Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 58, Issue 1–3, pp 311–314 | Cite as

The Effects of Cultural Practices on Methane Emission from Rice Fields

  • J.-Y. Ko
  • H.-W. Kang
Article

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in a clayey soil to determine the effects of cultural practices on methane (CH4) emissions from rice fields. The factors evaluated were a) direct seeding on dry vs wet soil, b) age of transplanted seedlings (8 d old and 30 d old), and c) fall vs spring plowing. Methane emissions were measured weekly throughout the rice-growing season using a closed static chamber technique. Transplanted 8-d-old seedlings showed the highest emission of 42.4 g CH4 m−2 season−1, followed by transplanted 30-d-seedlings (40.3 g CH4 m−2 season−1), and direct seeding on wet soil (37.1 g CH4 m−2 season−1). Direct seeding on dry soil registered the least emission of 26.9 g CH4 m−2 season−1. Thus transplanting 30-d-old seedlings, direct seeding on wet soil, and direct seeding on dry soil reduced CH4 emission by 5%, 13%, and 37%, respectively, when compared with transplanting 8-d-old seedlings. Methane emission under spring plowing was 42.0 g CH4 m−2 season−1 and that under fall plowing was 31.3 g CH4 m−2 seasons−1. The 26% lower emission in the field plowed in spring was caused by degradation of organic matter over the winter.

direct seeding transplanted seedling plowing time 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cole V et al. (1996) Agricultural options for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. In: Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (eds) Climate Change 1995 Impacts. p 745-771. Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific Technical Analyses. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Houghton JT, Meria Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A & Maskell K (eds) (1996) Climate Change 1995. The Science of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Inubushi K, Muramatsu Y & Umebayashi M (1992) Influence of percolation on methane emission from flooded paddy soil. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 63:184–189Google Scholar
  4. Liang Sicui & Gen Yang (1994) Possibility for reducing methane emission from rice fields in China. Int Rice Res Notes 19(3):39–40Google Scholar
  5. Minami K (1993) Methane from rice production. Res Rep Div Environ Planning 9: 243–258Google Scholar
  6. Neue HU & Sass R (1994) Trace gas emissions from rice fields. In: Prinn R (ed) Global Atmospheric-Biospheric Chemistry. Plenum Press, New York, USA, pp 119–148Google Scholar
  7. Neue HU, Wassmann R, Lantin RS, Alberto MC & Aduna JB (1994) Effect of fertilization on methane emission. Int Rice Res Notes 19(3):33–34Google Scholar
  8. Parashar DC, Mitra AP, Shinha SK, Gupta PK, Sharma RC, Singh N, Kaul S, Lal G, Chaudhay A, Ray HS, Das SN, Parida KM, Rao SB, Kanung SP, Ramasami T, Nair BU, Swamy M, Gupta SK, Singh AR, Saikia BK, Barua AKS, Pathak MG, Iyer CPS, Gopalakrishnan M, Sane PV, Singh SN, Banerjee R, Sethunathan N, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Palit P, Saha AK, Purkait NN, Chaturvedi GS, Sen SP, Sen M, Sarkar B, Banik A, Subbaraya BH, Lal S & Venkatramani (1994) Methane budget from Indian paddy fields. In: CH4 and N2O-Global Emissions and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial Sources. NIAES Series 2: p 27–39Google Scholar
  9. Shin YK (1996) Mitigation options for methane emission from rice fields in Korea. Ambio 25(4):289–291Google Scholar
  10. Takai Y, Koyama T & Kamura T(1956) Microbial metabolism in reduction process of paddy soils (Part 1). Soil Plant Food 2:63–66Google Scholar
  11. Thurlow M, Kanda K, Tsuruta H & Minami K (1995) Methane uptake by unflooded paddy soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 41:371–375Google Scholar
  12. Wang ZP, DeLaune RD, Masscheleyn PH & Patrick Jr WH (1993) Soil redox and pH effects on methane production in a flooded rice soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:382–385Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • J.-Y. Ko
    • 1
  • H.-W. Kang
    • 1
  1. 1.Rural Development Administration, MilyangNational Yeongnam Agricultural Experiment StationKyweongnamKorea

Personalised recommendations