Advertisement

Plant Ecology

, Volume 141, Issue 1–2, pp 99–106 | Cite as

Effects of clonal integration on plant plasticity in Fragaria chiloensis

  • Peter Alpert
Article

Abstract

The ability of clonal plants to transport substances between ramets located in different microsites also allows them to modify the plastic responses of individual ramets to local environmental conditions. By equalising concentrations of substances between ramets, physiological integration might decrease responses to local conditions. However, integration has also been observed to increase plasticity and induce novel plastic responses in ramets. To ask how integration modifies plant plasticity in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis, ramets were given either low light and high nitrogen or high light and low nitrogen, simulating a pattern of resource patchiness in their native habitat. Ramets in contrasting light/nitrogen treatments were either connected or single. Effects of light/nitrogen and connection were measured at three levels of morphological organisation, the organ, the ramet, and the clonal fragment. Connection between ramets reduced or had no effect on plastic responses in leaf size at the level of the plant organ. This suggested that integration dampened certain plastic responses. Connection induced a new plastic response at the level of the clonal fragment, an increase in allocation to vegetative reproduction in patches of low light and high nitrogen. It is concluded that clonal integration can have different effects on plant plasticity at different levels of plant organisation. It appears that, at least in this species, integration can increase plasticity at the level of the clonal fragment and concentrate vegetative reproduction in particular microsite types.

Light Nitrogen Phenotypic plasticity Physiological integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alpert, P. 1991. Nitrogen-sharing among ramets increases clonal growth in Fragaria chiloensis. Ecology 72: 69–80.Google Scholar
  2. Alpert, P. 1996. Nutrient sharing in natural clonal fragments of Fragaria chiloensis. J. Ecol. 84: 395–406.Google Scholar
  3. Alpert, P. & Mooney, H. A. 1986. Resource sharing among ramets in the clonal herb, Fragaria chiloensis. Oecologia 70: 227–233.Google Scholar
  4. Alpert, P. & Mooney, H. A. 1996. Resource heterogeneity generated by shrubs and topography on coastal sand dunes. Vegetatio 122: 83–93.Google Scholar
  5. Alpert, P. & Stuefer, J. F. 1997. Division of labour in clonal plants. Pp. 137–154. In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds), The ecology and physiology of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, A. D. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genet. 13: 115–155.Google Scholar
  7. de Kroon, H. & Hutchings, M. J. 1995. Morphological plasticity in clonal plants: the foraging concept reconsidered. J. Ecol. 83: 143–152.Google Scholar
  8. de Kroon, H. & Kalliola, R. 1995. Shoot dynamics of the giant grass Gynerium sagittatum in Peruvian Amazon floodplains, a clonal plant that does show self-thinning. Oecologia 101: 124–131.Google Scholar
  9. Dong, M. 1995. Morphological responses to local light conditions in clonal herbs from contrasting habitats, and their modification due to physiological integration. Oecologia 101: 282–288.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, J. P. & Cain, M. L. 1995. A spatially explicit test of foraging behavior in a clonal plant. Ecology 76: 1147–1155.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, D. & Alpert, P. 1991. Reciprocal transport between ramets increases growth of Fragaria chiloensis when light and nitrogen occur in separate patches but only if patches are rich. Oecologia 86: 76–80.Google Scholar
  12. Hickman, J. C. (ed.) 1993. The Jepson manual. Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchings, M. J. 1997. Resource allocation patterns in clonal herbs and their consequences for growth. Pp. 161–189. In Bazzaz, F. A. & Grace, J. (eds), Plant resource allocation. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchings, M. J. & Bradbury, I. K. 1986. Ecological perspectives on clonal perennial herbs. BioScience 36: 178–182.Google Scholar
  15. Hutchings, M. J. & Price, E. A. C. 1993. Does physiological integration enable clonal herbs to integrate the effects of environmental heterogeneity? Plant Spec. Biol. 8: 95–105.Google Scholar
  16. Hutchings, M. J. & Wijesinghe, D. K. 1997. Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 390–394.Google Scholar
  17. Marshall, C. 1990. Source-sink relations of interconnected ramets. Pp. 23–41. In: van Groenendael, J. & de Kroon, H. (eds), Clonal growth in plants – regulation and function. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  18. Méthy, M., Alpert, P. & Roy, J. 1990. Effects of light quality and quantity on growth of the clonal plant Eichhornia crassipes. Oecologia 84: 265–271.Google Scholar
  19. Sachs, T. & Hassidim, M. 1996. Mutual support and selection between branches of damaged plants. Vegetatio 127: 25–30.Google Scholar
  20. Sachs, T. & Novoplansky, A. 1997. What does aclonal organization suggest concerning clonal plants? Pp. 55–77. In: de Kroon, H. & van Groenendael, J. (eds), The ecology and evolution of plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  21. Scheiner, S. M. 1993. Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. System. 24: 35–68.Google Scholar
  22. Stuefer, J. F., de Kroon, H. & During, H. J. 1996. Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. Funct. Ecol. 10: 328–334.Google Scholar
  23. Turkington, R., Hamilton, R. S. & Gliddon, C. 1991. Withinpopulation variation in localized and integrated responses of Trifolium repens to biotically patchy environments.Oecologia 86: 183–192.Google Scholar
  24. Wilkinson, L. 1990. SYSTAT: the system for statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Alpert
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations