Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 75–83

Nitrogen budget for fescue pastures fertilized with broiler litter in Major Land Resource Areas of the southeastern US

  • Samuel B. Marshall
  • Michael D. Mullen
  • Miguel L. Cabrera
  • C. Wesley Wood
  • Lois C. Braun
  • Elizabeth A. Guertal
Article

Abstract

The southeast US produces a tremendous number of broiler chickens (Gallus gallus), which in turn produce massive quantities of litter (manure and bedding materials). In the Southeast, litter is most often disposed of via land application to pastures, however, the ultimate fate of much of the applied nitrogen (N) is not known. We have constructed N budgets for three sites across the southeastern U.S. in an effort to determine how much of the applied N is useful for plant production and how much is left to be absorbed by the environment. Study sites were located in the Coastal Plain (Alabama), Piedmont (Georgia), and Cumberland Plateau (Tennessee) Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA) of the southeastern US. Litter was applied in the Spring of two consecutive years at a rate to supply 70 kg of available N ha−1. The total amount of N applied ranged from 103 to 252 kg N ha−1 depending on site and year. Nitrogen fluxes monitored in this study were broiler litter N, ammonia (NH3) volatilization, denitrification, plant uptake, and leaching. Plant uptake represented the largest flux of applied N, averaging 43% of applied N. Losses due to NH3 volatilization and denitrification combined were only 6% of applied N on average. Loss of N due to NO3-N leaching appeared to be significant only at the Coastal Plain site where NO3-N concentrations in the groundwater peaked at 38 mg N l−1. We believe the majority of excess N shown in these budgets is likely accounted for by leaching losses and soil accumulation. Regardless of these assumptions and low gaseous losses, it is apparent that on average, 57% of applied N is destined for a fate other than plant uptake. The results of this study indicate that land-application of broiler litter at currently recommended rates has the potential for negative impacts on the environment of the southeastern U.S. in the long-term.

ammonia volatilization broiler litter denitrification leaching nitrogen budget plant uptake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams PL, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Nichols DJ, Pote DH & Scott HD (1994) Poultry litter and manure contributions to nitrate leaching through the vadose zone. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 1206–1211Google Scholar
  2. Aulakh M, Doran J & Mosier A (1992) Soil denitrification – significance, measurement, and effects of management. In: Stewart B (ed) Adv Soil Sci, pp 2–57. New York, NY: Springer-VerlagGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchamp EG, Bergström DW & Burton DL (1996) Denitrification and nitrous oxide production in soil fallowed or under alfalfa or grass. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 27: 87–99Google Scholar
  4. Berg P, Klemedtsson L & Rosswall T (1982) Inhibitory effect of low partial pressures of acetylene on nitrification. Soil Biol Biochem 14: 301–303Google Scholar
  5. Brinson S, Cabrera M & Tyson S (1994) Ammonia volatilization from surface-applied, fresh and composted poultry litter. Plant and Soil 167: 213–218Google Scholar
  6. Cabrera ML & Chiang SC (1994) Water content effect on denitrification and ammoniavolatilization in poultry litter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 811–816Google Scholar
  7. Cabrera M, Chiang S, Merka W, Thompson S & Pancorbo O (1993) Nitrogen transformations in surface-applied poultry litter: effect of litter physical characteristics. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57: 1519–1525Google Scholar
  8. Chang C, Cho CM, & Janzen HH (1998) Nitrous oxide emission from long-term manured soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62: 677–682Google Scholar
  9. Chang C & Janzen H (1996) Long-term fate of nitrogen from annual feedlot manure applications. J Environ Qual 25: 785–790Google Scholar
  10. Colbourn P & Dowdell R (1984) Denitrification in field soils. Plant Soil 76: 213–226Google Scholar
  11. Cope JT, Evans CE & Williams HC (1981) Soil-test fertilizer recommendations for Alabama crops. Alabama Agric Exp Stn Circ251Google Scholar
  12. Duxbury JM (1986) Advantages of the acetylene method of measuring denitrification. In: Hauck RD & Weaver RW (eds) Field Measurement of Dinitrogen Fixation and Denitrification, pp 73–91. SSSA special publication No. 18. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  13. Estavillo J, Rodriguez M, Domingo M, Muñoz-Rueda A & Gonzalez-Murua C (1994) Denitrification losses from a natural grassland in the Basque country under organic and inorganic fertilization. Plant Soil 162: 19–29Google Scholar
  14. Hanson PJ & Lindberg SE (1991) Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen compounds: a review of leaf, canopy and non-foliar measurements. Atmos Environ 25A: 1615–1634Google Scholar
  15. Hoveland CS, Evans EM & Mays DA (1970) Cool-season perennial grass species for forage in Alabama. Auburn Univ Agric Exp Stn Bull 397Google Scholar
  16. Keeney DR (1986) Critique of the acetylene blockage technique for field measurement of denitrification. In: Hauck RD & Weaver RW (eds) FieldMeasurement of Dinitrogen Fixation and Denitrification, pp 103–115. SSSA special publication No. 18. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  17. Kingery W, Wood C, Delaney D, Williams J, Mullins G & van Santen E (1993) Implications of long-term land application of poultry litter on tall fescue pastures. J Prod Agri 6: 390–395Google Scholar
  18. Kirchmann H (1985) Losses, plant uptake and utilisation of manure nitrogen during a production cycle. Acta Agri Scandi Suppl 24Google Scholar
  19. Kirchmann H (1990) Nitrogen interactions and crop uptake from fresh and composted 15N-labelled poultry manure. J Soil Sci 41: 379–385Google Scholar
  20. Lessard R, Rochette P, Gregorich EG, Pattey E & Desjardins RL (1996) Nitrous oxide fluxes from manure-amended soil under maize. J Environ Qual 25: 1371–1377Google Scholar
  21. Liebhardt WC, Golt C & Tupin J (1979) Nitrate and ammonium concentrations of ground water resulting from poultry litter manure applications. J Environ Qual 8: 211–215Google Scholar
  22. Lowrance R, Johnson Jr. JC, Newton GL & Williams RG (1998) Denitrification from soils of a year-round forage production system fertilized with liquid dairy manure. J Environ Qual 27: 1504–1511Google Scholar
  23. Lucero D, Martens D, McKenna J & Starner D (1995) Poultry litter effects on unmanaged pasture yield, nitrogen and phosphorus uptakes, and botanical composition. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 26: 861–881Google Scholar
  24. Malone JP, Stevens RJ & Laughlin RJ (1998) Combining the 15N and acetylene inhibition techniques to examine the effect of acetylene on denitrification. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 31–37Google Scholar
  25. Marshall SB, Wood CW, Braun LC, Cabrera ML, Mullen MD & Guertal EA (1998) Ammonia volatilization from tall fescue pastures fertilized with broiler litter. J Environ Qual 27: 1125–1129Google Scholar
  26. Matches AG (1979) Management. In: Buckner RC & Bush LP (eds) Tall Fescue, pp 171–200. Madison, WI: American Society of AgronomyGoogle Scholar
  27. Moal J, Martinez J, Guiziou F & Coste C (1995) Ammonia volatilization following surface-applied pig and cattle slurry in France. J Agric Sci 125: 245–252Google Scholar
  28. Nathan MV & Malzer GL (1994) Dynamics of ammonia volatilization from turkey manureand urea applied to soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58: 985–990Google Scholar
  29. National Atmospheric Deposition Program (1995) Wet deposition in the United States – 1995. Federal acid precip task force Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Ritter W & Chirnside A (1987) Influence of agricultural practices on nitrates in the water table aquifer. Biol Wastes 19: 165–178Google Scholar
  31. Rolston DE (1986) Limitations of the acetylene blockage technique for field measurement of denitrification. In: Hauck RD & Weaver RW (eds) Field Measurement of Dinitrogen Fixation and Denitrification, pp 93–101. SSSA special publication No. 18. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryden JC (1982) Effects of acetylene on nitrification and denitrification in two soils during incubation with ammonium nitrate. J Soil Sci 33: 263–270Google Scholar
  33. Ryden JC (1983) Denitrification loss from a grassland soil in the field receiving different rates of nitrogen as ammonium nitrate. J Soil Sci 34: 355–365Google Scholar
  34. Schjoerring J, Sommer S & Ferm M (1992) A simple passive sampler for measuring ammonia emission in the field. Water Air Soil Pollut 62: 13–24Google Scholar
  35. Scott HD, Mauromoustakos A & Gilmour JT (1995) Fate of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus in broiler litter applied to tall fescue. Arkansas Agric Exp Stn Bull 947. Univ of Arkansas Fayetteville, ARGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharpe RR, Harper LA, Giddens JE & Langdale GW (1988) Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen budget for conservation tilled wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 52: 1394–1398Google Scholar
  37. Sharpley A N, Smith S & Bain W (1993) Nitrogen and phosphorus fate from long-term poultry litter applications to Oklahoma soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57: 1131–1137Google Scholar
  38. Sims GK, Ellsworth TR & Mulvaney RL (1995) Microscale determination of inorganic nitrogen in water and soil extracts. Commun in Soil Sci and Plant Anal 26: 303–316Google Scholar
  39. Smith C, Freney J, Chalk P, Galbally I, McKenney D & Cai G (1988) Fate of urea nitrogen applied in solution in furrows to sunflowers growing on a red-brown earth: transformations, losses and plant uptake. Austral J Agri Res 39: 793–806Google Scholar
  40. Soil Conservation Service (1981) Land resources regions and major land resources areas of the US. USDA-SCS Agric Handb 296. US Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Stevens R & Logan H 1987 Determination of the volatilization of ammonia from surface applied cattle slurry by the micrometeorological mass balance method. J Agric Sci Camb 109: 205–207Google Scholar
  42. Thornton FC, Shurpali NJ, Bock BR & Reddy KC (1998) N2O and NO emissions from poultry litter and urea applications to bermuda grass. Atmos Environ 32: 1623–1630Google Scholar
  43. Tiedje JM (1988) Ecology of denitrification and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium. In: Zehnder AJB (ed) Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms, pp 179–244. New York: John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  44. Tiedje JM, Simkins S & Groffman PM (1989) Perspectives on measurement of denitrification in the field including recommended protocols for acetylene based methods. In: Clarholm M and Bergström L (eds) Ecology of Arable Land, pp 217–240. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  45. USDA (1994) Livestock, dairy, and poultry statistics and outlook. Econ Res Serv USDA Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  46. USDA (1998) Poultry: production and value – supplement (PBHBB) 1997 summary. NASS Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. USDA/USEPA (1979) Animal waste utilization on cropland and pastureland: A manual for evaluating agronomic and environmental effects. USDA, Washington, DC, 135 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. USEPA (1975) Water programs: national interior primary drinking water regulations. Federal Register 40: 248Google Scholar
  49. Whitehead D & Bristow AW (1990) Transformations of nitrogen following the application of 15N-labelled cattle urine to an established grass sward. J Appl Ecol 27: 667–678Google Scholar
  50. Wilhoit JH, Bannon JS & Ling Q (1993) Development and evaluation of a drop applicator for poultry litter. ASAE Paper No 93–4023. Am Soc Agric Eng, St. Joseph, MOGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilkinson S (1979) Plant Nutrient and Economic Value of Animal Manures. J Anim Sci 48: 121–133Google Scholar
  52. Wood BH, Wood CW, Yoo KH, Yoon KS & Delaney DP (1996) Nutrient accumulation and nitrate leaching under broiler litter amended corn fields. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 27: 2875–2894Google Scholar
  53. Wood CW (1992) Broiler litter as a fertilizer: benefits and environmental concerns. In: Proc National Poultry Waste Management Symp, pp 304–312. Birmingham, Auburn University ALGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel B. Marshall
    • 1
  • Michael D. Mullen
    • 2
  • Miguel L. Cabrera
    • 3
  • C. Wesley Wood
    • 4
  • Lois C. Braun
    • 3
  • Elizabeth A. Guertal
    • 4
  1. 1.USDA-ARSFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Soil SciencesUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  4. 4.Department of Agronomy and SoilsAuburn UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations