Mangroves and Salt Marshes

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 207–213 | Cite as

Riley encased methodology: principles and processes of mangrove habitat creation and restoration

  • Robert W. Riley
  • Chandra P. Salgado Kent
Article

Abstract

Riley encased methodology (REM) was developed for the purpose of establishing mangroves along high‐energy shorelines, revetments, and bulkheads where natural recruitment no longer occurs and where conventional planting methods are ineffective. The principles of REM include the processes of individual seedling isolation within tubular encasements and adaptation of the juvenile plant to the external environment of the restoration site. The success of REM results from specifications for encasement preparation, propagule or seedling selection, and positioning of both encasements and seedlings according to elevation and tidal regimes.

ecosystems Florida mangal reforestation Rhizophora wetlands 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, R. M. and Crewz, D. 1990. An introduction to planting and maintaining selected common coastal plants in Florida pp. 1–108. In: SGR-97. The Florida Sea Grant College Program. Florida Cooperative Extension Service. Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Cusson, M. and Bourget, E. 1997. Influence of topographic heterogeneity and spatial scales on the structure of the neighboring intertidal endobenthic macrofaunal community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 150: 181–193.Google Scholar
  3. Field, C. 1998. Rationales and practices of mangrove afforestation. Marine Freshwater Resources 49: 353–358.Google Scholar
  4. Goforth, H.W. and Thomas, J.R. 1980. Planting of red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle-L.) for stabilization of marl shorelines in the Florida Keys. pp. 207–230. In: Cole, D.P. (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Wetlands Restoration and Creation. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  5. Hannan, J. 1975. Aspects of red mangrove reforestation in Florida. pp. 112–121. In: R.R. Lewis (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on restoration of coastal vegetation in Florida. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Hemminga, M.A., Slim, F.J., Kazungu, J., Ganssen, G.M., Nieuwenhuize, J. and Kruyt, N.M. 1994. Carbon outwelling from a mangrove forest with adjacent seagrass beds and coral reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 106: 291–301.Google Scholar
  7. Kogo, M., Kamimura, D. and Miyagi, T. 1987. Research for rehabilitation/ reforestation of mangroves in Truk islands. pp. 419–439. In: UNDP/UNESCO Regional Mangrove Project RAA/79/002 Mangroves of Asia and the Pacific: Status and Management.Google Scholar
  8. Laegdsgaard, P. and Johnson, C.R. 1995. Mangrove habitats as nurseries: unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 126: 67–81.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, R.R. 1990. Creation and restoration of coastal plain wetlands in Florida. pp. 73–101. In: Kusler, J.A. and Kentula, M.E. (eds), Wetland Creation and Restoration, The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  10. Lin, J. and Beal, J.L. 1995. Effects of mangrove marsh management on fish and decapod communities. Bulletin of Marine Science 57(1): 193–201.Google Scholar
  11. Mazda, Y., Magi, M., Kogo, M. and Hong, P.N. 1997. Mangroves as a coastal protection from waves in the Tong King delta, Vietnam. Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1: 127–135.Google Scholar
  12. NOAA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service. 1987. Tidal Bench Marks, Sebastian Inlet, Indian River, Latitude 27°51.6′N, Longitude 80°26.9°W. NOAA Chart 11476.Google Scholar
  13. Odum, W.E. and Heald, E.J. 1975. The detritus-based food web of an estuarine mangrove community. pp 265–286. In: Cronin, L.E. (ed.), Estuarine Research. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Riley, R.W., Jr. 1995. A red mangrove replenishment methodology. pp. 132–161. In: Webb, F.J. and Cannizzaro, P.J. (eds), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Ecosystems and Creation. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  15. Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. 1992. Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  16. Robertson, A.I. and Duke, N.C. 1987. Mangroves as nursery sites: comparisons of the abundance and species composition of fish and crustaceans in mangroves and other nearshore habitats in tropical Australia. Marine Biology 96: 193–205.Google Scholar
  17. Scoffin, T.P. 1970. The trapping and binding of subtidal carbonate sediments by marine vegetation in Bimini Lagoon, Bahamas. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 40(1): 249–273.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, D.C. 1982, Shore erosion control demonstrations in Florida. pp. 87–89. In: Stovall, R.H. (ed.), Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference on Wetlands Restoration and Creation. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, S.M. and Snedaker, S.C. 1995. Developmental responses of established red mangrove, Rhizophora mangle L., seedlings to relative levels of photosynthetically active and ultraviolet radiation. Florida Scientists 58(1): 55–60.Google Scholar
  20. Stevely, J. and Rabinowitz, L. 1982. Mangroves – A Guide for Planting and Maintenance. Florida Cooperative Extension, Marine Advisory Bulletin.Google Scholar
  21. Teas, H.J. 1977. Ecology and restoration of mangrove shorelines in Florida. Environmental Conservation 4(1): 51–58.Google Scholar
  22. Teas, H.J., Jurgens, W. and Kimball, M.C. 1975. Plantings of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) in Charlotte and St. Lucie Counties, Florida. pp. 132–161. In: Lewis, R.R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida. Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida. Tampa Audubon Society and Florida Audubon Society, Florida.Google Scholar
  23. Thayer, G.W., Colby, D.R. and Hettler, W.F. 1987. Utilization of the red mangrove prop root habitat by fishes in South Florida. Marine Ecology Progress Series 35: 25–38.Google Scholar
  24. Tomlinson, P.B. 1986. The Botany of Mangroves. Harvard University Petersham, Massachusetts. Harvard Forest.Google Scholar
  25. Wolanski, E., Mazda, Y. and Ridd, P. 1992. Mangrove hydrodynamics. pp. 43–62. In: Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. (eds), Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Woodroffe, C.D.B., Ward, P.J. and Hanley, J.R. 1988. Production of mangrove litter in a macrotidal embayment, Darwin Harbour, N.T., Australia. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 26: 581–598.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert W. Riley
    • 1
  • Chandra P. Salgado Kent
    • 2
  1. 1.Mangrove Replenishment InitiativeMelbourne BeachUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesFloridaInstitute of TechnologyMelbourneUSA

Personalised recommendations