Advances in Health Sciences Education

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 39–48 | Cite as

Using Computerized Adaptive Testing to Evaluate Nurse Competence for Licensure: Some History and Forward Look

  • Anthony R. Zara

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Council on Education (1995). Guidelines for Computerized-Adaptive Test Development and Use in Education. Washington DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  3. Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 453–479.Google Scholar
  4. Green, B. F., Bock, R. D., Humphries, L. G., Linn, R. L. & Reckase, M. D. (1984). Technical guidelines for assessing computerized adaptive tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(4), 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nihoff Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Hofer, P. J. & Green B. F. (1985). The challenge of competence and creativity in computerized psychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 826–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kiely, G. L., Zara, A. R. & Weiss, D. J. (1986). Equivalence of Computer-Administered and Paper-and-Pencil ASVAB Tests (AFHRL-TP–86–13). Manpower and Personnel Division, Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.Google Scholar
  8. Kingsbury G. G. & Weiss, D. J. (1979). An Adaptive Testing Strategy for Mastery Decisions (Research Report 79–5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.Google Scholar
  9. Kingsbury G. G. & Weiss, D. J. (1981). A Validity Comparison of Adaptive and Conventional Strategies for Mastery Testing (Research Report 81–3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.Google Scholar
  10. Kingsbury G. G. & Weiss, D. J. (1983). A comparison of IRT-based adaptive mastery testing and a sequential mastery procedure. In D. J. Weiss (Ed.), New Horizons in Testing: Latent Trait Theory and Computerized Adaptive Testing. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Kingsbury, G. G. & Zara, A. R. (1989). Procedures for selecting items for computerized adaptive tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lord, F. M. (1952). A theory of test scores. Psychometric Monograph (7).Google Scholar
  13. Lord, F.M. (1977). A broad-range tailored test of verbal ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 95–100.Google Scholar
  14. National Council of State Boards of Nursing (1989). Collected Works on the Legal Aspects of Computerized Adaptive Testing. Author: Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut.Google Scholar
  16. Urry, V. W. (1977). Tailored testing: A successful application of latent trait theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 14, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Weiss, D. J. (1974). Strategies of Adaptive Ability Measurement (Research Report 74–5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.Google Scholar
  18. Weiss, D. J. (Ed.) (1978). Proceedings of the 1977 Computerized Adaptive Testing Conference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology, Psychometric Methods Program.Google Scholar
  19. Weiss, D. J. (1982). Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 473–492.Google Scholar
  20. Zara, A. R. (April, 1992). A Comparison of Computerized Adaptive and Paper-and-Pencil Versions of the National RN Licensure Examination. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony R. Zara
    • 1
  1. 1.National Council of State Boards of Nursing Inc. (National Council)ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations