Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 111–140

The RAPPID Project: Symbiosis between Industrial Requirements and MAS Research

  • H. V. D. Parunak
  • J. Sauter
  • M. Fleischer
  • A. Ward
Article

Abstract

The RAPPID project (Responsible Agents for Product-Process Integrated Design) is developing agent-based software tools and methods that use market place dynamics among members of a distributed design team to coordinate set-based design of discrete manufactured products. This report describes the interplay of industrial requirements and Multi-Agent System (MAS) research in the design, implementation, and testing of RAPPID. Like any industrial project, RAPPID begins with the requirements of the problem domain, and draws selectively from research results to meet those requirements. However, the flow of information is not unidirectional. In the process of addressing its requirements, RAPPID developed some new concepts that hold promise for broader application to distributed constraint optimization. RAPPID is work in process, not a completed product, and this report includes an assessment of what needs to be done in addition to what has been accomplished.

manufacturing design set-based design emergent behavior market-based coordination human-computer integration least commitment negotiation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Balasubramanian and D. H. Norrie. “A multiagent architecture for concurrent design, process planning, routing, and scheduling.” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 4–1 pp. 7-16, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. Berker and D. C. Brown. “Conflicts and negotiation in single function agent based design systems.” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 4–1 pp. 17-33, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. H. Clearwater (Ed.). Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation, World Scientific: Singapore, 1996.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Cox, E. Bouchard, and D. Drew. “SBD system design.” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 4–1 pp. 35-46, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. R. Cutkosky, R. S. Englemore, R. E. Fikes, T. R. Gruber, M. R. Genesereth, W. S. Mark, J. M. Tenenbaum, and J. C. Weber. “PACT: An experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems.” IEEE Computer, vol. 26(1) (January) pp. 28-37, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. D'Ambrosio, T. Darr, and W. Birmingham. “Hierarchical concurrent engineering in a multiagent framework.” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 4–1 pp. 47-57, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Hauser and D. Clausing. “The house of quality.” Harvard Business Review, vol. 66 (May–June) pp. 63-73, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Jacquel and J. C. Salmon. “Solving the 3D localization problem for feature agents.” in Proceedings of The 9TH SYMPOSIUM of the International Federation of Automatic Control on INformation COntrol in Manufacturing systems (INCOM'98), 1998.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Klein. “Supporting conflict management in cooperative design teams.” in Proceedings of 11th International Workshop on DAI, pp. 155-181, 1992.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Klein. “Supporting conflict management in cooperative design teams.” Journal on Group Decision and Negotiation, vol. 2 pp. 259-278, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. E. Lander, D. D. Corkill, and S. M. Staley. “Designing integrated engineering environments: blackboard-based integration of design and analysis tools.” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 4–1 pp. 59-71, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. N. Nagel and R. Dove, 21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy, Agility Forum: Bethlehem, PA, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. Navinchandra, Exploration and Innovation in Design: Towards a Computational Model, Springer: New York, NY, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Y. C. Pan and J. M. Tenenbaum. “An intelligent agent framework for enterprise integration,” in Artificial Intelligence Applications in Manufacturing, Famili, Nau, and Kim (Eds.), MIT Press, pp. 349-383, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. V. D. Parunak. “'Go to the ant': Engineering principles from natural agent systems.” Annals of Operations Research, vol. 75 pp. 69-101, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. V. D. Parunak. “Industrial and practical applications of DAI,” in Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence, G. Weiss (Ed.), MIT Press (forthcoming), 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. V. D. Parunak, J. Sauter, and S. J. Clark. “Toward the specification and design of industrial synthetic ecosystems,” in Intelligent Agents IV: Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer: Berlin, pp. 45-59, 1998.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. V. D. Parunak, A. C. Ward, and J. A. Sauter. “A systematic market approach to distributed constraint problems,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'98), 1998.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Sobolewski. “Multiagent knowledge-based environment for concurrent engineering applications.” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 4–1 pp. 89-97, 1996.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. N. Talukdar and P. S. de Souza. “Scale efficient organizations,” in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems Science and Cybernetics, pp. 1458-1463, 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Ward, J. K. Liker, J. J. Cristiano, and D. K. S. II. “The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make better cars faster.” Sloan Management Review, (Spring) pp. 43-61, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. P. Wellman. “A computational market model for distributed configuration design.” AI-EDAM: Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 9–2 pp. 125-134, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Will. “Active Catalogs.” http://www.isi.edu/active-catalog/, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. V. D. Parunak
    • 1
  • J. Sauter
    • 1
  • M. Fleischer
    • 1
  • A. Ward
    • 2
  1. 1.ErimAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Ward SynthesisAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations