Anonymity versus commitment: The dangers of education on the internet
I shall translate Kierkegaard's account of the dangers and opportunities of what he called the Press into a critique of the Internet so as to raise the question: what contribution -- for good or ill -- can the World Wide Web, with its ability to deliver vast amounts of information to users all over the world, make to educators trying to pass on knowledge and to develop skills and wisdom in their students? I will then use Kierkegaard's three-stage answer to the problem of lack of involvement posed by the Press -- his claim that to have a meaningful life the learner must pass through the aesthetic, the ethical and the religious spheres of existence -- to suggest that only the first two stages -- the aesthetic and the ethical -- can be implemented with Information Technology, while the final stage, which alone makes meaningful learning possible, is undermined rather than supported by the tendencies of the desituated and anonymous Net.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Patricia Benner. From Novice to Expert, Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice. Reading, Addison-Wesley, 1984.Google Scholar
- Michael G. Dolence and Donald M. Norris. Transforming Higher Education. Society for College and University Planning, 1995.Google Scholar
- S. Kierkegaard. The Present Age. Translated separately by Alexander Dru, New York, Harper and Row, 1962.Google Scholar
- S. Kierkegaard. Journals and Papers. Paper IX A 378, 1848. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Bloomington, Indiana University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
- S. Kierkegaard. The Sickness unto Death. Translated by Alastair Nannay. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1989.Google Scholar
- S. Kierkegaard. Either/Or. Translated by Alastair Hanney. Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1992.Google Scholar
- Lewis J. Perelman. School's Out Avon/Education, 1993.Google Scholar