Advertisement

Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 3–24 | Cite as

The Development of Teacher Leaders and Inservice Teacher Educators

  • Ruhama Even
Article

Abstract

This article discusses the development of teacher leaders and inservice teacher educators whose role it is to promote teacher learning about mathematics teaching in the process of changing school mathematics. The Manor Program for the development of teacher leaders and teacher educators is used as a vehicle for addressing this issue. The article focuses on aspects of curriculum design, discusses the theoretical rationale for the learning opportunities provided by the program, and considers several problematic aspects encountered.

Keywords

Manor Program Teacher Educator Mathematics Teaching Education Research School Mathematic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Australian Education Council (1990). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, M. & Vinner, S. (1990). Some misconceptions in calculus: Anecdotes or the tip of an iceberg? In G. Booker, P. Cobb & T.N. de Mendicuti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th international conference for the psychology of mathematics education, Vol. 1 (37-44). Mexico: Program Committee.Google Scholar
  3. Arcavi, A. (1994). Symbol sense: Informal sense-making in formal mathematics. For the learning of mathematics, 14(3), 24-35.Google Scholar
  4. Arcavi, A. & Schoenfeld, A.H. (1988). On the meaning of variable. Mathematics Teacher, 81, 420-427.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, B. & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and teacher education, 5, 483-497.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, A. & Janvier C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the learning of mathematics, 2(1), 34-42.Google Scholar
  7. Ben-Zvi, D. & Friedlander, A. (1997). Statistical thinking in a technological environment. In J.B. Garfield & G. Burrill (Eds.), Proceedings of the international association for statistical education round table conference (45-55). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.Google Scholar
  8. Clarke, D.M. (1993). Influences on the changing role of the mathematics teacher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  9. Cobb, P., Wood, T. & Yackel, E. (1990). Classrooms as learning environments for teachers and researchers. In R.B. Davis, C.A. Maher & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (125-146). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, D.K. & Barnes, C.A. (1993). Pedagogy and policy. In D.K. Cohen, M.W. McLaughlin & J.E. Talbert (Eds.), Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice (207-239). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for research in mathematics education, 24, 94-116.Google Scholar
  12. Even, R. (1994). Tel-Aviv project for improving mathematics teaching in junior-high schools: A teacher development approach (1990-1993). Unpublished manuscript, Rehovot, Israel: Weizmann Institute of Science (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  13. Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. Journal of mathematical behavior, 17(1), 105-121.Google Scholar
  14. Even, R. & Lappan, G. (1994). Constructing meaningful understanding of mathematics content. In D.B. Aichele & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics, 1994 Yearbook (128-143). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  15. Fullan, M.G. (1990). Staff development, innovation, and institutional development. In B. Joyce (Ed.), Changing school culture through staff development (3-25). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum and Development.Google Scholar
  16. Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.Google Scholar
  17. Hanna, G. (1990). Some pedagogical aspects of proof. Interchange, 21(1), 6-13.Google Scholar
  18. Harper, E. (1987). Ghosts of Diophantus. Educational studies in mathematics, 18, 75-90.Google Scholar
  19. Hershkowitz, R. (1990). Psychological aspects of learning geometry. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition (70-95). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hershkowitz, R. & Schwarz, B.B. (1995). Reflective processes in a technology-based mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San-Francisco.Google Scholar
  21. Küchemann, D.E. (1981). Algebra. In K.M. Hart (Ed.), Children's understanding of mathematics (102-119). London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  22. Lappan, G., Fitzgerald, W., Phillips, E., Winter, M.J., Lanier, P., Madsen-Nason, A., Even, R., Lee, B, Smith, J. & Weinberg, D. (1988). The middle grades mathematics project final report to the National Science Foundation for grant #MDR8318218. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, L. & Wheeler, D. (1986). High school students' conception of justification in algebra. In G. Lappan & R. Even (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh annual meeting of the PME-NA (94-101). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  24. Leinhardt, G., Young, K.M. & Merriman, J. (1995). Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction 5, 401-408.Google Scholar
  25. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P.W., Love, N. & Stiles, K.E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  26. McLaughlin, M.W. (1991). Enabling professional development: What have we learned? In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the 90s (61-82). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  28. Romberg, T.A. (1984). School mathematics: Options for the 1990's. Chairman's report of a conference. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  29. Romberg, T.A. & Pitnam, A.J. (1990). Curricular materials and pedagogical reform: Teachers' perspective and use of time in the teaching of mathematics. In R. Bromme & M. Ben-Peretz (Eds.), Time for teachers: Time in schools from the practitioner's perspective (189-226). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sfard, A. (1995). The development of algebra: Confronting historical and psychological perspectives. Journal of mathematical behavior, 14, 15-39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sfard, A. & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification-the case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics 26, 191-228.Google Scholar
  32. Superior Committee on Science Mathematics and Technology Education in Israel (1992). Tomorrow 98: Report. Jerusalem, ISRAEL: Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (English edition: 1994).Google Scholar
  33. Tall, D.O. & Schwarzenberger, R.L.E. (1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44-49.Google Scholar
  34. Tirosh, D., Even, R. & Robinson, N. (1998). Simplifying algebraic expressions: Teacher awareness and teaching approaches. Educational studies in mathematics, 35, 51-64.Google Scholar
  35. Vinner, S. & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for research in mathematics education, 20, 356-366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruhama Even
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Science TeachingWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations