Biological Invasions

, Volume 1, Issue 2–3, pp 301–311 | Cite as

Before, During and After: The Need for Long-term Monitoring in Invasive Plant Species Management

  • Bernd Blossey


The invasion of non-indigenous plants is considered one of the primary threats to rare and endangered species as well as to the integrity and function of North American ecosystems. However, many of the suspected negative ecosystem impacts are based on anecdotal evidence. For example, there is almost unanimous agreement among natural resource managers of the detrimental ecological impacts of species such as Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife), Phragmites australis (common reed) and Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) but convincing documentation is scarce. Experimental and theoretical ecology predicts large ecosystem impacts of the most widespread invasive species. However, it is difficult to prioritize control of species that occur at intermediate densities. Long-term monitoring before and during the invasion as well as before, during and after any control attempts can provide valuable ecological information. In particular, it is important to understand how changes in the abundance of species influence ecosystem properties and processes which, in turn, will help guide management decisions. Ideally, this monitoring has to go beyond 'simple’ impacts on plant communities, involve cross-disciplinary teams of scientists and should incorporate many different taxa and their interactions. Monitoring design and data collection should be sophisticated enough to allow statistically sound data analysis. The available information will be paramount in (1) developing new political and scientific guidelines in invasive species management, (2) helping resolve potential conflicts of interest and (3) helping change public attitudes regarding growth, sale, and control of non-indigenous species.

Alliaria petiolata biological control garlic mustard invasions Lythrum salicaria monitoring Phragmites australis purple loosestrife 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amrine JW and Stasny (1992) Biocontrol of multiflora rose. In: McKnight BN (ed) Biological Pollution, the Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic Species, pp 9–21. Indiana Academy of Sciences, Indianapolis, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MG (1995) Interaction between Lythrum salicaria and native organisms: a critical review. Environmental Management 19: 225–231Google Scholar
  3. Anttila CK, Daehler CC, Rank NE and Strong DR (1998) Greater male fitness of a rare invader (Spartina alterniflora, Poaceae) threatens a common native (Spartina foliosa) with hybridization. American Journal of Botany 85: 1597–1601Google Scholar
  4. Austin D (1978) Exotic plants and their effects in southeastern Florida. Environmental Conservation 5: 25–34Google Scholar
  5. Barlocher F and Biddiscombe NR (1996) Geratology and decomposition of Typha latifolia and Lythrum salicaria in a freshwater marsh. Archiv fuer Hydrobiologie 136: 309–325Google Scholar
  6. Benoit LK (1997) Impact of the spread of Phragmites on populations of tidal marsh birds in Connecticut. MA thesis. Connecticut College, New London, Connecticut, 56 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein NP and McLean EB (1980) Nesting of red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoenicus) in cattails and common reed grass in Mentor Marsh, Ohio, USA. Ohio Journal of Science 80: 14–19Google Scholar
  8. Berthold P, Kaiser A, Querner U and Schlenker R (1993) Analysis of trapping figures at Mettnau Station S. Germany with respect to the population development in small birds. A 20 years summary. 34th report of the MRI-program. Journal of Ornithology 134: 283–299Google Scholar
  9. Blossey B, Schroeder D, Hight SD and Malecki RA (1994) Host specificity and environmental impact of the weevil Hylobius transversovittatus, a biological control agent of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Weed Science 42: 128–133Google Scholar
  10. Brown BT and Trosset MW (1989) Nesting-habitat relationships of riparian birds along the Colorado River in Grand canyon, Arizona, USA. Southwestern Naturalist 34: 260–270Google Scholar
  11. Carroll S, Miller RL and Whitson PD (1984) Status of 4 orchid species at Silver Lake Fen, Iowa, USA, Complex. Proceedings of the Iowa Academie of Science 91: 132–139Google Scholar
  12. Cavers PB, Heagy MI and Kokron RF (1979) The biology of Canadian weeds. 35. Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara and Grande. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 59: 217–229Google Scholar
  13. Chew FS (1981) Coexistence and local extinction in two Pieris butterflies. American Naturalist 118: 655–672Google Scholar
  14. Clark WR (1994) Habitat selection by muskrats in experimental marshes undergoing succession. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72: 675–680Google Scholar
  15. Clarkson RW and Devos Jr JC (1986) The bullfrog Rana catesbeiana in the Lower Colorado River, Arizona-California, USA. Journal of Herpetology 20: 42–49Google Scholar
  16. Daehler CC and Strong DR (1996) Status, prediction and prevention of introduced cordgrass Spartina spp. invasions in Pacific estuaries, USA. Biological Conservation 78: 51–58Google Scholar
  17. DeLoach CJ (1990) Prospects for biological control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in riparian habitats of the southwestern United States. In: Defosse ES (ed) Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds, 6–11 March 1988, Rome, Italy, pp 307–314. Istituto Sperimentale per la Patologia Vegetale, Ministero dell'Agricoltura e delle Foreste, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  18. Dennill GB and Moran VC (1989) On insect-plant associations in agriculture and the selection of agents for weed biocontrol. Annals of Applied Biology 114: 157–166Google Scholar
  19. Di Tomaso JH (1998) Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technology 12: 326–336Google Scholar
  20. Diehl JK, Holliday NJ, Lindgren CJ and Roughley RE (1997) Insects associated with purple loosestrife, Lythrum salicaria L., in southern Manitoba. Canadian Entomologist 129: 937–948Google Scholar
  21. Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Gorves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (1989) Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunbabin JS and Bowmer KH (1992) Potential use of constructed wetlands for treatment of industrial wastewater containing metals. Science of the Total Environment 111: 151–168Google Scholar
  23. Dunnett NP, Willis AJ, Hunt R and Grime JP (1998) A 38-year study of relations between weather and vegetation dynamics in road verges near Bibury, Gloucestershire. Journal of Ecology 86: 610–623Google Scholar
  24. Ellis LM (1995) Bird use of saltcedar and cottonwood vegetation in the Middle Rio Grande Valley of New Mexico, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 30: 339–349Google Scholar
  25. Ellis LM, Crawford CS and Morales MC Jr (1997) Rodent communities in native and exotic riparian vegetation in the Middle Rio Grande Valley of central New Mexico. Southwestern Naturalist 42: 13–19Google Scholar
  26. Emery SL and Perry JA (1996) Decomposition rates and phosphorous concentrations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and cattail (Typha spp.) in fourteen Minnesota wetlands. Hydrobiologia 323: 129–138Google Scholar
  27. Ernst E, Rand JI, Barnes J and Stevinson C (1998) Adverse effects profile of the herbal antidepressant St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.). European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 54: 589–594Google Scholar
  28. Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Newstrom-Lloyd LE, Rizzardi MA, Barthell JF, Griswold TL, Kim JY and Kappagoda S (1998) Monitoring solitary bees in modified wildland habitats: implications for bee ecology and conservation. Environmental Entomology 27: 1137–1148Google Scholar
  29. Gilbert M, Leclair Jr R and Fortin R (1994) Reproduction of the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) in floodplain habitat in the Richelieu River, P. Quebec, Canada. Journal of Herpetology 28: 465–470Google Scholar
  30. Gochfeld M and Burger J (1997) Butterflies of New Jersey. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  31. Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. Journal of Ecology 86: 902–910Google Scholar
  32. Grout JA, Levins CD and Richardson JS (1997) Decomposition rates of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and Lyngbyei's sedge (Carex lyngbyei) in the Fraser River Estuary. Estuaries 20: 96–102Google Scholar
  33. Guil GJL and Torija IE (1997) Nutrient composition in wild edible plants (II). Alimentaria 35: 95–101Google Scholar
  34. Hager HA and McCoy KD (1998) The implications of accepting untested hypotheses: a review of the effects of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North America. Biodiversity and Conservation 7: 1069–1079Google Scholar
  35. Hickey JM (1997) Breeding biology and population dynamics of the black tern in Western New York. MS thesis, 160 pp. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Hiebert RD (1997) Prioritizing invasive plants and planning for management In: Luken JO and Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions, pp 195–212. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Hight SD (1990) Available feeding niches in populations of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in the Northeastern United States. In: Defosse ES (ed) Proceedings of the VII International Symposium on the Biological Control of Weeds, 6–11 March 1988, Rome, Italy, pp 269–278. Istituto Sperimentale per la Patologia Vegetale, Ministero dell'Agricoltura e delle Foreste, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  38. Hinz HL and Gerber E (1998) Investigations on potential biological control agents of garlic mustard, Alliaria petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara and Grande. Annual Report, 22 pp. CABI Bioscience Center, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaspersen SR, Theus L, Guirguis OM, Gossweiler B and Meier-Abt PJ (1996) Acute poisonings with toxic plants in Switzerland between 1966 and 1994. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift 126: 1085–1098Google Scholar
  40. Kiviat E (1996) American goldfinch nests in purple loosestrife. Wilson Bulletin 108: 182–186Google Scholar
  41. Knapp PA (1992) Secondary plant succession and vegetation recovery in two Western Great Basin desert ghost towns. Biological Conservation 60: 81–89Google Scholar
  42. Knutson L and Coulson JR (1997) Procedures and policies in the USA regarding precautions in the introduction of classical biological control agents. Bulletin OEPP 27: 133–142Google Scholar
  43. Kolesik P, Mills A and Sedgley M (1998) Anatomical characteristics affecting the musical performance of clarinet reeds made from Arundo donax L. (Gramineae). Annals of Botany 81: 151–155Google Scholar
  44. Lor SK (1999) Habitat use and population status of marsh birds in Western New York. MS thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 135 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Louda SM, Kendall D, Connor J and Simberloff D (1997) Ecological effects of an insect introduced for the biological control of weeds. Science 277: 1088–1090Google Scholar
  46. Lynd JQ and Ansman TR (1990) Exceptional forage regrowth nodulation and nitrogenase activity of kudzu, Pueria lobata Willd. Ohivi grown on eroded Dougherty loam subsoil. Journal of Plant Nutrition 13: 861–886Google Scholar
  47. Macdonald IAW, Graber DM, DeBenedetti S, Groves RH and Fuentes ER (1988) Introduced species in nature reserves in Mediterranean-type climatic regions of the world. Biological Conservation 44: 37–66Google Scholar
  48. Macdonald IAW, Loope LL, Usher MB and Hamann O (1989) Wildlife conservation and the invasion of nature reserves by introduced species: a global perspective. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (eds) Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, pp 215–255. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Mack RN (1996) Predicting the identity and fate of plant invaders: emergent and emerging approaches. Biological Conservation 78: 107–121Google Scholar
  50. Mal TK, Lovett-Doust J and Lovett-Doust L (1997) Time-dependent competitive displacement of Typha angustifolia by Lythrum salicaria. Oikos 79: 26–33Google Scholar
  51. Malecki RA, Blossey B, Hight SD, Schroeder D, Kok LT and Coulson JR (1993) Biological control of purple loosestrife. Bioscience 43: 680–686Google Scholar
  52. Marks M, Lapin B and Randall J (1994) Phragmites australis (P. communis): threats, management, and monitoring. Natural Areas Journal 14: 285–294Google Scholar
  53. McCarthy BC (1997) Response of a forest understory community to experimental removal of an invasive nonindigneous plant (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) In: Luken JO and Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions, pp 117–130. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. McEvoy PB (1996) Host specificity and biological pest control. Bioscience 46: 401–405Google Scholar
  55. McQueen DJ, Mills EL, Forney JL and Johannes MRS (1992) Trophic level relationships in pelagic food webs: comparisons derived from long-term data sets for Oneida Lake, New York (USA), and Lake St. George, Ontario (Canada). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49: 1588–1596Google Scholar
  56. Meyerson LA, Saltonstall K, Windham L, Kiviat E and Findlay S (1999) A comparison of Phragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America. Wetland Ecology and Management (submitted)Google Scholar
  57. Nuzzo VA (1991) Experimental control of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata [Bieb.] Cavara and Grande) in northern Illinois using fire, herbicide and pulling. Natural Areas Journal 11: 158–167Google Scholar
  58. Nuzzo V (1993) Distribution and spread of the invasive biennial Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard) in North America. In: McKnight BN (ed) Biological Pollution, the Control and Impact of Invasive Exotic Species, pp 137–145. Indiana Academy of Sciences, Indianapolis, IndianaGoogle Scholar
  59. Opler PA, Pavulaan H and Stanford RE (1995) Butterflies of North America. Http:// Scholar
  60. Ramakrishnan PS and Vitousek PM (1989) Ecosystem-level processes and the consequences of biological invasions. In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmánek M and Williamson M (eds) Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, pp 281–300. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Randall JM (1996) Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technology 10: 370–383Google Scholar
  62. Randall JM and Marinelli J (1996) Invasive Plants. Weeds of the Global Garden. Brooklyn Botanic Garden Handbook No. 149, Brooklyn, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  63. Rawinski TJ (1982) The ecology and management of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) in central New York. Masters thesis, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 88 ppGoogle Scholar
  64. Rawinski TJ and Malecki RA (1984) Ecological relationships among purple loosestrife, cattail and wildlife at the Montezuma National Wildlife Refuge. New York Fish and Game Journal 31: 81–87Google Scholar
  65. Reichard SE (1997) Prevention of invasive plant introductions on national and local levels. In: Luken JO and Thieret JW (eds) Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions, pp 215–227. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. Sala A, Smith SD and Devitt DA (1996) Water use by Tamarix ramosissima and associated phreatophytes in a Mojave Desert floodplain. Ecological Applications 6: 888–898Google Scholar
  67. Schwarzländer M and Häfliger P (1998) Evaluating the potential for biological control of Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin ex Steudel. Annual Report, 32 pp. CABI Bioscience Center, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  68. Schwendiman JL (1977) Coastal sand dune stabilization in the Pacific Northwest, USA. International Journal of Biometeorology 21: 281–289Google Scholar
  69. Segelquist CA and Rogers MJ (1975) Response of Japanese honeysuckle to fertilization. Journal of Wildlife Management 39: 769–775Google Scholar
  70. Skinner LC, Rendall WC and Fuge EL (1994) Minnesota's purple loosestrife program: history, findings and management recommendations. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Special Publication 145, St. Paul, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  71. Stafford SK and Dimmick RW (1979) Autumn and winter foods of ruffed grouse in the southern Appalachians. Journal of Wildlife Management 43: 121–127Google Scholar
  72. Stebbins RC (1985) A field guide to Western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  73. Templer P, Findlay S and Wigand C (1998) Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem. Wetlands 18: 70–78Google Scholar
  74. Tewksbury L, Casagrande R and Blossey B (1999) Potential for biological control of Phragmites australis (in North America) (in preparation)Google Scholar
  75. Thomas LK (1980) The impact of three exotic plant species on a Potomac Island. National Park Service Scientific Monograph Series 13: 1–179Google Scholar
  76. Thompson DQ (1991) History of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) biological control efforts. Natural Areas Journal 11: 148–150Google Scholar
  77. Thompson DQ, Stuckey RL and Thompson EB (1987) Spread, impact, and control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American Wetlands. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Research 2, Washington, DC, 55 ppGoogle Scholar
  78. Underwood AJ (1997) Environmental decision making and the precautionary principle: what does this principle mean in environmental sampling practice? Landscape and Urban Planning 37: 137–146Google Scholar
  79. US Congress Office of Technology Assessment (1993) Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. OTA-F-565, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  80. Usher MB (1988) Biological invasions of nature reserves: a search for generalizations. Biological Conservation 44: 119–135Google Scholar
  81. Vitousek P (1986) Biological invasions and ecosystem properties: can species make a difference? In: Mooney HA and Drake JA (eds) Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii, pp 163–176. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  82. Vitousek PM (1990) Biological invasions and ecosystem processes: towards an integration of population biology and ecosystem studies. Oikos 57: 7–13Google Scholar
  83. Vitousek PM and Walker LR (1989) Biological invasion by Myrica faya in Hawaii USA. Plant demography, nitrogen fixation, ecosystem effects. Ecological Monographs 59: 247–266Google Scholar
  84. Vitousek PM, D'Antonio C, Loope LL and Westbrooks R (1996) Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 468–478Google Scholar
  85. Vivrette NJ and Muller CH (1977) Mechanisms of invasion and dominance of coastal grassland by Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Ecological Monographs 47: 301–318Google Scholar
  86. Weihe PE and Neely RK (1997) The effects of shading on competition between purple loosestrife and broad-leaved cattail. Aquatic Botany 59: 127–138Google Scholar
  87. Weiher E, Wisheu IC, Keddy PA and Moore DRJ (1996) Establishment, persistence, and management implications of experimental wetland plant communities. Wetlands 16: 208–218Google Scholar
  88. Westbrooks R (1998) Invasive Plants, Changing the Landscape of America: Fact Book, Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds (FICMNEW), Washington, DC, 109 ppGoogle Scholar
  89. Whitt MB, Prince HH and Cox RR Jr (1999) Avian use of purple loosestrife dominated habitat relative to other vegetation types in a Lake Huron wetland complex. Wilson Bulletin 111: 105–114Google Scholar
  90. Yensen E, Quinney DL, Johnson K, Timmerman K and Steenhof K (1992) Fire, vegetation changes, and population fluctuations of Townsend's ground squirrels. American Midlands Naturalist 128: 299–312Google Scholar
  91. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Blossey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Natural ResourcesCornell University IthacaUSA (e-mail

Personalised recommendations