Plant Ecology

, Volume 147, Issue 2, pp 237–250 | Cite as

How do depth, duration and frequency of flooding influence the establishment of wetland plant communities?

  • Michelle T. Casanova
  • Margaret A. Brock
Article

Abstract

In many temporary wetlands such as those on the Northern Tablelands of New South Wales Australia, the development of plant communities is largely the result of germination and establishment from a long-lived, dormant seed bank, and vegetative propagules that survive drought. In these wetlands the pattern of plant zonation can differ from year to year and season to season, and depth is not always a good indicator of the plant community composition in different zones. In order to determine which aspects of water regime (depth, duration or frequency of flooding) were important in the development of plant communities an experiment using seed bank material from two wetlands was undertaken over a 16 week period in late spring–early summer 1995–1996. Seed bank samples were exposed to 17 different water-level treatments with different depths, durations and frequencies of flooding. Species richness and biomass of the communities that established from the seed bank were assessed at the end of the experiment and the data were examined to determine which aspects of water regime were important in the development of the different communities. It was found that depth, duration and frequency of inundation influenced plant community composition, but depth was least important, and also that the duration of individual flooding events was important in segregating the plant communities. Species were grouped according to their ability to tolerate or respond to fluctuations in flooding and drying. The highest biomass and species richness developed in pots that were never flooded. Least biomass and species richness developed in pots that were continuously flooded. Short frequent floods promoted high species richness and biomass especially of Amphibious fluctuation-tolerator species and Amphibious fluctuation-responder species that have heterophylly. Terrestrial species were able to establish during dry phases between short floods. Depth was important in determining whether Amphibious fluctuation-tolerator or Amphibious fluctuation-responder species had greater biomass. Longer durations of flooding lowered species richness and the biomass of terrestrial species. Experiments of this kind can assist in predicting vegetation response to water-level variation in natural and modified wetlands.

Disturbance Fluctuations Seed bank Water-level Water regime Zonation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous 1993. Minitab for Windows. Release 9. Minitab Inc. State College P.A.Google Scholar
  2. Bornette, G. & Amoros, C. 1996. Disturbance regimes and vegetation dynamics: role of floods in riverine wetlands. J. Veg. Sci. 7: 615–622.Google Scholar
  3. Bornette, G., Henry, C., Barrat, M-H. & Amoros, C. 1994. Theoretical habitat templets, species traits and species richness: aquatic macrophytes in the Upper Rhone River and its flood plain. Freshwater Biol. 31: 487–505.Google Scholar
  4. Boulton, A. J. & Brock, M. A. 1999. Australian Freshwater Ecology: Processes and Management. Gleneagles Publishing, Adelaide, Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Britton, D. L. & Brock, M. A. 1994. Seasonal germination from wetland seed banks. Aust. J. Marine Freshwater Res. 45: 1445–1458.Google Scholar
  6. Brock, M. A. 1986. Adaptation to fluctuations rather than extremes of environmental parameters. Pp. 131–140. In De Decker, P. & Williams, W. D. (Eds), Limnology in Australia. CSIRO/Junk, Canberra/Denmark.Google Scholar
  7. Brock, M. A. 1991. Mechanisms for maintaining persistent populations of Myriophyllum variifolium J. Hooker in a fluctuating shallow Australian lake. Aquatic Bot. 39: 211–219.Google Scholar
  8. Brock, M. A. 1998. Are temporary wetlands resilient? Evidence from seed banks of Australian and South African wetlands. Pp. 193–206. In: McComb, A. J. & Davis, J. A. (Eds), Wetlands for the Future: Contributions from INTECOL's V International Wetlands Conference. Gleneagles Publishing, Adelaide.Google Scholar
  9. Brock, M. A. & Britton, D. L. 1995. The role of seed banks in the revegetation of Australian temporary wetlands. In: Wheeler, B. D., Shaw, S. C., Fojt, W. & Robertson, R. A. (Eds), Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. John Wiley & Sons, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  10. Brock, M. A., Smith, R. G. B. & Jarman, P. J. 1999. Drain it, dam it: alteration of water regime in shallow wetlands on the New England Tableland of New South Wales, Australia. Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 7: 37–46.Google Scholar
  11. Brock, M. A., Theodore, K. & O'Donnell, L. 1994. Seed bank methods for Australian wetlands. Aust. J. Marine Freshwater Res. 45: 483–93.Google Scholar
  12. Bunn, S. E., Boon, P. I., Brock, M. A. & Schofield, N. J. 1997. National Wetlands R & D Program Scoping Review. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation Occasional Paper 01/97 Canberra.Google Scholar
  13. Casanova, M. T. 1993. The Ecology of Charophytes in Temporary and Permanent Wetlands: An Australian Perspective. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia. 319 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Casanova, M. T. and Brock, M. A. 1990. Germination and establishment of charophytes from the seed bank of an Australian temporary lake. Aquatic Bot., 36: 247–254.Google Scholar
  15. Chesterfield, D. A. 1986. Changes in the vegetation of the river red gum forest at Barmah, Victoria. Aust. Forestry 49: 4–15.Google Scholar
  16. Connell, J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.Google Scholar
  17. Denton, M. & Ganf, G. G. 1994. Response of juvenile Melaleuca halmatororum to flooding: management implications for a seasonal wetland, Bool Lagoon, South Australia. Aust. J. Marine Freshwater Res. 45: 1395–1408.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, W. J, Brown, M. B., Engleman, L. & Jenrich, R. T. 1990. BMDP Statistical Software Manual. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  19. Haworth, R. J., Gale, S. J., Short, S. A. & Heijnis, H. 1999. Land use and Lake sedimentation on the New England Tablelands of New South Wales, Australia. Aust. Geog. 30: 51–73.Google Scholar
  20. Keddy, P. A. & Reznicek, A. A. 1986. Great Lakes vegetation dynamics: the role of fluctuating water levels and buried seeds. J. Great Lakes Res. 12: 25–36.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, D. S. & Rogers, K. H. 1985. Seasonality/aseasonality of aquatic macrophytes in southern hemisphere inland waters. Hydrobiologia 125: 137–150.Google Scholar
  22. Rea, N. & Ganf, G. G. 1994. How emergent plants experience water regime in a Mediterranean-type wetland. Aquatic Bot. 49: 117–136.Google Scholar
  23. Roberts, J. 1994. Riverbanks, plants and water management. Pp. 1–7. In: Roberts, J. & Oliver, R. (eds), The Murrumbidgee, Past and Present. CSIRO Water Resources, Griffith.Google Scholar
  24. Schneider, R. 1994. The role of hydrologic regime in maintaining rare plant communities of New Yorks coastal plain pondshores. Biol. Cons. 68: 253–260.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, R. G. B. 1998. The effect of water regime on Juncus articulatus L. and Glyceria australis C.E.Hubb. in the New England Lagoons. Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of New England, Armidale, NSW Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, R. G. B. & Brock, M. A. 1996. Coexistence of Juncus articulatus L. and Glyceria maxima C.E. Hubb. in a temporary shallow wetland in Australia. Hydrobiologia 341: 147–151.Google Scholar
  27. Spence, D. H. N. 1967. Factors controlling the distribution of freshwater macrophytes with particular reference to the lochs of Scotland. J. Ecol. 55: 147–170.Google Scholar
  28. Tabacchi, E. 1995. Structural variability and invasions of pioneer plant communities in riparian habitats of the middle Ardour River (SW France). Can. J. Bot. 73: 33–44.Google Scholar
  29. van den Brink, F. W. B., van der Velde, G., Bossman, W. W. & Coops, H. 1995. Effects of substrate parameters on growth responses of eight helophyte species in relation to flooding. Aquatic Bot. 50: 79–97.Google Scholar
  30. van der Valk, A. G. 1981. Succession in wetlands: a Gleasonion approach. Ecology 62: 688–696.Google Scholar
  31. van der Valk, A. G. & Davis, C. B. 1978. The role of seed banks in the vegetation dynamics of prairie glacial marshes. Ecology 59: 322–335.Google Scholar
  32. Weiher, E. & Keddy, P. A. 1995. The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73: 323–335.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelle T. Casanova
    • 1
  • Margaret A. Brock
    • 1
  1. 1.Botany, School of Rural Science and Natural ResourcesUniversity of New EnglandArmidale, New South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations