Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 91–125 | Cite as

Well-Being in the Welfare State: Level Not Higher, Distribution Not More Equitable

  • Ruut Veenhoven
Article

Abstract

The terms well-being and welfare are Often bracketed together, especially well-being and state welfare. The level of well-being is believed to be higher in welfare states, and its distribution more equitable. This theory is tested here in a comparative study of 41 nations from 1980 to 1990. The size of state welfare is measured by social security expenditures. The well-being of citizens is measured in terms of the degree to which they lead healthy and happy lives.

Contrary to expectation, there appears to be no link between the size of the welfare state and the level of well-being within it. In countries with generous social security schemes, people are not healthier or happier than in equally affluent countries where the state is less open-handed. Increases or reductions in social security expenditure are not related to a rise or fall in the level of health and happiness either.

There also appears to be no connection between the size of state welfare and equality in well-being among citizens of the state. In countries where social security expenditure is high, the dispersion of health and happiness is not smaller than in equally prosperous countries with less social insurance spending. Again, increases and reductions in social security expenditure are not linked with equality in health and happiness among citizens.

This counterintuitive result raises five questions: (1) Is this really true? (2) If so, what could explain this lack of effect? (3) Why is it so difficult to believe this result? (4) How should this information affect social policy? (5) What can we learn from further research?

happiness life expectancy health equality welfare state comparative 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Apples, A., H. Bosma, V. Graubauskas, A. Gostaukas, and F. Sturmans. (1996). “Self-Rated Health and Mortality in a Lithuanian and a Dutch Population.” Social Science and Medicine 42, 681–689.Google Scholar
  2. Bartley, M., D. Blane, and S. Montgomery. (1997). “Health and the Life-Course: Why Safety Nets Matter.” British Medical Journal 314, 1194–1196.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, R., and W. Lauterbach. (1997). “Wohlfahrtsstaatentwicklung und Lebenserwartung in Ost-und Westdeutschland.” In R. Becker (ed.), Generationen und sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, pp. 199–231.Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E., E. Sandvik, L. Seidlitz, and M. Diener. (1993). “The Relationship Between Income and Subjective Wellbeing: Relative or Absolute?” Social Indicators Research 28, 195–223.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E., and F. Fujita. (1997). “Social Comparisons and Subjective Wellbeing.” In B. Buunk and R. Gibbons (eds.), Healing, Coping and Wellbeing, Perspectives from Social Comparison Theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 329–358.Google Scholar
  6. DeSwaan, A. (1988). In Care of the State. Health Care, Education andWelfare in Europe and America. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. DiTella, G., R.J. Macculloch, and A.J. Oswald. (1997). The Macro-Economics of Happiness. Center for Economic Performance, Discussion Paper 19. Oxford: Institute of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. Estes, E. (1984). The Social Progress of Nations. New York: Preager.Google Scholar
  9. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fowler, P.C., and D.G. Richards. (1995). “Size of Public Sector and Economic Growth, OECD Countries 1965–85.” International Journal of Social Economy 22, 11–23.Google Scholar
  11. Idler, E.L., and Y. Benyamini. (1997). “Self-Assessed Health and Mortality. A Review of Twenty-Seven Community Studies.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38, 21–37.Google Scholar
  12. ILO. (1996). Cost of Social Security, 14th International Inquiry 1987–1989. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  13. Hagerty, M.R., and R. Veenhoven. (2000). “Wealth and Happiness Revisited.” in preparation.Google Scholar
  14. Headey, B., and A. Wearing. (1992). Understanding Happiness: A Theory of Subjective Well-Being. Melbourne, Australia: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
  15. Headey, B., R.E. Goodin, R. Muffels, and H.J. Dirven. (1997). “Welfare Over Time: Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism in Panel Perspective.” Journal of Public Policy 17, 329–359.Google Scholar
  16. Kunst, A. (1997). Cross-National Comparisons of Socio-Economic Differences in Mortality. Doctoral thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  17. LeGrand, J. (1987). “Inequalities in Health. Some International Comparisons.” European Economic Review 31, 182–191.Google Scholar
  18. Marshall, T.H. (1963). “Citizenship and Social Class.” In Sociology at the Crossroads and Other Essays. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  20. Murray, G. (1984). Losing ground. American Social Policy 1950–1980. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Ouweneel, P. (2000). “State Welfare and Happiness of the Poor, A Cross Nation Comparison.” Erasmus University, in preparation.Google Scholar
  22. Pfaller, A., I. Gough, and G. Therborn. (1991). Can the Welfare State Compete? London: McMillan.Google Scholar
  23. Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pierson, C. (1992). Beyond the Welfare State? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pommer, E., and L. Ruitenberg. (1994). Profijt van de Overheid III. Den Haag: VUGA.Google Scholar
  26. Popenoe, D. (1988). Disturbing the Nest. Family Change and Decline in Modern Society. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  27. UNPD. (1996). Human Development Report 1996. Washington, DC: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
  28. VanMaarseveen, H. (1990). “De Verzekeringsstaat.” Nederlands Juristen Blad 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
  29. VanOorschot, W.J., L. Rabusic, and T. Sirovatka. (1999). In preparation for Czech Journal of Sociology.Google Scholar
  30. VanderVeen, R.J. (1990). De sociale grenzen van beleid. Een onderzoek naar de uitvoering en effecten van het stelsel van sociale zekerheid. Stenfert Kroeze, Leiden.Google Scholar
  31. VanderVeen, R.J. (1998). “Solidarity and Social Security: Effects of Decollectivisation in the Netherlands.” Sociale Wetenschappen 41, 79–90.Google Scholar
  32. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of Happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Veenhoven, R. (1990). “Resultaat van de verzorgingsstaat: Leefbaarheid en gelijkheid.” In H. van de Braak (ed.), Rationaliteit en beleid: Hoofdstukken uit de Rotterdamse sociologie. De Lier: Academisch Boeken Centrum, pp. 41–80.Google Scholar
  34. Veenhoven, R. (1992). “Social Equality and State-Welfare-Effort: More Income-Equality, no More Equality in Quality-of-Life.” Paper presented at the International Sociological Conference “Towards the Good Society,” June 25–26, 1992, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  35. Veenhoven, R. (1993). “Happiness in Nations. Subjective Appreciation of Life in 56 Nations 1946–1992.” RISBO, Erasmus University Rotterdam. Update available http://www.eur.nl/ fsw/research/happiness/nations.Google Scholar
  36. Veenhoven, R. (1994). “Is Happiness a Trait? Test of the Theory that a Better Society Does Not Make People Any Happier.” Social Indicators Research 34, 33–68.Google Scholar
  37. Veenhoven, R. (1995). “The Cross-National Pattern of Happiness. Test of Predictions Implied in Three Theories of Happiness.” Social Indicators Research 34, 33–68.Google Scholar
  38. Veenhoven, R. (1996a). “Happy Life-Expectancy. A Comprehensive Measure of Quality-of-Life in Nations.” Social indicators Research 39, 1–58.Google Scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. (1996b). “The Study of Life-Satisfaction.” In W.E. Saris, R. Veenhoven, A.C. Scherpenzeel, and B. Bunting (eds.), A Comparative Study of Satisfaction with Life in Europe. Budapest: Eötvös University Press, pp. 11–48.Google Scholar
  40. Veenhoven, R. (1996c). “Developments in Satisfaction Research.” Social Indicators Research 37, 1–46.Google Scholar
  41. Veenhoven, R. (2000a). “The Four Qualities of Life.” Journal of Happiness Studies 1 (in press).Google Scholar
  42. Veenhoven, R. (2000b). “Freedom and Happiness. A Comparative Study in 41 Nations in the Early 1990's.” In E. Diener and E. Suh (eds.), Subjective Wellbeing across Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, in press.Google Scholar
  43. Veenhoven, R., and P. Ouweneel. (1995). “Livability of the Welfare State: Appreciation-of-Life and Length-of-Life in Nations Varying in State-Welfare-Effort.” Social Indicators Research 36, 1–14.Google Scholar
  44. WVS. (1994). World Values Survey 2 1990–92, Cumulative file. Ann Arbor, MI: ICPSR, file 6160.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruut Veenhoven
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations