Ethics and Information Technology

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 275–281 | Cite as

KDD: The challenge to individualism

  • Anton Vedder


KDD (Knowledge Discovery in Databases) confronts us withphenomena that can intuitively be grasped as highly problematic, but arenevertheless difficult to understand and articulate. Many of theseproblems have to do with what I call the ``deindividualization of theperson'': a tendency of judging and treating persons on the basis ofgroup characteristics instead of on their own individual characteristicsand merits. This tendency will be one of the consequences of theproduction and use of group profiles with the help of KDD. Currentprivacy law and regulations, as well as current ethical theoryconcerning privacy, start from too narrow a definition of ``personaldata'' to capture these problems. In this paper, I introduce the notionof ``categorical privacy'' as a starting point for a possible remedy forthe failures of the current conceptions of privacy. I discuss some waysin which the problems relating to group profiles definitely cannot besolved and I suggest a possible way out of these problems. Finally, Isuggest that it may take us a step forward if we would begin to questionthe predominance of privacy norms in the social debate on informationtechnologies and if we would be prepared to introduce normativeprinciples other than privacy rules for the assessment of newinformation technologies. If we do not succeed in articulating theproblems relating to KDD clearly, one day we may find ourselves in asituation where KDD appears to have undermined the methodic andnormative individualism which pervades the mainstream of morality andmoral theory.


Information System User Interface Knowledge Discovery Human Computer Interaction Current Conception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. U. Fayyad, G. Piatesky-Shapiro and P. Smyth. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: Towards a Unifying Framework. In E. Simoudis, J. Hian and U. Fayyad, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. AAAI Press / MIT Press, Menlo Park, Cal., 1996.Google Scholar
  2. W. J. Frawley, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro and C. J. Matheus. Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview. In G. Piatetsky-Shapiro and W. J. Frawley, editors, Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, Cal, Cambridge, Mass/London, 1991.Google Scholar
  3. M. Hartney. Some Confusions Concerning Collective Rights. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 4: 293–314, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. J. Harvey. Stereotypes and Group-claims: Epistemological and Moral Issues and Their Implications for Multiculturalism in Education. Journal of Philosophy and Education 24: 39–50, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. J. Johnson. Privacy, Liberty and Integrity. Public Affairs Quarterly 3: 15–34, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. J. Johnson. A Theory of the Nature and Value of Privacy. Public Affairs Quarterly 6: 271–288, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. W. A. Parent, Recent Work on the Concept of Privacy. American Philosophical Quarterly 20: 341–356, 1983.Google Scholar
  8. A. H. Vedder. The Values of Freedom. Thesis, Utrecht University, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. A. H. Vedder. Privatization, Information Technology and Privacy: Reconsidering the Social Responsibilities of Organizations. In Geoff Moore, editor, Business Ethics: Principles and Practice, pp. 215–226. Business Education Publishers, Sunderland, 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Vedder
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Law / Eindhoven University of Technology, Faculty of Technology ManagementTilburg UniversityThe Netherlands. E-mail

Personalised recommendations