Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 337–363

Public Opinion and Political Philosophy: The Relation between Social-Scientific and Philosophical Analyses of Distributive Justice

  • Adam Swift
Article

Abstract

This paper considers the relation between philosophical discussions of, and social-scientific research into popular beliefs about, distributive justice. The first part sets out the differences and tensions between the two perspectives, identifying considerations which tend to lead adherents of each discipline to regard the other as irrelevant to its concerns. The second discusses four reasons why social scientists might benefit from philosophy: problems in identifying inconsistency, the fact that non-justice considerations might underlie distributive judgments, the way in which different principles of justice can yield the same concrete distributive judgments, and the ambiguity of key terms. The third part distinguishes and evaluates three versions of the claim that normative theorising about justice can profit from empirical research into public opinion: that its findings are food for thought, that they amount to feasibility constraints, and that they are constitutive of normatively justified principles of justice. The view that popular opinion about justice has a strongly constitutive role to play in justifying principles of distributive justice stricto sensu is rejected, but it is argued that what the people think (and what they can reasonably be expected to come to think) on distributive matters can be an important factor for the political theorist to take into account, for reasons of legitimacy, or feasibility, or both.

desert distributive justice public opinion John Rawls social justice Michael Walzer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bell, J. and E. Schokkaert, Interdisciplinary theory and research on justice, in K. R. Scherer (ed.) Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 237–253.Google Scholar
  2. Burgoyne, C., A. Swift, and G. Marshall, Inconsistency in Beliefs about Distributive Justice: A Cautionary Note, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 23, (1993),pp. 327–342.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, T., Humanity before Justice, British Journal of Political Science 4, (1974),pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, J., Political Obligation in its Historical Context, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  5. Elster, J., Local Justice, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Elster, J., The Empirical Study of Justice, in D. Miller and M. Walzer (eds.) Justice,Pluralism and Equality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
  7. Estlund, D., The Persistent Puzzle of the Minority Democrat, American Philosophical Quarterly 26, (1989), pp. 143–151.Google Scholar
  8. Estlund, D., The Survival of Egalitarian Justice in John Rawls's Political Liberalism, Journal of Political Philosophy 4, (1996), pp. 68–78.Google Scholar
  9. Fishkin, J., The Voice of the People: Public opinion and Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. Frolich, N. and J.A. Oppenheimer, Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  11. Galston, W., Liberal Purposes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. Gaus, G.F., Justificatory Liberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. Goode, W.J., The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Social Control System, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. Greenawalt, K., ”Truth” or Consequences, in I. Shapiro and J. W. DeCew (eds.) Nomos XXXVII Theory and Practice, New York: New York University Press, 1996, pp. 386–399.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, F. and P. Pettit, Moral Functionalism and Moral Motivation, Philosophical Quarterly 45, (1996), pp. 20–40.Google Scholar
  16. Lerner, M.J., The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion, New York: Plenum Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. Miller, D., Review Article: Recent Theories of Social Justice, British Journal of Political Science 21, (1991), pp. 371–391.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, D., Distributive Justice: What the People Think, Ethics 102, (1992), pp. 555–593.Google Scholar
  19. Miller, D., Review of K. Scherer (ed.) Justice: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Social Justice Research 7, (1994), pp. 167–188.Google Scholar
  20. Moore, B., Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt, London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Mulhall, S. and A. Swift, Liberals and Communitarians, (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar
  22. Nozick, R., Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  24. Rawls, J., Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Reis, H.T., The multidimensionality of Justice, in R. Folger (ed.) The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives, New York: Plenum Press, 1984, pp. 25–61.Google Scholar
  26. Rorty, R., The Priority of Democracy to Philosophy, in A. Malachowski (ed.), Reading Rorty, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990, pp. 279–302.Google Scholar
  27. Scheffler, S., Responsibility, Reactive Attitudes, and Liberalism in Philosophy and Politics, Philosophy and Public Affairs 21, (1992), pp. 299–323.Google Scholar
  28. Strawson. P., Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays, London: Methuen, 1974.Google Scholar
  29. Swift, A., G. Marshall, C. Burgoyne, and D. Routh, Distributive Justice: Does It Matter What the People Think?, in J. Kluegel et al (eds.) Social Justice and PoliticalChange: Public Opinion in Capitalist and Post-Communist States, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1995, pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
  30. Tornblom, K., The social psychology of distributive justice, in K. Scherer (ed.) 1992, pp.177–236.Google Scholar
  31. Walzer, M., Philosophy and Democracy, Political Theory 9, (1981), pp. 379–399.Google Scholar
  32. Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice, New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
  33. Warnke, G., Justice and Interpretation, Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar
  34. Weber, M., Politics as a Vocation and Science as a Vocation, in H. H. Gerth and C. W. Mills, (eds), From Max Weber, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1948, pp. 77–156.Google Scholar
  35. Wollheim, R., A Paradox in the Theory of Democracy, in P. Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.) Philosophy, Politics and Society, Second Series, Oxford: Blackwell, 1962, pp.71–87.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Swift
    • 1
  1. 1.Balliol CollegeOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations