Advertisement

The Effect of a Residual Isthmus of Surviving Tissue on Conduction after Linear Ablation in Atrial Myocardium

  • Stuart P Thomas
  • Elisabeth M Wallace BSc
  • David L Ross
Article

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the size of discontinuities in lines of ablation and wavefront propagation. Discontinuities in linear radiofrequency lesions used for the treatment of atrial fibrillation may be proarrhythmic and a major clinical problem. A better understanding of the electrophysiological properties of these discontinuities (isthmuses) may assist in their detection and treatment. Linear lesions were made in the right atrial free wall using a Nd:YAG laser in 12 dogs. Conduction properties across the discontinuities were studied by pacing from either side of the lesion. Two of the three isthmuses less than 0.8mm2 in cross section (smallest 0.2mm2) conducted at extrastimulus intervals of 300ms. All three failed to conduct at cycle lengths close to the atrial effective refractory period. Isthmuses above 0.8mm2 (n}=8) conducted at all cycle lengths. Conduction slowing (mean slowest conduction 0.5\plusmn; 0.3m/s) occurred in the region of the isthmus but the overall delay was only 6plusmn; 6ms where propagation through the isthmus occurred. The effect on conduction of small discontinuities in linear lesions is dependent on the size of the residual isthmus. All but the very smallest of discontinuities in linear lesions conduct and therefore have the potential to participate in reentrant arrhythmias. Efforts should be directed toward the development of ablation techniques that reliably produce continuous transmural linear lesions for cure of atrial fibrillation and flutter.

ablation atrial flutter proarrhythmia atrium laser conduction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D'Agostino HJ, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:569–583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cox JL, Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, et al. Modification of the maze procedure for atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation: I. Rationale and surgical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:473–484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ha?ssaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, et al. Right and left atrial radiofrequency catheter therapy of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996;7: 1132–1144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaita F, Riccardi R, Calò L, et al. Atrial mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic atrial fibrillation: electrophysiological findings and ablation results. Circulation 1998;97:2136–2145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maloney JD, Milner L, Barold S, et al. Two-staged biatrial linear and focal ablation to restore sinus rhythm in patients with refractory chronic atrial fibrillation: procedure experience and follow-up beyond 1 year. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1998;21: 2527–2532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ha?ssaguerre M, Shah DC, Jais P, et al. Role of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Curr Opin Cardiol 1997;12:18–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, et al. Long-term followup after right atrial radiofrequency catheter treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophsyiol 1998;21:2533–2538.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Avitall B, Helms R, Chiang W, et al. Nonlinear atrial radiofrequency lesions are arrhythmogenic: A study of skipped lesions in the normal atria [abstract]. Circulation 1995;92:I–265.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Avitall B, Kotov A, Helms RW, et al. Transcatheter ablation of chronic atrial fibrillation in the canine rapid atrial pacing model: Is the cure worse than the disease? (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;32:32A.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomas SP, Nunn GR, Nicholson I, et al. An endocardial radiofrequency ablative technique for cure of atrial fibrillation during cardiac surgery (abstract). Circulation 1997;96:I–450.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitchell MA, McRury ID, Haines DE. Linear atrial ablations in a canine model of chronic atrial fibrillation: morphological and electrophysiological observations. Circulation 1998;97:1176–1185.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cabo C, Pertsov AM, Baxter WT, et al. Wave-front curvature as a cause of slow conduction and block in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res 1994;75:1014–1028.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fast VG, Kléber AG. Cardiac tissue geometry as a determinant of unidirectional conduction block: Assessment of microscopic excitation spread by optical mapping in patterned cell cultures and in a computer model. Cardiovasc Res 1995;29:697–707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohr S, Schölly DM, Kléber AG. Patterned growth of neonatal rat heart cells in culture: Morphological and electrophysiological characterization. Circ Res 1991;68:114–130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fast VG, Kléber AG. Block of impulse propagation at an abrupt tissue expansion: Evaluation of the critical strand diameter in 2-and 3-dimensional computer models. Cardiovasc Res 1995;30:449–459.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitchel MA, McRury ID, Everett TH, et al. Morphological and physiological characteristics of discontinuous linear atrial ablations during atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1999;10:378–386.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart P Thomas
    • 1
  • Elisabeth M Wallace BSc
    • 1
  • David L Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.The Department of CardiologyWestmead HospitalWestmeadAustralia

Personalised recommendations