Is there Really Spare Land? A Critique of Estimates of Available Cultivable Land in Developing Countries

  • Anthony Young


Five assessments covering less-developed countries have identified a ‘land balance’, available for future cultivation, using the approach of inventory and difference: assessment of the area cultivable, and subtraction of the area presently cultivated. All arrive at a balance of 1600–1900 Mha, about twice the present cultivated area. The supposed existence of this spare land is widely quoted in forecasts of capacity to meet the food requirements for future population increase. It is argued here that these estimates greatly exaggerate the land available, by over-estimating cultivable land, under-estimating present cultivation, and failing to take sufficient account of other essential uses for land. Personal observation suggests that the true remaining balance of cultivable land is very much smaller, in some regions virtually zero. An order-of-magnitude estimate reaches the conclusion that in a representative area with an estimated ‘land balance’ of 50%, the realistic area is some 3–25% of the cultivable land. This speculation could be tested by directly attempting to find such land in areas where it is supposed to exist. The impression given by current estimates, that a reserve of spare land exists, is misleading to world leaders and policy-makers.

cultivable land cultivated land land balance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allan, W.: 1965, The African Husbandman, London, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
  2. Alexandratos, N.: 1995, World Agriculture: Towards 2010. An FAO Study, Chichester, UK, Wiley, for FAO.Google Scholar
  3. Döös, B.R.: 1994, ‘Environmental degradation, global food production, and risk for larger-scale migrations’, Ambio 23: 124-130.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, L.T.: 1998, Feeding the Ten Billion: Plants and Population Growth, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. FAO: 1970–80, Soil Map of the World 1: 5000. Vols. 1–10, Paris, UNESCO.Google Scholar
  6. FAO: 1978–81, Report on the Agro-ecological Zones Project, FAO World Soil Resources Report 48/1-4, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  7. FAO: 1981, Agriculture: toward 2000, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  8. FAO: 1983, Potential Population Supporting Capacities of Lands in the Developing World, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  9. FAO: 1984, Land, Food and People, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  10. FAO: 1996a, Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  11. FAO: 1996b, World Food Summit: Technical Background Documents 1-15, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  12. FAO: annual, FAO Production Yearbook, Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  13. FAO: ongoing, FAOSTAT (statistical database), World Wide Web site, http:/ Scholar
  14. Fischer, G. and Heilig, G.K.: 1998, ‘Population momentum and the demand on land and water resources’, in D.J. Greenland, P.J. Gregory and P.H. Nye (eds.), Land Resources: on the Edge of the Malthusian Precipice?, Wallingford, UK, CAB International, pp. 9-29.Google Scholar
  15. Greenland, D.J., Gregory, P.J. and Nye, P.H.: 1998a, ‘Introduction and conclusions’, in D.J. Greenland, P.J. Gregory and P.H. Nye (eds.), Land Resources: on the Edge of the Malthusian Precipice?, Wallingford, UK, CAB International, pp. 1-7.Google Scholar
  16. Greenland, D.J., Gregory, P.J. and Nye, P.H.: 1998b, ‘Land resources and constraints to crop production’, in J.C. Waterlow, D.G. Armstrong, L. Fowden and R. Riley (eds.), Feeding a World Population of more than Eight Billion People, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, pp. 39-55.Google Scholar
  17. Luyten, J.C.: 1995, Sustainable World Food Production and Environment, Wageningen, The Netherlands, AB-DLO.Google Scholar
  18. Myers, N.: 1980, Conversion of Tropical Moist Forests, Washington DC, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  19. Oldeman, L.R., Hakkeling, R.T.A. and Sombroek, W.G.: 1990, World Map of the Status of Human-induced Soil Degradation, Wageningen, International Soil Reference and Information Centre (ISRIC) and UNEP.Google Scholar
  20. Pagiola, S.: 1995, Environmental and Natural Resource Degradation in Intensive Agriculture in Bangladesh, World Bank Environment Working Paper 15. Washington DC, World Bank.Google Scholar
  21. Sehgal, J. and Abrol, I.P.: 1992, ‘Land degradation status: India’, Desertification Bulletin (UNEP) 21, 24-31.Google Scholar
  22. Stoorvogel, J.J. and Smaling, E.M.A.: 1990, Assessment of Soil Nutrient Depletion in Sub-saharan Africa: 1983–2000, Staring Centre Report 28. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Staring Centre.Google Scholar
  23. WHO: 1996, Micronutrient Malnutrition — Half the World's Population Affected, World Health Organization 78, 13 November 1996, pp. 1-4.Google Scholar
  24. World Resources Institute, UNEP, UNDP, and World Bank: 1996, World Resources 1996/97, Oxford, UK and New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Young, A.: 1991, ‘Soil monitoring: a basic task for soil survey organizations’, Soil Use and Management 7: 126-130.Google Scholar
  26. Young, A.: 1994, Land Degradation in South Asia: its Severity, Causes and Effects upon the People. FAO World Soil Resources Report 78. Rome, FAO.Google Scholar
  27. Young, A.: 1998, Land Resources: Now and for the Future, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Young, A: in press, ‘Malawi 1959–1999: a 40-year perspective’, Tropical Agriculture Association Newsletter 19(2).Google Scholar
  29. Young, A.: ongoing,, World Wide Web site, Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Young
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK (e-mail

Personalised recommendations