Plant Ecology

, Volume 139, Issue 1, pp 71–80 | Cite as

Microhabitat differentiation in Chiuhuahuan Desert plant communities

  • Qinfeng Guo


The effects of microhabitat differentiation on small-scale plant community structure in the Chiuhuahuan Desert were studied using multivariate analysis. The results showed that microhabitats (i.e., kangaroo rat mounds, ant mounds, shrubs, half-shrubs, and open areas) played a critical role in structuring small-scale plant community structure and maintaining species diversity. Annual plants were much more sensitvive to the presence of differentiated microhabitats than perennials and winter annuals exhibited stronger microhabitat perferences than summer annuals. Species diversity was highest on ant mounds while open areas supported the lowest diversity during both winter and summer. Biomass was highest in the shrub habitats followed by kangaroo rat mounds, ant mounds, half-shrubs, and open areas. Much of the diversity of these plants could be explained by the individualistic responses of species to the biotic effect of other plants or to disturbance by animals, or individualistic responses of species to differences in microenvironments.

Annuals Chihuahuan Desert Coexistence Microhabitat differentiation Community structure Species diversity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beatley, J. C. 1967. Survival of winter annuals in the northern Mojave Desert. Ecology 48: 745-750.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. H., Davidson, D. W., Munger, J. C. & Inouye, R. S. 1986. Experimental community ecology: the desert granivore system. Pp. 41-61. In: Diamond, J. & Case, T. J. (eds.), Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. H. & Heske, E. J. 1990. Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250: 1705-1707.Google Scholar
  4. Chesson, P. L. 1986. Environmental variation and the coexistence species. Pp. 240-256. In: Diamond, J. & Case, T. (eds.), Community Ecology, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Chesson, P. L. & Huntly, N. 1985. Coexistence of competitors in spatially and temporally varying environments: a look at the combined effects of different sorts of variability. Theor. Pop. Biol. 28: 263-287.Google Scholar
  6. Ehleringer, J. 1985. Annuals and perennials of warm deserts. Pp. 162-180. In: Chabot, B. F. & Mooney, H. A. (eds.), Physiological ecology of North American plant communities, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  7. Fox, G. A. 1989. Consequences of lowering-time variation in a desert annual: adaptation and history. Ecology 70: 1294-1306.Google Scholar
  8. Grace, J. 1977. Plant responses to wind. Academic Press. London.Google Scholar
  9. Gray, R. & Bonner, J. 1948. An inhibitor of plant growth from the leaves of Encelia farnosa. American J. Bot. 35: 52-57.Google Scholar
  10. Gunster, A. 1993. Microhabitat differentiation among serotinous plants in the Namib Desert. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 585-590.Google Scholar
  11. Guo, Q. 1996. Effects of bannertail kangaroo rat mounds on smallscale plant community structure. Oecologia 106: 247-256.Google Scholar
  12. Guo, Q. & Berry, W. L. 1998. Species richness and biomass: dissection of the hump-shaped relationships. Ecology 79.Google Scholar
  13. Guo, Q. & Brown, J. H. 1996. Temporal fluctuations and experiment effects in desert plant communities. Oecologia 107: 568-577.Google Scholar
  14. Guo, Q. & Brown, J. H. 1997. Interactions between winter and summer annuals in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 110: 123-128.Google Scholar
  15. Guo, Q., Rundel, P. W. and Goodall, D. W. 1998. Horizontal and vertical distribution of desert seed banks: patterns, causes, and implications. J. Arid Env. 38: 465-478.Google Scholar
  16. Gutierrez, J. R. & Whitford, W. G. 1987. Chihuahuan Desert annuals: importance of water and nitrogen. Ecology 68: 2032-2045.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkins, L. K. & Nicoletto, P. F. 1992. Kangaroo rat burrows structure the spatial organization of ground-dwelling animals in a semiarid grassland. J. Arid Env. 12: 199-208.Google Scholar
  18. Heske, E. J., Brown, J. H. & Guo, Q. 1993. Effects of Kangaroo rat exclusion on vegetation structure and plant species diversity in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 95: 520-524.Google Scholar
  19. Inouye, R. S. 1991. Population biology of desert annual plants. Pp. 27-54. In: Poils, G. A. (ed.), The ecology of desert communities, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, H. T. 1966. The effects of microclimate on spring flowering phenology. Ecology 47: 407-415.Google Scholar
  21. James, F. C. 1990. Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: Panacea or Pandora’s box? Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 129-166.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, H. G. 1983. Plants and microclimate. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Lawley, D. N. 1959. Tests of significance in canonical analysis. Biometrika 46: 59-66Google Scholar
  24. Lowe, C. H. & Hinds, D. S. 1977. Effects of palo verde (Cercidium) trees on the radiation flux at ground level in the Sonoran Desert in winter. Oecologia 52: 916-922.Google Scholar
  25. Martinsen, G. D., Cushman, J. H. & Whitham, T. G. 1990. Impact of pocket gopher disturbance on plant species diversity in a shortgrass prairie community. Oecologia 83: 132-138.Google Scholar
  26. Muller, C. H. 1953. The association of desert annuals with shrubs. Am. J. Bot. 40: 53-60.Google Scholar
  27. Muller, W. H. & Muller, C. H. 1956. Association patterns involving desert plants that contain toxic products. Am. J. Bot. 43: 354- 360.Google Scholar
  28. Mulroy, T. W. & Rundel, P. W. 1977. Annual plants: adaptation to desert environments. Bio Science 27: 109-114.Google Scholar
  29. Mun, H. T. & Whitford, W. G. 1990. Factors affecting annual plants assemblages on banner-tailed kangaroo rat mounds. J. Arid Env. 18: 165-173.Google Scholar
  30. Naiman, R. J. 1988. Animal influences on ecosystem dynamics. Bio Science 38: 750-752.Google Scholar
  31. Neilson, R. P. 1986. High-resolution climatic analysis and southwest biogeography. Science 232: 27-34.Google Scholar
  32. Olsvig-Whittaker, L. S., Vaveh, Z., Giskin, M. & Nevo, E. 1992. Microsite differentiation in a Mediterranean oak savanna. J. Veg. Sci. 3: 209-216.Google Scholar
  33. Price, M. V. 1978. The role of microhabitat in structuring desert rodent communities. Ecology 59: 910-921.Google Scholar
  34. Rastetter, E. B., King, A. W., Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., O’Neill, R. V. & Hobbie, J. E. 1992. Aggregating fine-scale ecological knowledge to model coarser-scale attributes of ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 2: 55-70.Google Scholar
  35. Ricklefs, R. E. 1987. Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235: 167-171.Google Scholar
  36. Rundel, P. W., & Gibson, A. C. 1995. Ecological communities and processes in a Mojave Desert ecosystem. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. SAS, 1988. SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 6.03, Cary.Google Scholar
  38. Schlesinger, W. H., Reynolds, J. F., Cunningham, G. L., Huenneke, L. F., Jarrell, W. M., Virginia, R. A. & Whitford, W. G. 1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247: 1043-1048.Google Scholar
  39. Shmida, A. & Whittaker, R. H. 1981. Pattern and biological microsite effects in two shrub communities, southern California. Ecology 62: 234-251.Google Scholar
  40. Shreve, F. 1931. Physical conditions in sun and shade. Ecology 12: 96-104.Google Scholar
  41. Tiedemann, A. R. & Klemmedson, J. O. 1973. Nutrient availability in desert grassland soils under mesquite (Prosopis juliflora) trees and adjacent open areas. Soil Science Soc. Am. Proc. 37: 107- 110.Google Scholar
  42. van der Maarel, E. 1993. Some remarks on disturbance and its relations to diversity and stability. J. Veg; Sci. 4: 733-736.Google Scholar
  43. van der Maarel, E. 1995. Variation in species richness on small grassland quadrats: niche structure or small-scale plant mobility? J. Veg. Sci. 6: 741-752.Google Scholar
  44. Venable D. L. & Brown, J. S. 1988. The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptation for reducing risk in variable environments. Am. Nat. 131: 360-384.Google Scholar
  45. Virginia, R. A. & Jarrell, W. M. 1986. Soil properties in a mesquitedominated Sonoran Desert ecosystem. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47: 138-144.Google Scholar
  46. Went, F. W. 1942. The dependence of certain annual plants on shrubs in southern California deserts. Bull. Torry Bot. Club 69: 100-114.Google Scholar
  47. West, J. E. & Klemmedson, J. O. 1978. Structural distribution of nitrogen in desert ecosystems. Pp.1-16. In: West, N. E. & Skujins, J. (eds), Nitrogen in Desert Ecosystems, US/IBP Synthesis Series 9. Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg.Google Scholar
  48. Whittaker, R. H., & Levin, S. A. 1977. The role of mosaic phenomena in natural communities. Theor. Pop. Biol. 12: 117-139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qinfeng Guo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.School of Natural Resources, 102 Plant IndustryUniversity of NebraskaLincolnUSA)

Personalised recommendations