Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 353–373 | Cite as

Futures of Teaching in American Education

  • Linda Darling-Hammond
Article

Abstract

This article argues that factory model schools, created for a time when most individuals were being prepared for relatively low-skilled jobs, are not adequate to the task of educating most citizens for the knowledge work that will increasingly characterize economies of the 21st century. Although many important reforms have been launched over the last decade, countries that have not invested in the development of sophisticated teaching that can adapt to the needs of students and the demands of more challenging content have reached an impasse. Every aspect of school reform – the creation of more challenging curriculum, the use of more performance-based assessments, the implementation of decentralized management, the invention of new model schools and programs – depends on highly-skilled teachers. Policies aimed at developing a quality teaching system include (1) enacting meaningful standards for teachers as well as students, (2) overhauling teacher education and professional development, (3) addressing teacher recruitment problems and placing qualified teachers in all schools, (4) rewarding teacher knowledge and skills, and (5) redesigning schools so that they support teaching and learning. This article describes successful strategies in each of these areas and paints a picture of the alternative futures for education that rest on policies yet to be decided.

Keywords

Teacher Education Teacher Knowledge Knowledge Work Qualified Teacher Educational Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Commission on Youth and America's Future (1988). The Forgotten Half: Non-College-Bound Youth in America. Washington, DC: William T. Grant Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Cremin, L.A. (1965). The Genius of American Education. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  3. Cremin, L.A. (1989). Popular Education and Its Discontents. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990a). Teachers and teaching: Signs of a changing profession. In R. Houston, M. Haberman & J. Sikula (eds), Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 267–290). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Darling-Hammond, L. (1990b). Teacher professionalism: Why and how? In A. Lieberman (ed), Schools as Collaborative Cultures: Creating the Future Now. New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  6. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The Right to Learn: A Blueprint for Creating Schools that Work. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000, January). Teacher quality and student achievement. Educational Policy analysis archives 8 (1): http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.Google Scholar
  8. Ebmeier, H., Twombly, S. & Teeter, D.J. (1991). The comparability and adequacy of financial support for schools of education. Journal of Teacher Education 42(3), 226–235.Google Scholar
  9. Educational Testing Service (1989). Crossroads in American Education. Princeton, NJ: Author.Google Scholar
  10. National Center for Education Statistics (1993). The Condition of Education, 1993.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  11. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future [NCTAF] (1996). Doing What Matters Most: Teaching for America's Future. NY: NCTAF.Google Scholar
  12. National Education Goals Panel [NEGP] (1995). National Educational Goals Report: Improving Education Through Family-School-Community Partnerships. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  13. National Education Goals Panel [NEGP] (1999). The National Education Goals Report: Building a Nation of Learners. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Nelson, F.H. & O'Brien, T. (1993). How U.S. Teachers Measure up Internationally: A Comparative Study of Teacher Pay, Training, and Conditions of Service. Washington, DC: American Federation of TeachersGoogle Scholar
  15. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (1992). Education at a Glance. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  16. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (1995). Education at a Glance. Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  17. Sedlak, M. & Schlossman, S. (1986). Who Will Teach? Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  18. Shulman, L.S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L.S. Shulman & G. Sykes (eds), Handbook of Teaching and Policy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Tyack, D.B. (1974). The One Best System: A History of American Urban Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Darling-Hammond
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EducationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations