Prevention Science

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 125–138 | Cite as

Effects of the “Preparing for the Drug Free Years” Curriculum on Growth in Alcohol Use and Risk for Alcohol Use in Early Adolescence

  • Jisuk Park
  • Rick Kosterman
  • J. David Hawkins
  • Kevin P. Haggerty
  • Terry E. Duncan
  • Susan C. Duncan
  • Richard Spoth

Abstract

Preparing for the Drug-Free Years (PDFY) is a curriculum designed to help parents learn skills to consistently communicate clear norms against adolescent substance use, effectively and proactively manage their families, reduce family conflict, and help their children learn skills to resist antisocial peer influences. This study examined the effects of PDFY on the trajectories of these factors, as well as on the trajectory of alcohol use from early to mid adolescence. The sample consisted of 424 rural families of sixth graders from schools randomly assigned to an intervention or a control condition. Data were collected from both parents and students at pretest, posttest, and 1-, 2- and 3\(\frac{1}{2}\)-year follow-ups. Latent growth models were examined. PDFY significantly reduced the growth of alcohol use and improved parent norms regarding adolescent alcohol use over time. Implications for prevention and evaluation are discussed.

alcohol use prevention adolescence growth modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arbuckle, J. L. (1995). Amos user's guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters.Google Scholar
  2. Baumrind, D., & Moselle, K. A. (1985). A developmental perspective on adolescent drug abuse. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 4(3–4), 41–67.Google Scholar
  3. Benson, P. L., & Roehlkepartain, E. C. (1992). Youth violence in middle America. Source, 13, 1–3.Google Scholar
  4. Blum, R. W., McKay, C., & Resnick, M. D. (1989). The state of adolescent health in Minnesota. Grant #MCH273460, Federal Division of Maternal and Child.Google Scholar
  5. Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1106–1112.Google Scholar
  6. Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. R. (1990). Drugs and predatory crime. In M. Tonry & J. Q. Wilson (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research: Vol. 13. Drugs and crime (pp. 203–239). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Hawkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., Ramey, S. L., Shure, M. B., & Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention.Aconceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48, 1013–1022.Google Scholar
  10. Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., Elder, G. H., Lorenz, F. O., et al. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63, 526–541.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, S. C., & Duncan, T. E. (1994). Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 313–338.Google Scholar
  12. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Ellickson, P. L., Hays, R. D., & Bell, R. M. (1992). Stepping through the drug use sequence: Longitudinal scalogram analysis of initiation and regular use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101, 441–451.Google Scholar
  14. Gillmore, M. R., Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., Jr., Day, L. E., Moore, M., & Abbott, R. (1991). Structure of problem behaviors in preadolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 499–506.Google Scholar
  15. Goldstein, P. J., Brownstein, H. H., & Ryan, P. J. (1992). Drug related homicide in New York: 1984 and 1988. Crime and Delinquency, 38, 459–476.Google Scholar
  16. Hawkins, J. D., Arthur, M. W., & Catalano, R. F. (1995). Preventing substance abuse. In M. Tonry & D. Farrington (Eds.), Crime and Justice: Vol. 19. Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (pp. 343–427). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64–105.Google Scholar
  18. Hawkins, J. D., Graham, J. W., Maguin, E., Abbott, R., Hill, K. G., & Catalano, R. F. (1997). Exploring the effects of age of alcohol use initiation and psychosocial risk factors on subsequent alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 280–290.Google Scholar
  19. Hingson, R., & Strunin, L. (1992). Monitoring adolescents' response to the AIDS epidemic: Changes in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors. In J. D. Ralph (Ed.), Adolescents and AIDS: A generation in jeopardy (pp. 17–33). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Hops, H., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (1995). A course for the treatment of depression among adolescents. In K. D. Craig & K. S. Dobson (Eds.), Anxiety and depression in adults and children (pp. 230–245). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1993). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1992: Vol. 1. Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 93-3597). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1998). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1997. Volume 1: Secondary school students. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  23. Kandel, D. B., Yamaguchi, K., & Chen, K. (1992). Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the gateway theory. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 53, 447–457.Google Scholar
  24. Kingery, P. M., Pruitt, B. E., & Hurley, R. S. (1992). Violence and 138 Park, Kosterman, Hawkins, Haggerty, Duncan, Duncan, and Spoth illegal drug use among adolescents: Evidence from the U.S. National Adolescent Student Health Survey. International Journal of the Addictions, 27, 1445–1464.Google Scholar
  25. Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Haggerty, K. P., Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (in press). Preparing for the Drug Free Years: Session-specific effects of a universal parent-training intervention with rural families. Journal of Drug Education. Google Scholar
  26. Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Spoth, R., Haggerty, K. P., & Zhu, K. (1997). Effects of a preventive parent-training intervention on observed family interactions: Proximal outcomes from preparing for the drug free years. Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 337–352.Google Scholar
  27. Leigh, B. C. (1990). Alcohol and unsafe sex: An overview of research and theory. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research, 325, 35–46.Google Scholar
  28. Lempers, J. D., Clark-Lempers, D., & Simons, R. L. (1989). Economic hardship, parenting, and distress in adolescence. Child Development, 60, 25–39.Google Scholar
  29. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989). The analysis of social science data with missing values. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 292–326.Google Scholar
  31. McGinnis, J. M., & Foege, W. H. (1999). Mortality and morbidity attributable to use of addictive substances in the United States. Proceedings of the Association of American Physicians, 111(2), 109–118.Google Scholar
  32. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.Google Scholar
  33. Muthén, B. O. (1991). Analysis of longitudinal data using latent variable models with varying parameters. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 1–17). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  34. Muthén, B., & Curran, P. (1997). General growth modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2, 371–402.Google Scholar
  35. National Center for Health Statistics. (1990). Advance report of final mortality statistics, 1988. Monthly Vital Statistics Report, 39(7 Suppl.).Google Scholar
  36. Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988a). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact on the lives of young adults. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1988b). Impact of adolescent drug use and social support on problems of young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 64–75.Google Scholar
  38. Newcomb, M. D., Bentler, P. M., & Collins, C. (1986). Alcohol use and dissatisfaction with self and life:Alongitudinal analysis of young adults. Journal of Drug Issues, 16, 479–494.Google Scholar
  39. Redmond, C., Spoth, R., Shin, C., & Lepper, H. (1999). Modeling long-term parent outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: One year follow-up results. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 975–984.Google Scholar
  40. Rice, D. P. (1999). Economic costs of substance abuse, 1995. Proceedings of the Association of American Physicians, 111(2), 119–125.Google Scholar
  41. Robins, L. N., & Przybeck, T. R. (1985). Age of onset of drug use as a factor in drug and other disorders. In C. L. Jones & R. J. Battjes (Eds.), National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series: Vol. 56. Etiology of drug abuse: Implications for prevention (pp. 178–192).Google Scholar
  42. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. Spoth, R., & Conroy, S. (1993). Survey of prevention-relevant beliefs and efforts to enhance parenting skills among rural parents. The Journal of Rural Health, 9, 227–239.Google Scholar
  43. Spoth, R., Goldberg, C., & Redmond, C. (1999). Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: Discretetime survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 157–163.Google Scholar
  44. Spoth, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Goldberg, C. J. (1995a). Parent reported risk and protective factors for substance use among Iowa elementary and middle school children. Report to the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention and the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment for the Iowa Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
  45. Spoth, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Goldberg, C. J. (1995b). Teacher perceptions of risk and protective factors for substance use among Iowa K-8 school children. Report to the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention and the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment for the Iowa Department of Public Health.Google Scholar
  46. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1993). Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: Illustrative results from a parent sample. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8, 124–133.Google Scholar
  47. Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1994). Effective recruitment of parents into family-focused prevention research:Acomparison of two strategies. Psychology and Health: An International Journal, 9, 353–370.Google Scholar
  48. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Haggerty, K., & Ward, T. (1995). A controlled parenting skills outcome study examining individual difference and attendance effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 449–464.Google Scholar
  49. Spoth, R. L., Redmond, C., Kahn, J. H., & Shin, C. (1997). A prospective validation study of inclination, belief, and context predictors of family-focused prevention involvement. Family Process, 36, 403–429.Google Scholar
  50. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1998). Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal familyfocused preventive interventions: Extending a public healthoriented research base. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 385–399.Google Scholar
  51. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., & Huck, S. (1999). A protective process model of parent-child affective quality and child mastery effects on oppositional behaviors: A test and replication. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 49–71.Google Scholar
  52. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Shin, C., Lepper, H., Haggerty, K., & Wall, M. (1998). Risk moderation of parent and child outcomes in a preventive intervention: A test and replication. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 565–579.Google Scholar
  53. Spoth, R., Redmond, C., Yoo, S., & Dodge, K. (1993). Sociodemographic factors and parent beliefs relevant to the prevention of adolescent behavior problems. Family Perspective, 27, 285–303.Google Scholar
  54. Spoth, R. L., Reyes, M. L., Redmond, C., & Shin, C. (1999). Assessing a public health approach to delay onset and progression of adolescent substance use: Latent transition and loglinear analyses of longitudinal family preventive intervention outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 619–630.Google Scholar
  55. Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363–381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Prevention Research 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jisuk Park
    • 1
  • Rick Kosterman
    • 1
  • J. David Hawkins
    • 1
  • Kevin P. Haggerty
    • 1
  • Terry E. Duncan
    • 2
  • Susan C. Duncan
    • 2
  • Richard Spoth
    • 3
  1. 1.Social Development Research Group, School of Social WorkUniversity of WashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Oregon Research InstituteEugene
  3. 3.Institute for Social and Behavioral ResearchIowa State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations