Mangroves and Salt Marshes

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 103–111

Effects of tidal inundation and predation on Avicennia germinans seedling establishment and survival in a sub-tropical mangal/salt marsh community

  • Stuart Patterson
  • Karen L. McKee
  • Irving A. Mendelssohn
Article

Abstract

The black mangrove, Avicennia germinans, occurs sympatric withSpartina alterniflora in coastal Louisiana. Zonation exists alongan elevational gradient with A. germinans dominant at higherelevation creekbanks and S. alterniflora at interior, lowerelevation sites with greater depth and duration of flooding.Establishment of A. germinans seedlings was examined in cagesthat excluded predators and limited horizontal, but not vertical,movement of propagules by the tides and showed that blackmangrove could readily establish in the Spartina zone. Survivalof A. germinans seedlings after one year in cages was notsignificantly different between the two zones, and seedlings weresignificantly taller in the Spartina zone. Thus, neitherinundation per se nor other abiotic factors alone could accountfor the absence of A. germinans in the interior marsh. Althoughpropagules were dispersed into both zones, a net removal ofuncaged propagules from plots in the Spartina zone (–1.3 ± 0.6m-2 d-1) compared to a net addition to plots in the Avicennia zone (+0.5 ± 0.4 m-2d-1) indicated that retention of propagulesdiffered between zones. Causes of mortality were decay (Spartina> Avicennia zone), desiccation (Avicennia > Spartina zone), andpredation (Spartina > Avicennia zone). Although few propaguleswere completely consumed by predators (snails and crabs), damageto the cotyledons promoted decay. The results suggest that tidalaction limits retention and settlement of A. germinans propagulesin the Spartina zone, and a combination of predator damage andfrequent flooding leads to rapid decay of propagules that strandthere.

dispersal ecotone intertidal zone mangrove propagule wetland 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Clarke, L.D. and Allaway, W.G. 1993. The regeneration niche of the grey mangrove (Avicennia marina): effects of salinity, light and sediment factors on establishment, growth, and survival in the field. Oecologia 93: 548–556.Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, L.D. and Hannon, N.J. 1967. The mangrove swamp and salt marsh communities of the Sydney District I. Vegetation, soils and climate. Journal of Ecology 55: 753–771.Google Scholar
  4. Clarke, P.J. and Myerscough, P.J. 1993. The intertidal distribution of the grey mangrove (Avicennia marina) in southeastern Australia: The effects of physical conditions, interspecific competition, and predation on propagule establishment and survival. Australian Journal of Ecology 18: 307–315.Google Scholar
  5. Detweiler, T., Dunstan, F.M., Lewis III, R.R. and Fehring, W.K. 1975. Patterns of secondary succession in a mangrove community, Tampa Bay, Florida. pp. 52–81. In: Walsh, G. et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida, 203 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Eleuterius, L.N. and Eleuterius, C.K. 1979. Tide levels and salt marsh zonation. Bulletin of Marine Science 29: 94–400.Google Scholar
  7. Gosselink, J.G. and Kirby, C.J. 1974. Decomposition of salt marsh grass, Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Limnology and Oceanography 19: 825–832.Google Scholar
  8. Jimenez, J.A. and Sauter, K. 1991. Structure and dynamics of mangrove forests along a flooding gradient. Estuaries 14: 49–56.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, S.A., Jr. 1983. Preliminary report on Avicennia germinans located on Isle de Chien (Dog Island), Franklin County, Florida. Tropical Ecology 24: 13–18.Google Scholar
  10. Kangas, P.C. and Lugo, A.E. 1990. The distribution of mangroves and saltmarsh in Florida. Tropical Ecology 31: 32–39.Google Scholar
  11. Lopez-Portillo, J. and Ezcurra, E. 1989. Zonation in mangrove and salt marsh vegetation at Laguna de Micoacan, Mexico. Biotropica 21: 107–114.Google Scholar
  12. Lugo, A.E. and Zucca, C.P. 1977. The impact of low temperature stress on mangrove structure and growth. Tropical Ecology 18: 149–161.Google Scholar
  13. McKee, K. L. 1993. Soil physicochemical patterns and mangrove species distribution: reciprocal effects? J. Ecol. 81: 477–487.Google Scholar
  14. McKee, K. L. 1995a. Seedling recruitment patterns in a Belizean mangrove forest: effects of establishment ability and physico-chemical factors. Oecologia 101: 448–460.Google Scholar
  15. McKee, K. L. 1995b. Mangrove species distribution patterns and propagule predation in Belize: an exception to the dominance-predation hypothesis. Biotropica 27: 334–345.Google Scholar
  16. McMillan, C. 1971. Environmental factors affecting seedling establishment of the black mangrove on the central Texas coast. Ecology 52: 927–930.Google Scholar
  17. Osborne, K. and Smith, T.J., III. 1990. Differential predation on mangrove propagules in open and closed canopy forest habitats. Vegetatio 89: 1–6.Google Scholar
  18. Patterson, C.S. 1991. Factors controlling the distribution of the black mangrove, Avicennia germinans L., in a Louisiana mangal/salt marsh community. Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Patterson, C.S. and Mendelssohn, I.A. 1991. A comparison of physicochemical variables across plant zones in a mangal/salt marsh community in Louisiana. Wetlands 11: 139–161.Google Scholar
  20. Patterson, C.S., Mendelssohn, I.A. and Swenson, E.M. 1993. Growth and survival of Avicennia germinans seedlings in a mangal/salt marsh community in Louisiana, U.S.A. Journal of Coastal Research 9: 801–810.Google Scholar
  21. Rabinowitz, D. 1978a. Dispersal properties of mangrove propagules. Biotropica 10: 47–57.Google Scholar
  22. Rabinowitz, D. 1978b. Early growth of mangrove seedlings in Panama, and an hypothesis concerning the relationship of dispersal and zonation. Journal of Biogeography 5: 113–133.Google Scholar
  23. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 1985 Version 5 Edition, SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
  24. Sherrod, C.L., Hockaday, D.L. and McMillan, C. 1986. Survival of red mangrove, Rhizophora mangle, on the Gulf of Mexico coast of Texas. Contributions in Marine Science 29: 27–36.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, T. J. III. 1987a. Seed predation in relation to tree dominance and distribution in mangrove forests. Ecology 68: 266–273.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, T. J. III. 1987b. Effects of seed predators and light level on the distribution of Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. in tropical, tidal forests. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 25: 43–51.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, T. J. III. 1992. Forest structure. pp. 101–136. In: A.I. Robertson and Alongi, D.M. (eds), Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems. Coastal and Estuarine Studies #41. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Smith, T. J., III, Chan, H.T., McIvor, C.C. and Roblee, M.B. 1989. Comparisons of seed predation in tropical, tidal forests from three continents. Ecology 70: 146–151.Google Scholar
  29. Tomlinson, P. B. 1986. The Botany of Mangroves. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. West, R.C. 1977. Tidal salt-marsh and mangal formations of Middle and South America. pp. 157–166. In: Chapman, V.J. (ed.), Ecosystems of the World, 1. Wet Coastal Ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Patterson
    • 1
  • Karen L. McKee
    • 1
  • Irving A. Mendelssohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Wetland Biogeochemistry Institute, Center for Coastal, Energy and Environmental ResourcesLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeU.S.A

Personalised recommendations