The Journal of Ethics

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 375–397 | Cite as

Objecting Morally

  • C.A.J. Coady

Abstract

Just war theory entails that some wars may be morally unjustifiable, and hence citizens may be right to object morally to their government's waging of a war and to their being compelled to serve in it. Given the evils attendant upon even justified war, this fact sharply restricts any “obligation to die for the state,” and raises important questions about the appropriate state response to selective conscientious objectors. This paper argues that such people should be legally accommodated, and discusses objections to doing so, in particular, the possible erosion of the state's capacity to wage justified war, the unfairness of granting such exemptions from military service, and the impossibility of determining genuinely conscientious objection.

conscience fairness inscrutability just war mixed motives moral free-riding religion selective conscientious objection self-defence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.A.J. Coady
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations