Biological Invasions

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 313–323 | Cite as

Experimental Invasions Using Biological Control Introductions: The Influence of Release Size on the Chance of Population Establishment

  • Fritzi S. Grevstad


Introductions of biological control organisms offer a unique opportunity to experimentally study the process of invasion by exotic species. I used two chrysomelid beetles, Galerucella calmariensis and Galerucella pusilla, which are currently being introduced into North America for the biological control of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria), to determine how the initial size of a release affects the probability that the introduced population grows and persists. I released both species into stands of their host plant at 36 sites scattered throughout central New York State using four release sizes: 20, 60, 180, and 540. I returned to these sites over the next 3 years to census the populations. For both species, the probability of population establishment increased with release size. Population growth rates also depended positively on release size. The implication from these results is that the demographic factors whose influence depends on population size or density such as demographic stochasticity, Allee effects, and genetics play important roles in the establishment of invading populations. A second set of releases was used to determine if it was at all possible for a single gravid female to found a population. Out of twenty individual females released, one female (a G. calmariensis) founded a population that persisted until the end of the study (3 generations).

biological control biological invasions colonization Galerucella calmariensis Galerucella pusilla population establishment release size 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allee WC, Park O, Emerson AE, Park T and Schmidt KP (1949) Principles of Animal Ecology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  2. Beirne BP (1985) Avoidable obstacles to colonization in classical biological control of insects. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 743–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blossey B (1995) Coexistence of two leaf-beetles in the same fundamental niche. Distribution, adult phenology and oviposition. Oikos 74: 225–234Google Scholar
  4. Cock MJW (1986) Requirements for biological control: an ecological perspective. Biocontrol News and Information 1: 7–16Google Scholar
  5. Crawley MJ (1986) The population biology of invaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 314: 711–731Google Scholar
  6. Crawley MJ (1987) What makes a community invasible? In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ and Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, Succession and Stability, pp 429–453. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Crowell KL (1973) Experimental zoogeography: introductions of mice to small islands. American Naturalist 107: 535–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennis B (1989) Allee effects: population growth, critical density, and the chance of extinction. Natural Resource Modelling 3: 481–538Google Scholar
  9. Ebenhard T (1989) Bank vole (Chethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780)) propagules of different sizes and island colonization. Journal of Biogeography 16: 173–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elton CS (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabriel W and Bürger R (1992) Survival of small populations under demographic stochasticity. Theoretical Population Biology 41: 44–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodman D (1987) The demography of chance extinction. In: Soulé ME (ed) Viable Populations for Conservation, pp 11–34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Greathead DJ (1971) A review of biological control in the Ethiopian region. Technical Communication No. 5, Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control. Commonwealth Agriculture Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Green RE (1997) The influence of numbers released on the outcome of attempts to introduce exotic bird species to New Zealand. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grevstad FS (1998) The Colonization Ecology of Two Loosestrife Leaf Beetles (Galerucella pusilla and G. calmariensis). PhD thesis. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 170 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Grevstad FS (1999) Factors influencing the chance of population establishment: implications for release strategies in biological control. Ecological Applications (in press)Google Scholar
  17. Grevstad FS and Herzig AL (1997) Quantifying the effects of distance and conspecifics on colonization: experiments and models using the loosestrife leaf beetle Galerucella calmariensis. Oecologia 110: 60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall RW and Ehler LE (1979) Rate of establishment of natural enemies in classical biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 25: 280–282Google Scholar
  19. Harrison S (1989) Long-distance dispersal and colonization in the Bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. Ecology 70: 1236–1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hight SD, Blossey B, Laing J and DeClerck-Floate R (1995) Establishment of insect biological control agents from Europe against Lythrum salicaria in North America. Environmental Entomology 24: 967–977Google Scholar
  21. Hopper KR and Roush RT (1993) Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecological Entomology 18: 321–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leigh EG Jr (1981) The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. Journal of Theoretical Biology 90: 213–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacArthur RH and Wilson EO (1967) The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  24. Mal TK, Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L and Mulligan GA (1992) The biology of Canadian weeds. 100. Lythrum salicaria. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72: 1305–1330Google Scholar
  25. Mayr E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  26. Memmott J, Fowler SV and Hill RL (1998) The effect of release size on the probability of establishment of biological control agents: gorse thrips (Sericothrips staphylinus) released against gorse (Ulex europaeus) in New Zealand. Biocontrol Science and Technology 8: 103–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richter-Dyn N and Goel NS (1972) On the extinction of a colonizing species. Theoretical Population Biology 3: 406–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schoener TW and Schoener A (1983) The time to extinction of a colonizing propagule of lizards increases with island area. Nature 302: 332–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shaffer ML (1981) Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bioscience 31: 131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sheppe W (1965) Island populations and gene flow in the deer mouse, Peromyscus leucopus. Evolution 19: 480–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Simberloff D (1989) Which insect introductions succeed and which fail? In: Drake JA, Mooney HA, di Castri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, Rejmanek M, and Williamson M (eds) Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective, pp 61–75. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  32. Soulé ME (1987) Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  33. Stephan TS and Wissel C (1994) Stochastic extinction models discrete in time. Ecological Modelling 75/76: 183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stuckey RL (1980) Distributional history of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47: 3–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fritzi S. Grevstad
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Ecology and SystematicsCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations