, EnerSearch AB: Malmo, 1998, chap. 5, pp. 81–106. (Available from http://www.ene/search.se.)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Andersson and F. Ygge, ''Managing large scale computational markets,'' in Proceedings of the Software Technology Track of the 31th Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS31), H. El-Rewini (Ed.), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamos, January 1998, vol. VII,pp. 4–14. ISBN 0–8186–8251–5, ISSN 1060–3425, IEEE Catalalog Number 98TB100216. (Available from. http://www.enersearch.se/ygge.)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Cheng and M. P. Wellman, ''The WALRAS algorithm—a convergent distributed implementation of general equilibrium outcomes,'' Computational Economics, vol. 12, pp. 1–24, 1998. (Available from http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/wellman.)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Fletcher, Practical Methods of Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, 1987, second edition.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computation, John Hopkins University Press, 1991, second edition.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Hu and M. P. Wellman, ''Self-fulfilling bias in multiagent learning,'' in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS'96, M. Tokoro (Ed.), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, December 9–14, 1996, pp. 118–125.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. A. Huberman and S. Clearwater, ''A multi-agent system for controlling building environments,'' in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS'95, AAAI Press/The MIT Press, Menlo Park, CA, June 12–14, 1995, pp. 171–176.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Hurwicz, ''On informationally decentralized systems,'' in Decision and Organization, C. B. McGuire and R. Radner (Eds.), University of Minnesota Press, 1986, chap. 14, pp. 297–336, second edition.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Ibaraki and N. Katoh, Resource Allocation ProblemAlgorithmic Approaches, The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. F. Kurose and R. Simha, ''A microeconomic approach to optimal resource allocation in distributed computer systems,'' IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 38(5), pp. 705–717, 1989.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Lenting and P. Braspenning, ''An all-pay auction approach to resource allocation,'' in Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI'94, A. Cohn (Ed.), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Mas-Colell, M. Whinston, and J. R. Green, Microeconomic Theory, Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. S. Miller and K. E. Drexler, ''Markets and computation: Agoric open system,'' available at: http://www.agorics.com/agorics/agoricsPapers/aos/AOS0.html, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Nicholson, Microeconomic TheoryBasic Principles and Extensions, The Dryden Press: Orlando, 1995, sixth edition.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Pan, ''How can we speed up matrix multiplication?'' SIAM Review, vol. 26, pp. 393–416, 1984.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Press, S. Teukolsky, W. Vetterling, and B. Flannery, Numerical Recipies in C, Cambridge University Press, 1994, second edition.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. W. Sandholm and F. Ygge, Constructing speculative demand functions in equilibrium markets, submitted.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. W. Sandholm and F. Ygge, ''On the gains and losses of speculation in equilibrium markets,'' in Proceeding of the Fifteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 97, August 23–29, 1997, pp. 632–638. (Available from http://www.enersearch.se/ygge.)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. B. Shoven and J. Whalley, Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press: New York, 1992.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Takayama, Mathematical Economics, Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. P. Wellman, ''A market-oriented programming environment and its application to distributed multicommodity flow problems,'' Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, (1), pp. 1–23, 1993. (Available from http://www.jai/. org/.)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. P. Wellman, ''A computational market for distributed configuration design,'' in Proceedings of AAAI'94, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA, 1994, pp. 401–407. (Available from http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/wellman/Publications.html.)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. P. Wellman, ''Market-oriented programming: Some early lessons,'' in Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation, S. Clearwater (Ed.), World Scientific, 1996, chap 4. (More info about the book at http://www.wspc.co.uk/wspc/Books/compai_hilites.htmlambc. The paper is available from http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/wellman/Publications.html.)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. E. White, ''Telescript technology: The foundations for the electronic market place,'' Technical report, General Magic Inc., 2465 Latham Street, Mountain View, CA 94040, USA, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    H. Yamaki, M. P. Wellman, and T. Ishida, ''A market-based approach to allocating QoS for multimedia applications,'' in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS'96, M. Tokora (Ed.), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, December 9–14, 1996, pp. 385–392. (Available from http://ai.eecs.umich.edu/people/wellman/Publications.html.)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. Ygge and J. M. Akkermans, ''Power load management as a computational market,'' in Proceed-ings of the Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems ICMAS'96, M. Tokoro (Ed.), AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, December 9–14, 1996, pp. 393–400. (Available from http:/www.enersearch.se/ygge.)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    F. Ygge and J. M. Akkermans, ''An analysis of centralized control orientations vs. decentralized markets,'' 1999, accepted for publication in Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, JAIR (http://www.jair.org.)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Ygge, J. M. Akkermans, A. Andersson, M. Krejic, and E. Boertjes, ''The HomeBots system and field tests: A multi-commodity market for predicitive load management,'' in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference and Exhibition on The Practical Application of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agents (PAAM99), April 19–21, 1999, pp. 363–382. (Available from http:// www.enersearch.se/ygge.)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. Ygge, ''Market-Oriented Programming and its Application to Power Load Management,'' Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Science, Lund University, 1998, ISBN 91–628–3055–4, CODEN LUNFD6/ NFCS-1012 /1–224/(1998). (Available from http://www.enersearch.se/ygge.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fredrik Ygge
    • 1
  • Hans Akkermans
    • 2
  1. 1.EnerSearch AB and Uppsala University, Chalmers Science ParkGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentAKMC Knowledge Management and Free University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations