A Cross-Validated Multifactorial Index of Perioperative Risks in Adults Undergoing Anaesthesia for Non-Cardiac Surgery

  • Bernhard Schwilk
  • Rainer Muche
  • Hans Treiber
  • Alexander Brinkmann
  • Michael Georgieff
  • Ulrich Bothner
Article

Abstract

Objective. To develop a severity index of anaesthetic risk that predicts relevant perioperative adverse events in adults. Design. Prospective cross-sectional study. Setting. Department of anaesthesiology at one university hospital. Patients. 26907 consecutive anaesthetic procedures in patients over 15 years of age and a complete preoperative evaluation. Patients undergoing cardiac and obstetric surgery were excluded. Measurements and main results. Demographic data, preoperative health status, type of anaesthesia, operative procedures, and perioperative incidents (standardised on a national basis) were acquired by means of a computerised anaesthetic record system. Occurrence of at least one perioperative event with impact on postanaesthetic care was computed by a multivariate logistic regression model against 17 variables with different characteristics representing possible risk factors. Fourteen variables proved to be independent risk factors. The weighting of the variables was expressed in scores which added up to form a simple index for each patient. Patients without major risk factors (0–10 points) had a 0.3% risk of suffering from a relevant incident. Patients with more than 60 points had a 28.6% risk. The results were well demonstrated by cross-validation. Conclusions. The index seems to reflect the risk of relevant perioperative incidents. It can be used for audit purposes. In daily routine, the index could focus our attention on patients with increased perioperative risk. However, it is limited in detecting particular constellations of factors which interact on each other with regard to perioperative risk.

Anaesthesia epidemiology perioperative events risk factors complications 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: A prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J 1985; 32: 429–434Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, Southwick FS, Krogstad D, Murray B, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med 1977; 845–850Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olsson GL. Bronchospasm during anaesthesia. A computer-aided incidence study of 136 929 patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1987; 31: 244–252Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Agarwal N. Shibutani K, SanFilippo JA, Del Guercio LRM. Hemodynamic and respiratory changes in surgery of the morbidly obese. Surgery 1982; 92: 226–234Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwilk B, Muche R, Bothner U, Brinkmann A, Bartels F, Goergieff M. Zwischenfälle, Ereignisse und Komplikationen in der perioperativen Phase bei normal-und fehlernährten Patienten. Ergebnisse von 23 056 Anästhesien. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1995; 30: 99–107Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forrest JB, Rehder K, Cahalan MK, Goldsmith CH. Multicenter study of general anesthesia. III. Predictors of severe perioperative adverse outcomes. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 3–15Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arvidsson S, Outchterlony J, Nisson S, Sjöstedt L, Svärdsudd K. The Gothenburg study of perioperative risk. I. Preoperative findings, postoperative complications. Acta Anaestesiol Scand 1994; 38: 679–690Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Derrington MC, Smith G: A review of studies of anaesthetic risk, morbidity and mortality. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 815–833Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Pope WDB, Wolkenstein C. A survey of 112,000 anaesthetics at one teaching hospital. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 33: 22–31Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Tate RB. Does anestesia contribute to operative mortality? J Am Med Ass 1988; 260: 2859–2863Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Pope WDB, Biehl D, Tweed WA, MacWilliam L, et al. The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: II. Can outcomes be used to assess the quality of anaestesia care? Can J Anaesth 1992; 39: 430–439Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang LP, Hägerdal M. Reported anaesthetic complications during an 11-year period. A retrospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1992; 36: 234–240Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tiret L, Desmonts JM, Hatton F, Vourc'h G. Complications associated with anaesthesia–a prospective survey in France. Can Anaesth Soc J 1986; 336–344Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cooper JB, Cullen DJ, Nemeskal R, Hoaglin DC, Gevirtz CC, Csete M, et al. Effects of information feedback and pulse oximetry on the incidence of anesthesia complications. Anesthesiology 1987; 67: 686–694Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen MM, Duncan PG, Tweed WA, Biehl D, Pope WDB, Perry M, et al. The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: I. Description of methods and populations. Can J Anaesth 1992, 39: 420–429Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farrow SC, Fowkes FGR, Lunn JN, Robertson IB, Samuel P. Epidemiology in anaesthesia. II. Factors affecting mortality in hospital. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 811–816Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holland R. Anaesthetic Mortality in New South Wales. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 834–841Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästesiologie und Intensivmedizin. Maßnahmen zur Qualitätssicherung von Anästhesieverfahren. Anästh Intensivmed 1992; 33: 78–83Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schwilk B, Muche R, Bothner U, Goertz A, Friesdorf W, Georgieff M. Prozeßqualität in der Anästhesiologie. Ergbebnisse einer prospektiven Erhebung nach den Empfehlungen der DGAI. Anaesthesist 1995; 44: 242–249Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwilk B, Friess L, Friesdorf W, Ahnefeld FW, Georgieff M. Präoperative Risikofaktoren und intra-und postoperative Risikoverwirklichung bei 11 890 Anästhesien. Erste Ergebnisse einer prospektiven Studie. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 1993; 28: 484–492Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S. Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. J Am Med Assoc 1993; 270: 2957–2963Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higgins TL, Estafanous FG, Loop FD, Beck GJ, Blum JM, Paranandi L. Stratifaction of morbidity and mortality outcome by preoperative risk factors in coronary artery bypass patients. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 267: 2344–2348Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwilk B, Hähnel J, Friess L, Blessing S, Friesdorf W. Ergebnisse zur Verfahrensentwicklung und zum personellen Aufwand im Zusammenhang mit der Einführung qualitätssichernder Maßnahmen. Anästh Intensivmed 1994; 35: 349–356Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Urban D. Logit-Analyse. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer, 1993Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muche R. Variablenselektion in Kohortenstudien. [dissertation]. Ulm (D): Univ of Ulm, 1995Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kersting Th. Qualitätssicherung und Qualitätskontrolle in der Anästhesie. Anästh Intensivmed 1991; 32: 308–314Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmidt K, Ladleif HU, Hommerich P, Harke H. Qualitätssicherung: Klinikprofile im Vergleich. Ergebnisse der Krefelder Studie. Anästh Intensivmed 1991; 32: 315–319Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tsekos E, Leier M, Boeden G, Blinzler L, Jagschies I, Heuser D. Qualitätssicherung in der Anästhesie – zwischen Akzeptanz und Realisierung. Anästh Intensivmed 1993; 34: 325–329Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pedersen T, Eliasen K, Henriksen E. A prospective study of risk factors and cardiopulmonary complications associated with anaesthesia and surgery: risk indicators of cardiopulmonary morbidity. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990; 34: 144–155Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jayasuriya JP, Anandaciva S. Compliance with an incident report scheme in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1995; 50: 846–849Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Forrest JB, Rehder K, Cahalan MK, Goldsmith CH, Levy WJ, Strunin L, et al. Multicenter study of general anesthesia. II. Results. Anesthesiology 1990; 72: 262–268Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ouchterlony J, Arvidsson S, Sjöstedt L, Svärdsudd K. Peroperative and immediate postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing elective general and orthopedic surgery. The Gothenburg study of perioperative risk (PROPER). Part II. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 643–652Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cooper JB, Newbower RS, Kitz RJ. An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection. Anesthesiology 1984; 60: 34–42Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bittenbinder TM, McLeskey CH. Geriatric anesthesiology. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 1994; 7: 481–486Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fowkes FGR, Lunn JN, Farrow SC, Robertson IB, Samuel P. Epidemiology in anaesthesia. III. Mortality risk in patients with coexisting physical disease. Br J Anaesth 1982; 54: 819–825Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vaughan RW, Vaughan MS, Hagaman RM, Cork RC. Predicting adverse outcomes during anesthesia and surgery by prospective risk assessment. [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1983; 59: A132Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Alon E. Intubationsprobleme in der geburtshilflichen Anästhesie. In: Biro P, Pasch T, editors. Die schwierige Intubation. Bern Göttingen Toronto Seattle: Huber, 1995: 24–29Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Georgieff M, Schirmer U. Klinische Anästhesiologie. Berlin/Heidelberg/NewYork: Springer, 1995: 285–288Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wickstöm I, Holmberg I, Stefansson T. Survival of female geriatric patients after hip fracture surgery. A comparison of 5 anesthetic methods. Acta Anaesth Scand 1982; 26: 607–614Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    McGowan SW, Smith GFN. Anaesthesia for transurethral prostatectomy. A comparison of spinal intradural analgesia with two methods of general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1980, 35: 847–853Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Palmer SK, Gibbs CP. Risk management in obstetric anesthesia. Int Anesthesiol Clin 1989; 27: 188–199Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Samsoon GLT, Young JRB. Difficult tracheal intubatin: A retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487–490Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Unertl K, Wroblewski H, Glükher S, Henrich G, Rauch M, Peter K. Das Risiko in der Anästhesie. Münch med Wschr 1985; 127: 609–612Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Osswald PM, Hartung HJ, Feldmann U. Prognostische Aussagekraft einer präoperativen Risikocheckliste. Anaesthesist 1985; 34: 508–512Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lee AC, Gabel RA. Audit of anesthesia performance. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 1994; 7: 473–476Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Harke H, Schmidt K, Gretenkort P, Hommerich P, Deutschmann S, Eckes C et al. Qualitaetsvergleich von modifizierter Neurolept-, balancierter und intravenoeser Anaesthesie.Teil 2. Anaesthesist 1995; 44: 687–694Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Lagasse RS, Steinberg ES, Katz RI, Saubermann AJ. Defining quality of care by statistical process control of adverse outcomes. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1181–1188Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Banks IC, Tackley RM. A standard set of terms for critical incident reporting? Br J Anaesth 1994; 73: 703–708Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernhard Schwilk
    • 1
  • Rainer Muche
    • 2
  • Hans Treiber
    • 1
  • Alexander Brinkmann
    • 1
  • Michael Georgieff
    • 1
  • Ulrich Bothner
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnaesthesiologyUniversity of UlmGermany
  2. 2.Department of Clinical Documentation and StatisticsUniversity of UlmGermany
  3. 3.Department of Medical InformaticsUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations