Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 147–155 | Cite as

A comparison of triple superphosphate and Gafsa ground rock phosphate fertilisers as P-sources for grass-clover swards on a poorly-drained acid clay soil

  • D. Scholefield
  • R.D. Sheldrick
  • T.M. Martyn
  • R.H. Lavender
Article

Abstract

Organic farming practice prohibits the use of triple superphosphate (TSP) as a source of phosphorus. As basic slag is not now generally available, interest is focused on the relative value of ground rock phosphate (GRP). A comparison of TSP and Gafsa GRP was made during 1988–92 as to their ability to increase DM production under cutting from newly sown grass/white clover swards established in 1987 on an acid clay soil in SW England. Averaged over the different P fertiliser inputs and years, the DM yield was 8.0 t ha-1 y-1 (range 6.93–9.81) compared to 6.3t ha-1y-1 (range 6.00–7.71) without added P. Lime was added at either 3 or 6t ha-1 in 1987, and at half these rates in 1990. Whereas the yield improved by 45% with P at the lower rate of lime, it improved only by 12% at the higher rate. When P fertiliser was applied annually at 30 kg ha-1, TSP was superior to GRP, but when applied in one initial dose of 120 kg ha-1, GRP was superior over the subsequent 4 year period. There was no consistent effect of the addition of either P or lime on the clover content of the sward. The alkaline bicarbonate soil test (Olsen P) was a good predictor of available P within a given year; there was a general reduction of P availability over the course of the experiment. Mechanisms to explain the longer term effectiveness of GRP are postulated and discussed. It is concluded that farmers who are limited to using GRP rather than TSP would suffer a yield penalty over the longer term of 11.5%, and that P fertilizer for the ley phase in a rotation should be incorporated in one dose at the outset.

bicarbonate-extractable soil phosphorus Lolium perenne - Trifolium repens association organic forage production rock phosphate superphosphate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Black CA and Goring CAI (1953) Determination of organically bound phosphorus in soils. Agronomy 4: 123–152.Google Scholar
  2. Bolland MDA and Gilkes RJ (1995) Long-term residual value of North Carolina and Queensland rock phosphates compared with triple superphosphate. Fert Res 41: 151–158Google Scholar
  3. Bolland MDA, Kumar Vijay & Gilkes RJ (1994) A comparison of five soil phosphorus tests for five crop species for soil previously fertilised with superphosphate and rock phosphate. Fert Res 37: 125–132.Google Scholar
  4. Bolland MDA, Clarke MF and Yeates JS (1995) Effectiveness of rock phosphate, coastal superphosphate and single superphosphate for pasture on deep sandy soils. Fert Res 41: 129–143.Google Scholar
  5. Cavell AJ (1955) The colorimetric determination of phosphorus in plant materials. J Sci Food Agric. 6: 479–480.Google Scholar
  6. Clement CR & Hopper MJ (1968) The supply of potassium to high yielding cut grass. N.A.A.S. Quant Rev No 79, pp 100–109.Google Scholar
  7. Dalton JD, Russell GC & Sieling DH (1952) Effect of organic matter on phosphate availability. Soil Sci 73: 173–181.Google Scholar
  8. Drake M & Steckel JE (1955) Solubilization of soil and rock phosphate as related to root cation exchange capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 19: 449–450.Google Scholar
  9. Frame J & Newbould P (1986) Agronomy of white clover. Ad. Agron. 40: 1–88.Google Scholar
  10. Genstat Committee (1987) Genstat 5 Reference Manual, Clarenden Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Hall D (1947) Fertilizers and Manures. pp 79–128. John Murray, London.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins JMB & Scholefield D (1996) Molybdate reactive phosphorus losses in surface and drainage water from systems of grazed grassland. J Env Qual. 25: 727–732Google Scholar
  13. Hopkins A & Gilbey J (1995) An evaluation of the performance of two white clover varieties and a resident white clover on an acid, permanent grassland soil. Plant Varieties and Seeds 8: 65–72Google Scholar
  14. Kumar Vijay, Bolland MDA & Gilkes RJ (1994) Comparison of the Pi, Colwell, Bray L, calcium acetate lactate (CAL) and Truog soil phosphorus test for predicting growth of oats, barley, tritical and clover in the field in lateritic soils fertiliser with superphosphate and root phosphate. Fert Res 37: 115–124Google Scholar
  15. Lazenby A (1981) British grasslands; past present and future. Grass and Forage science 36: 243–266Google Scholar
  16. Naidu R, Syers JK, Tillman RW & Kirkham JH (1990) Effect of liming on phosphate sorption by acid soils. J Soil Sci 41: 165–175Google Scholar
  17. Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS & Dean LS. (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils with sodium bicarbonate. US Dept Agric Circ No 939Google Scholar
  18. Robinson JS & Syers JK (1990) A critical evaluation of the factors influencing the dissolution of Gafsa phosphate rock. J Soil Sci. 41: 597–605Google Scholar
  19. Scholefield D & Stone AC (1995) Nutrient losses in runoff water following application of different fertiliser to grassland cut for silage. Ag Ecosys Env 55: 181–191Google Scholar
  20. Sheldrick RD, Lavender RH, Tewson VJ & Cobby JM (1985) The effect on annual dry matter yield of using a hand-controlled mower or a plot harvester for cutting herbage on small-plot trials. Grass and For Sci 40: 103–107Google Scholar
  21. Stewart AB (1953) Soil and Fertiliser Phosphorus, pp 427–448. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Syers JK, Mackay AD, Brown MW & Currie LD (1986) Chemical and physical characteristics of phosphate rock materials of varying reactivity. J Sci Fd Agric 37: 1057–1064Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Scholefield
    • 1
  • R.D. Sheldrick
    • 1
  • T.M. Martyn
    • 1
  • R.H. Lavender
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Grassland and Environmental ResearchOkehampton, DevonUK

Personalised recommendations