Journal of Management and Governance

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 357–379

National Networks of Corporate Power: An Irish Perspective

  • Leo Mac Canna
  • Niamh Brennan
  • Eleanor O'Higgins


This paper maps the network of interlocking directorships formed by the boards of the top 50 financial and 200 non-financial companies in Ireland. The Irish network is compared with those in ten countries, based on the same sample size and selection criteria as used in this paper, using the methods and theory of Social Network Analysis (SNA). Fundamental to the paper is the idea that the network of interlocking directorates is in some way structured, and not the result of random processes.

Irish boards were found to have a relatively loosely connected network structure which is sparser and less dense than those of other countries. This is reflected in the relatively low percentage of multiple directors and the relatively fewer number of directorships per multiple director.

In general, indigenous Irish public companies tended to be central in the network, while a disproportionately large number of foreign and private companies were isolated on the periphery. However, a number of foreign-owned companies were central to the network -- in particular, those which started as indigenous Irish companies which were subsequently taken over.

When account is taken of the nature of the Irish economy and business, in comparison with that of the ten other countries, it is seen that the opportunities for company interlinking at board level in Ireland are relatively fewer. However, within these constraints, there is a thriving network of corporate power in Ireland.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, M.P.: 1974, “The Structure of Interorganizational Elite Cooperation: Interlocking Corporate Directorates”, American Sociological Review 39(June): 393–406.Google Scholar
  2. Bishop, M.: 1994, “The Way Ahead – Corporate Governance will Improve Everywhere but at Different Speeds”, The Economist 330(29 January).Google Scholar
  3. Boardroom Centre: 1988, The Non-Executive Director: Roles and Responsibilities (Dublin: Boardroom Centre).Google Scholar
  4. Brennan, N. and J. McCafferty: 1997, “Corporate Governance Practices in Irish Companies”, Irish Business and Administrative Research 18: 114–133.Google Scholar
  5. Buchanan-Barrow, P.: 1993, “Boardrooms Today: How Do You Measure Up?”, Executive Development 6(3): 8–10.Google Scholar
  6. Burdett, J.O.: 1991, “How to Build a Business Network”, Executive Development 4(4): 8–9.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, R.J.: 1994, “Women on Corporate Boards of Directors: Forces for Change?”, Women in Management Review 9(1): 27–31.Google Scholar
  8. Business & Finance: 1994, “Top 1 000 Companies”, Business & Finance 27 January (Dublin: Belenos Publications Limited).Google Scholar
  9. Cadbury, Sir A.: 1992, Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (London: Gee Publishing).Google Scholar
  10. Caswell, J.A.: 1984, “An Institutional Perspective on Corporate Control and the Network of Interlocking Directorates”, Journal of Economic Issues XVIII(2): 619–626.Google Scholar
  11. Clarke, T.: 1993, “Corporate Governance after Cadbury”, Executive Development 6(3): 28–32.Google Scholar
  12. Cooke, P.: 1998, “Enterprise Support in Dynamic European Regions”, in Sustaining Competitive Advantage (Dublin: National Economic and Social Council).Google Scholar
  13. Coulson-Thomas, C.: 1990, “Developing Directors”, European Management Journal 8(4): 488–499.Google Scholar
  14. Coulson-Thomas, C. and A. Wakelam: 1991, The Effective Board: Current Practice, Myths and Realities (London: Institute of Directors).Google Scholar
  15. Cowen, S.S. and R.L. Osborne: 1993, “Board of Directors as Strategy”, Journal of General Management 19(2): 1–13.Google Scholar
  16. Dalton, D.R., C.M. Daily, A.E. Ellstrand and J.L. Johnson: 1998, “Meta-analytic Review of Board Composition, Leadership Structure and Financial Performance”, Strategic Management Journal 10(3): 269–290.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, G.F.: 1993, “Who Gets Ahead in the Market for Corporate Directors: The Political Economy of Multiple Board Memberships”, Academy of Management Best Papers Proc: 202–206.Google Scholar
  18. Dun & Bradstreet: 1992, Marketing Guide to Ireland 1991/92 (Dublin: Dun & Bradstreet).Google Scholar
  19. Faulkner, D.: 1995, International Strategic Alliances: Co-operating to Compete (London: McGraw Hill).Google Scholar
  20. Ghoshal, S. and C.A. Bartlett: 1997, The Individualised Corporation: A Fundamentally New Approach to Management (New York: Harper Business).Google Scholar
  21. Greenbury, Sir R.: 1995, Directors' Remuneration: Report of a Study Group Chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury (London: Gee & Co.).Google Scholar
  22. Gulati, R.: 1998, “Alliances and Networks”, Strategic Management Journal 19(4): 293–317.Google Scholar
  23. Hallock, K.F.: 1997, “Reciprocally Interlocking Boards of Directors and Executive Compensation”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 32(3): 331–344.Google Scholar
  24. Hampel, R.: 1998, Committee on Corporate Governance Final Report (London: Gee & Co.).Google Scholar
  25. Hilferding, R.: 1981, Finance Capital (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul) (originally published in German in 1910).Google Scholar
  26. Howe, E. and S. McRae: 1991, Women on the Board (United Kingdom: Policy Studies Institute).Google Scholar
  27. Ibarra, H.: 1993, “Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework”, Academy of Management Review 18(1): 56–87.Google Scholar
  28. Jarillo, J.C.: 1993, Strategic Networks: Creating the Borderless Organisation (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann).Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy, C.: 1993, “Adding Value to the Board” Director (UK) 47(3): 36–40.Google Scholar
  30. Kenny, I.: 1991, “Boardroom Practice”, Management Decision 29(7): 15–17.Google Scholar
  31. Knoke, D. and J.H. Kuklinski: 1982, Network Analysis (Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications).Google Scholar
  32. Krackhardt, D. and J.R. Hanson: 1993, “Informal Networks: The Company Behind the Chart”, Harvard Business Review July–August: 104–111.Google Scholar
  33. Leighton, D.S.R. and D.H. Thain: 1993, “Selecting New Directors”, Business Quarterly Summer: 17–25.Google Scholar
  34. Lorange, P. and J. Roos: 1993, Strategic Alliances: Formation, Implementation, Evolution (Oxford: Blackwell Business).Google Scholar
  35. Mac Canna, L.: 1994, Networks of Corporate Power (Dublin: University College Dublin MBA thesis).Google Scholar
  36. MacCormac, M.: 1985, “The Functions of the Board of Directors: A Reassessment”, Journal of Irish Business and Administrative Research 7(1): 90–97.Google Scholar
  37. Miles, R.E., C.C. Snow and H. Coleman: 1992, “Managing 21st Century Network Organisations”, Organizational Dynamics 20(3): 5–20.Google Scholar
  38. Mintz, B. and M. Schwartz: 1981, “Interlocking Directorates and Interest Group Formation”, American Sociological Review 46 (December): 851–869.Google Scholar
  39. Mizruchi, M.S.: 1996, “What do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorships”, Annual Review of Sociology 22: 271–298.Google Scholar
  40. Mizruchi, M.S. and L.B. Stearns: 1988, “A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates”, Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 194–210.Google Scholar
  41. Norhria, N. and R.G. Eccles (eds.): 1992, Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).Google Scholar
  42. O'Higgins, E.: 1992, Non-Executive Directors in the Irish Boardroom: Selection and Characteristics (Dublin: Network).Google Scholar
  43. O'Neill, J.D.: 1995, The Irish Stock Market Annual (Dublin: Private Research Limited).Google Scholar
  44. Ornstein, M.: 1984, “Interlocking Directorates in Canada: Intercorporate or Class Alliance?”, Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 210–231.Google Scholar
  45. Pettigrew, A.M.: 1992, “On Studying Managerial Elites”, Strategic Management Journal 13: 163–182.Google Scholar
  46. Porter, M.E.: 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  47. Scott, J.: 1985, “Theoretical Framework and Research Design”, in F.N. Stokman, R. Ziegler and J. Scott (eds.), Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries (Cambridge U.K.: Polity Press), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  48. Scott, J.P. and C. Griff: 1984, Directors of Industry. The British Corporate Network 1904 to 1976 (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  49. Stokman, F.N. and F.W. Wasseur: 1985, “National Networks in 1976: A Structural Comparison” in F.N. Stokman, R. Ziegler and J. Scott (eds.), Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press), pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
  50. Stokman, F.N., R. Ziegler and J. Scott: 1985, Networks of Corporate Power: A Comparative Analysis of Ten Countries (Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  51. Wageman, R: 1997, “Critical Success Factors for Creating Superb Self-Managing Teams”, Organizational Dynamics 26(1): 49–61.Google Scholar
  52. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust: 1994, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  53. Westphal, J.D. and E.J. Zajac: 1997, “Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity and the Diffusion of Board Independence in US Corporations”, Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 161–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leo Mac Canna
    • 1
  • Niamh Brennan
    • 2
  • Eleanor O'Higgins
    • 2
  1. 1.The Computer Department LimitedIreland
  2. 2.Department of Accountancy and Department of Business AdministrationUniversity College DublinIreland

Personalised recommendations