Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 147, Issue 1, pp 21–35 | Cite as

Vegetation and microclimatic edge effects in two mixed-mesophytic forest fragments

  • Sophia M. Gehlhausen
  • Mark W. Schwartz
  • Carol K. Augspurger
Article

Abstract

Forest edges are known to consist of microenvironments that may provide habitat for a different suite of species than forest interiors. Several abiotic attributes of the microenvironment may contribute to this change across the edge to center gradient (e.g., light, air temperature, soil moisture, humidity). Biotic components, such as seed dispersal, may also give rise to changes in species composition from forest edge to interior. We predicted that abiotic and biotic measures would correlate with distance from forest edge and would differ among aspects. To test these predictions, we measured abiotic and biotic variables on twelve 175 m transects in each of two 24 ha forest fragments in east-central Illinois that have remained in continuous isolation for upwards of 100 years. Both univariate and multivariate techniques were used to best describe the complex relationships among abiotic factors and between abiotic and biotic factors. Results indicate that microclimatic variables differ in the degree to and distance over which they show an edge effect. Relative humidity shows the widest edge, while light and soil moisture have the steepest gradients. Aspect influences are evidenced by the existence of more pronounced edge effects on south and west edges, except when these edges are protected by adjacent habitat. Edges bordered by agricultural fields have more extreme changes in microclimate than those bordered by trees. According to PCA results, species richness correlates well with microclimatic variation, especially light and soil moisture; however, in many cases species richness had a different depth of edge influence than either of these variables. The herbaceous plant community is heavily dominated by three species. Distributions of individual species as well as changes in plant community composition, estimated with a similarity index, indicate that competition may be influencing the response of the vegetation to the edge to interior gradient. This study indicates that edge effects must be considered when the size and potential buffering habitat of forest preserves are planned.

Buffer zone Conservation Edge effects Forest fragmentation Forest microclimate Herbaceous plant community 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blake, J. G. 1983. Trophic structure of bird communities in forest patches in east-central Illinois. Wilson Bull. 95: 416–430.Google Scholar
  2. Blake, J. G. & Karr, J. R. 1984. Species composition of bird communities and the conservation benefit of large versus small forests. Biol. Cons. 30: 173–187.Google Scholar
  3. Boggess, W. R. 1964. Trelease Woods, Champaign County, Illinois: Woody vegetation and stand composition. Trans. Illinois Acad. Sci. 57: 261–271.Google Scholar
  4. Brandeis, T. J. 1988. Effects of long-term isolation of forest fragments on edge vegetation and avifauna, M.S. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign.Google Scholar
  5. Brothers, T. S. 1993. Fragmentation and edge effects in central Indiana old growth forests. Natural Areas J. 13: 268–275.Google Scholar
  6. Brothers, T. S. & Spingarn, A. 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Cons. Biol. 6: 91–100.Google Scholar
  7. Chazdon, R. L. & Field, C. B. 1987. Photographic estimation of photosynthetically active radiation: evaluation of a computerized technique. Oecologia 73: 525–532.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, J., Franklin, J. F. & Spies, T. A. 1992. Vegetation responses to edge environments in old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Appl. 2: 387–396.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, J., Franklin, J. F. & Spies, T. A. 1995. Growing-season microclimatic gradients from clearcut edges into old-growth Douglas-fir forests. Ecol. Appl. 5: 74–86.Google Scholar
  10. Fraver, S. 1994. Vegetation responses along edge-to-interior gradients in the mixed hardwood forests of the Roanoke river basin, North Carolina. Cons. Biol. 8: 822–832.Google Scholar
  11. Gleason H. A. 1913. The relation of forest distribution and prairie fires in the middle west. Torreya 13: 173–181.Google Scholar
  12. Grove, P. F. 1923. The ecology of Laportea canadensis. M.A. Thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Champaign.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Hatcher, L. & Stepanski, E. J. 1994. A step by step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC. 552 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Laurance, W. F. 1991. Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: application of a model for the design of nature reserves. Biol. Cons. 57: 205–219.Google Scholar
  16. Laurance, W. F. & Yensen, E. 1991. Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats. Biol. Cons. 55: 77–92.Google Scholar
  17. Laurance, W. F., Ferreira, L. V., Rankin-deMerona, J. M. & Laurance, S. G. 1998. Rain forest fragmentation and the dynamics of Amazonian tree communities. Ecology 79: 2032–2040.Google Scholar
  18. Matlack, G. R. 1993. Microenvironment variation within and among forest edge sites in the eastern United States. Biol. Cons. 66: 185–194.Google Scholar
  19. Matlack, G. R. 1994. Vegetation dynamics of the forest edge–Trends in space and successional time. J. Ecol. 82: 113–123.Google Scholar
  20. Miceli, J. C., Rolfe, G. L., Pelz, D. R. & Edgington, J. M. 1977. Brownfield Woods, Illinois: Woody vegetation and changes since 1960. Am. Midland Nat. 98: 469–476.Google Scholar
  21. Mohlenbrock, R. H. 1986. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar
  22. Mueller-Dombois, D. and Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  23. Murcia, C. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. TREE 10: 58–62.Google Scholar
  24. Noss, R. F. & Cooperrider, A. Y. 1994. Saving nature's legacy: Protecting and restoring biodiversity. Island Press, Washington D.C. and Covelo, CA.Google Scholar
  25. Palik, B. J. & Murphy, P. G. 1990. Disturbance versus edge effects in sugar maple/beechforest fragments. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 32, pp. 187–202.Google Scholar
  26. Ranney, J. W., Bruner, M. C. & Levenson, J. B. 1981. The importance of edge in the structure and dynamics of forest islands. pp. 67–95. In: Burgess, R. L. & Sharp, D. M. Forest island dynamics in a man dominated landscape. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  27. SAS 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Stevens, J. 1992. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 2nd edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  29. Swink, F. & Wilhelm, G. 1994. Plants of the Chicago Region, Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  30. Telford, C. J. 1926. Wood as a crop in Illinois. For. Circ. Illinois Natural History Survery 4: 1–15.Google Scholar
  31. ter Braak, C. J. F. 1988. CANOCO – a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by correspondence analysis, principle components analysis and redundancy analysis (version 2.1), Agricultural Mathematics Group, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  32. Wales, W. F. 1972. Vegetation analysis of north and south edges in a mature oak-hickory forest. Ecol. Monogr. 42: 451–471.Google Scholar
  33. Whitney, G. G. & Runkle, J. R. 1981. Edge versus age effects in the development of a beech maple forest. Oikos 37: 377–381.Google Scholar
  34. Young, A. & Mitchell, N. 1994. Microclimatic and vegetation edge effects in a fragmented podocarp-broadleaf forest in New Zealand. Biol. Conserv. 67: 63–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophia M. Gehlhausen
    • 1
  • Mark W. Schwartz
    • 2
  • Carol K. Augspurger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant BiologyUniversity of Illinois, Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science and Public PolicyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations