Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 423–445 | Cite as

Understanding the Moral Phenomenology of the Third Reich

  • Geoffrey Scarre
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the issue of German moral responsibility for the Holocaust in the light of the thesis of Daniel Goldhagen and others that inherited negative stereotypes of Jews and Jewishness were prime causal factors contributing to the genocide. It is argued that in so far as the Germans of the Third Reich were dupes of an 'hallucinatory ideology,' they strikingly exemplify the 'paradox of moral luck' outlined by Thomas Nagel, that people are not morally responsible for what they are and are not responsible for. The implications of this paradox for the appraisal of German guilt are explored in relation to the views of a number of recent writers on the Holocaust.

evil Goldhagen Holocaust ideology luck and blindness moral responsibility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem; A Report on the Banality of Evil. London: Faber & Faber, 1963.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, Hannah, The Life of the Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovitch, 1978.Google Scholar
  3. Bankier, David, The Germans and the Final Solution. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. Bartov, Omar, Murder in our Midst: The Holocaust, Industrial Killing and Representation. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  5. Beehler, Roger, 'Moral delusion,' Philosophy, 56, 1981, pp. 313-331.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, Jonathan, 'The conscience of Huckleberry Finn,' Philosophy, 49, 1974, pp. 123-134.Google Scholar
  7. Browning, Christopher R., Ordinary Men. Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Harper Perennial, 1992.Google Scholar
  8. Bullock, Alan, Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. London: BCA in association with Harper Collins, 1991.Google Scholar
  9. Cohn, Norman, Warrant for Genocide. London: Serif, 1996Google Scholar
  10. Fackenheim, Emil L., 'The Holocaust and philosophy,' Journal of Philosophy, 82, 1985, pp. 505-514.Google Scholar
  11. Fackenheim Emil L., 'Holocaust and Weltanschauung: philosophical reflections on why they did it,' in The God Within: Kant, Schelling, and Historicity, Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1996, pp. 172-185.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, Michael, 'The Holocaust and philosophy,' Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12, 1995, pp. 125-128.Google Scholar
  13. Geras, Norman, 'Richard Rorty and the righteous among the nations,' Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12, 1995, pp. 151-173.Google Scholar
  14. Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. London: Little, Brown & Co., 1996Google Scholar
  15. Graml, Hermann, Antisemitism in the Third Reich. Translated by Kirk, Tim. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Hampshire, Stuart, Innocence and Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. Hitler, Adolf, Mein Kampf. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Hoess, Rudolf, Commandant of Auschwitz. Translated by FitzGibbon, Constance. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1959.Google Scholar
  19. Hume, David, Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, in Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, ed Selby-Bigge, LA. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1902.Google Scholar
  20. Kekes, John, Facing Evil. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  21. Landau, Ronnie S, The Nazi Holocaust. Chicago: Ivan R Dee, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. Lang, Berel, 'Uniqueness and explanation,' Journal of Philosophy, 82, 1985, pp. 514-515.Google Scholar
  23. Lang, Berel, Act and Idea in the Nazi Genocide. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  24. Marrus, Michael R., The Holocaust in History. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. Nagel, Thomas, 'Moral Luck,' in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  26. Outka, Gene and Reeder, John P., eds. Prospects for a Common Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  27. Plato: Meno (many editions).Google Scholar
  28. Plato: Protagoras (many editions).Google Scholar
  29. Plato: Gorgias (many editions).Google Scholar
  30. Proctor, Robert N., Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  31. Rorty, Richard, 'Truth and freedom: a reply to Thomas McCarthy,' in Outka and Reeder(1993), pp. 179-189.Google Scholar
  32. Statman, Daniel, ed. Moral Luck. New York: SUNY Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  33. Steiner, Hillel, Persons of lesser value: moral argument and “Final Solution”,' Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12, 1995, pp. 129-141.Google Scholar
  34. Sterba, James P., 'Understanding evil: American slavery, the Holocaust, and the conquest of the American Indians,' Ethics, 106, 1996, pp. 424-448.Google Scholar
  35. Stout, Jeffrey, 'On having a morality in common,' in Outka and Reeder, 1993, pp. 191-214.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, Laurence Mordekhai, Vessels of Evil: American Slavery and the Holocaust. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, Bernard, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, Bernard, 'Moral luck,' in Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey Scarre
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations