Waste Gas Monitor Reduces Wasted Volatile Anesthetic

  • Tammy Y. Euliano
  • Johannes H. van Oostrom
  • Jan van der Aa


Objective. The increasing focus on health care costs requires that all physicians evaluate practice behaviors. The primary emphasis in anesthesia has been limiting the use of expensive medications and interventions. Reducing waste is another approach, and volatile anesthetics are an appropriate target in that simple reduction of fresh gas flow (FGF) rates is effective. A monitor that measures and displays the cost of wasted volatile anesthetic was developed and used to determine if real-time display of the cost would result in decreased FGF rates, which, in turn, would decrease wasted anesthetic. Methods. The waste gas monitor (WGM) measures flow rate at the anesthesia machine's scavenger port, integrates this with agent concentration, and displays the calculated cost, real-time, on a portable computer screen. The WGM equipment was attached to the anesthesia machine in the gynecologic surgery operating room (OR) and those cases performed under general endotracheal anesthesia and lasting longer than one hour were eligible for inclusion. First year anesthesiology residents assigned to the study OR as part of a non-specialty rotation, were the subjects of the study. For each resident, after data were collected from at least two eligible baseline cases (Baseline Phase, WGM not visible and resident unaware of its presence), the monitor was introduced and data collection continued for at least three more eligible cases (Visible Phase). Results. Nine residents were initially enrolled, but due to scheduling difficulties only five residents completed the protocol. Data from cases using the WGM demonstrated a 50% decrease (3.58 ± 1.34 l/min vs. 1.78 ± 0.51 l/min (p = 0.009)) in the scavenger flow rates, which resulted in a 48% ($5.28 ± 0.68 vs. $2.72 ± 0.80 (p = 0.002)) decrease in hourly cost of wasted volatile anesthetic. There was no difference between the Baseline and Visible phases with regard to use of nitrous oxide or intravenous anesthetic agents. Conclusions. The WGM decreased wasted volatile anesthetic by encouraging decreased FGF rates.

Anesthesia: volatile anesthetics Anesthesia: waste Anesthesia: cost Anesthesia: monitor Anesthesia: fresh gas flow rate Education: anesthesiology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bootman JL, Larson LN, McGhan WF, Townsend RJ. Pharmacoeconomic research and clinical trials: Concepts and issues. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1989; 23: 693–697Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Virtue RW. Comparison of cost of high and low flows of anaesthetic agents, letter. Can Anaesth Soc J 1981; 28: 182–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cravero JP, Suida E, Manzi D, Rice LF. Survey of low flow anesthesia use in the United States, abstract. J Clin Monit Comput 1997; 13: 421Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnstone RE, Jozefczyk KG. Costs of anesthetic drugs: Experiences with a cost education trial. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 766–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horrow JC, Rosenberg H. Price stickers do not alter drug usage. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 1047–1052PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lomas J, Haynes RB. A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: From``official'' to ``individual'' clinical policy. AmJ Prev Med 1988; 4 (Suppl): 77–94Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halsey MJ. Potency, physical properties and molecular mechanisms of inhalational anaesthetics. In: Prys-Roberts C, Brown BR Jr, eds. International Practice of Anaesthe-sia. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1996: 1/10/6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Becker KE, Carrithers J. Practical methods of cost con-tainment in anesthesia and surgery. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 388–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hawkes C, Miller D, Martineau R, Hull K, Hopkins H, Tierney M. Evaluation of cost minimization strategies of anaesthetic drugs in a tertiary care hospital. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41: 894–901PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Szocik JF, Learned DW. Impact of a cost containment program on the use of volatile anesthetics and neuro-muscular blocking drugs. J Clin Anesth 1994; 6: 378–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lubarsky DA, Glass PS, Ginsberg B, et al. The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines. Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings. SWiPE group. Systematic withdrawal of perioperative expenses. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 1145–1160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Greco PJ, Eisenberg JM. Changing physicians' practices. N Engl JMed 1993; 329: 1271–1274Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Soumerai SB, Avorn J. Principles of educational outreach ("academic detailing'') to improve clinical decision making. JAMA1990; 263: 549–556PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cohen MM, Rose DK, Yee DA. Changing anesthesiolo-gists' practice patterns: Can it be done? Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 260–269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Delayed feedback of physician performance versus immediate reminders to perform preventive care: E¡ects on physician compliance. Med Care 1986; 24: 659–666PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McPhee SJ, Bird JA, Jenkins CN, Fordham D. Promot-ing cancer screening: A randomized, controlled trial of three interventions. Arch Intern Med 1989; 149: 1866–1872PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Eisenberg JM. An educational program to modify labo-ratory use by house sta¡. JMed Educ 1977; 52: 578–581Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bengtson JP, Bengtson A, Stenqvist O. The circle system as a humidi¢er. Br J Anaesth 1989; 63: 453–457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sherman SJ, Cullen BF. Nitrous oxide and the green-house e¡ect (Letter). Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 816–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Waterson CK. Recovery of waste anesthetic gases. In: Brown BR Jr, ed., Future Anesthesia Delivery Systems. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1984: 115–118Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Revell SP, Tayler DH. Isoflurane in a circle system with lowgas flow. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 1219–1222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cotter SM, Petros AJ, Dore CJ, Barber ND, White DC. Low-flow anaesthesia: Practice, cost implications and acceptability. Anaesthesia 1991; 46: 1009–1012PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pedersen FM, Nielsen J, Ibsen M, Guldager H. Low-flow isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia o¡ers substantial economic advantages over high-and medium-flow iso-flurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1993; 37: 509–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matjasko J. Economic impact of low-flow anesthesia (Letter). Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 863–864PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tammy Y. Euliano
    • 1
  • Johannes H. van Oostrom
    • 1
  • Jan van der Aa
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleU.S.A
  2. 2.Shands Hospital at the University of FloridaGainesvilleU.S.A

Personalised recommendations