Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 87–115 | Cite as

In Defense of Individualism

  • Eric Mack

Abstract

This paper offers a programmatic philosophical articulation of moral and political individualism. This individualism consists of two main components: value individualism and rights individualism. The former is the view that, for each individual, the end which is of ultimate value is his own well-being. Each individual's well-being has ultimate agent-relative value and the only ultimate values are these agent-relative values. The latter view is that individuals possess moral jurisdiction over themselves, i.e., rights of self-ownership. These rights (along with other rights individuals may come to possess) constrain the manner in which agents may pursue value. For this reason, the articulated individualism is an constrained individualism. Sketches of arguments are offered for both value and rights individualism. And it is argued that the sole legitimate function of legal/political institutions is to further delineate and protect the rights of individuals. However, the paper is also concerned to indicate why this radical moral and political individualism does not have many of the features or implications that are commonly ascribed to it. In this connection, I seek to show how this social doctrine accords with individuals' having concern for the well-being of others, with the emergence of relationships among individuals that have both instrumental and non-instrumental value, with a degree of responsibility for self and others that is often thought to be antithetical to individualism and, in general, with a flourishing of civil order.

agent-relativity civil society emergent order individualism moral side-constraints rights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. M. Ostwald. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar
  2. Hare, R.M., Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  3. Hayek, F.A., Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948.Google Scholar
  4. Hayek, F.A., New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Holmes, S., The Anatomy of Antiliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  6. Locke, J., A Letter Concerning Toleration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1990.Google Scholar
  7. Lomasky, L., Persons, Rights and the Moral Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  8. Lomasky, L., Liberal Autonomy, Philosophy and Theology 4 (Spring 1990), pp. 297–309.Google Scholar
  9. Mack, E., Self-Ownership and the Right of Property, The Monist 73 (4) (1990), pp. 519–543.Google Scholar
  10. Mack, E., Agent-relativity, Deontic Restraints, and Self-ownership, in R. Frey and C. Morris (eds.), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 209–232.Google Scholar
  11. Mack, E., Moral Individualism and Libertarian Theory, in T.R. Machan and D. Rasmussen (eds.), Liberty in the 21st Century. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield, 1995, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar
  12. Mill, J.S., Utilitarianism. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1957.Google Scholar
  13. Moore, G.E., Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  14. Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. Phillips, D.L., Looking Backward. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  16. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  17. Selznick, P., Civilizing Civil Society, in A. van Harskamp, A.W. Musschenga & L. Halman (eds.), Individualism, Civil Society and Civil Religion (this volume 1999).Google Scholar
  18. Smart, J.J.C., An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics, in J.J.C. Smart and Bernard Williams (eds), Utilitarianism For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. van Gunsteren, H., 'The Cement of Society': Theory or Theology, (this volume 1999).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Mack
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Newcom HallTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations