Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 269–292 | Cite as

Towards a Useful Philosophy of Biochemistry: Sketches and Examples

  • Roger Strand

Abstract

Scientific development influences philosophical thought, and vice versa. If philosophy is to be of any use to the production, evaluation or application of biochemical knowledge, biochemistry will have to explicate its needs. This paper concentrates on the need for a philosophical analysis of methodological challenges in biochemistry, above all the problematic relation between in vitro experiments and the desire for in vivo knowledge. This problem receives much attention within biochemistry, but the focus is on practical detail. It is discussed how a theoretical analysis can go beyond a naïve understanding of scientific success and failure in such cases. Several examples are presented to elucidate this issue, including the methodological implications of the precautionary principle, the possible interplay between theoretical methodology of biochemistry and the science studies, and the methodological complexities related to experimental protocol standardisation and use of instruments and kits.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. D. Allchin, How Do You Falsify a Question? Crucial Tests versus Crucial Demonstrations. PSA 1: 74–88, 1992.Google Scholar
  2. W. Bechtel and R.C. Richardson, Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.Google Scholar
  3. R.M. Burian, How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice. Journal of the History of Biology 26: 351–367, 1993.Google Scholar
  4. R.M. Burian, Underappreciated Pathways Toward Molecular Genetics as Illustrated by Jean Brachet's Cytochemical Embryology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
  5. C. De Duve, Principles of Tissue Fractionation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 6: 33–59, 1964.Google Scholar
  6. J.H. Fujimura, Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.Google Scholar
  7. S. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.Google Scholar
  8. S.R. Glasser, F. Chytil and T.C. Spelsberg, Early Effects of Oestradiol-17β on the Chromatin and Activity of the Deoxyribonucleic Acid-dependent Ribonucleic Acid Polymerases (I and II) of the Rat Uterus. Biochemical Journal 130: 947–957, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. I. Hacking, The Participant Irrealist At Large in the Laboratory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 277–294, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. H. Hillman, Certainty and Uncertainty in Biochemical Techniques, Surrey University Press, Henley-on-Thames, 1972.Google Scholar
  12. R. Hirschelmann, C.V. Rein, A. Springer and U. Graefe, Mode of Action of Antiinflammatory Agents: Relation Between Arachidonic Acid Metabolism and Hydrogen Peroxide Production. European Journal of Pharmacology 183: 2254–2255, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. R. Hirschelmann, Mode of Action of Antiinflammatory Agents: The Problem of Data Interpretation After Experiments In vivo/Ex Vivo, In Situ and In Vitro. Naunyn-Schiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 344(Suppl. 2): R110, 1991.Google Scholar
  14. L.E. Kay, The Molecular Vision of Life. Caltech, The Rockfeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  15. E.F. Keller, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Science and Culture, Routledge, New York, NY, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1970.Google Scholar
  17. B. Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1987.Google Scholar
  18. B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986.Google Scholar
  19. National Research Council, Models for Biomedical Research. A New Perspective, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1985.Google Scholar
  20. J. Philpot and J. Stanier, The Choice of the Suspension Medium for Rat-liver-cell Nuclei. Biochemical Journal 63: 214–223, 1956.Google Scholar
  21. A. Pickering, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. N.C. Price and L. Stevens, Fundamentals of Enzymology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. R.S. Read and C.M. Mauritzen, Isolation and Preservation of Cell Nuclei for Studies on RNA Polymerase Activity. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 48: 559–565, 1970.Google Scholar
  24. H.J. Rheinberger, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  25. I.G. Skripal and V.V. Babivhev, [Increase in the In Vitro Activity of Mollicute Transcriptase Using Substances of an Organic Nature (in Russian)]. Mikrobiol. Zhurnal (Kiev) 51: 19–23, 1989.Google Scholar
  26. R. Strand, R. Bøe and T. Flatmark. The Choice of Resuspension Medium for Isolated Rat Liver Nuclei: Effects on Nuclear Morphology and In Vitro Transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 139: 149–157, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. R. Strand, R. Fjelland and T. Flatmark, In Vivo Interpretation of In Vitro Effect Studies with a Detailed Analysis of the Method of In Vitro Transcription in Isolated Cell Nuclei. Acta Biotheoretica 44: 1–21, 1996.Google Scholar
  28. R. Strand, Theoretical Methodology in Biochemistry. Dissertation, Megaloceros Press, Bergen, 1998.Google Scholar
  29. S. Toulmin, The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction, Hutchinson University Library, London, 1953.Google Scholar
  30. C.A. Tyson and J.M. Frazier, Methods in Toxicology. I. In Vitro Biological Systems, Academic Press, London, 1993.Google Scholar
  31. O.K. Vintermyr and S.O. Døskeland, Cell Cycle Parameters of Adult Rat Hepatocytes in a Defined Medium. A Note on the Timing of Nucleolar DNA Replication. Journal of Cell Physiology 132: 12–21, 1987.Google Scholar
  32. S. Wold, M. Sjöström, R. Carlson, T. Lundstedt, S. Hellberg, B. Skagerberg, C. Wikström and J. Öhman, Multivariate Design. Analytica Chimica Acta 191: 17–32, 1986.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Strand
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of the Sciences and the HumanitiesUniversity of BergenBergenNorway E-mail

Personalised recommendations