Ethical Theory & Moral Practice

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 181–199 | Cite as

On Language Rights

  • Eerik Lagerspetz

Abstract

In social and political philosophy, linguistic differences are usually seen as one item in the long and indefinite list of Cultural Differences; consequently, language rights are discussed and criticized together with other cultural rights. In this essay, it is argued that a right to use one's own language can be justified by appeal to the practical role of language in human life. The ability to communicate effectively is essential for human autonomy and well-being; thus there is no need to argue that linguistic groups, as groups, are entitled to special treatment, or that language rights are ‘group rights’. Because learning a new language is invariably a costly matter, by recognizing some languages as official languages the state (re)distributes burdens and benefits among its citizens. The task of language rights is to guarantee that these burdens are not distributed in a too unequal way.

group rights language rights liberalism national minorities nationalism neutrality of state 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bradley, F.H., “My Station and Its Duties” in Ethical Studies. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1876/1951, pp. 195–220.Google Scholar
  2. Denitch, B.D., “National Identity, Politics, and Democracy,” Social Science Information, 35 (1996), pp. 459–483.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, J., “Introduction” in J. Edwards (ed.), Linguistic Minorities, Policies, and Pluralism. London: Academic Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  4. Graff, J.A., “Human Rights, Peoples, and the Right to Self-Determination” in J. Baker (ed.), Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 186–214.Google Scholar
  5. Hartney, M., “Some Confusions Concerning Collective Rights” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 202–227.Google Scholar
  6. Kymlicka, W., Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. Kymlicka, W., “Individual and Community Rights” in J. Baker (ed.), Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
  8. Lagerspetz, E., The Opposite Mirrors. An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.Google Scholar
  9. Nimni, E., “Marx, Engels, and the National Question” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar
  10. Réaume, D.G., “The Group Right to Linguistic Security: Whose Right, What Duties?” in J. Baker (ed.), Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1994, pp. 118–141.Google Scholar
  11. Réaume, D.G., “The Intrinsic Value of Language: Justifying the Right to Comprehensive Official Language Use in the Courts”, forthcoming, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. Spinner, J., The Boundaries of Citizenship. Race, Ethnicity and Nationality in a Liberal State. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Taylor, C., Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  14. Waldron J., “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 93–119.Google Scholar
  15. Walzer, M., “Pluralism: A Political Perspective” in W. Kymlicka (ed.), The Rights of Minority Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar
  16. Watson, M., “Conclusion: The 1970s, 1980s and Beyond” in M. Watson (ed.), Contemporary Minority Nationalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1990, pp. 195–220.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eerik Lagerspetz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of JyvaskyläJyvaskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations