Plant Ecology

, Volume 135, Issue 2, pp 177–184 | Cite as

Ecological significance of the aerial seed pool of a desert lignified annual, Blepharis sindica (Acanthaceae)

  • Kenji Narita
  • Naoya Wada


Reproductive traits of a lignified annual plant, Blepharis sindica were studied in relation to the formation of an 'aerial seed pool' on dead plants in an arid grassland in the Thar Desert of northwestern India. The dead plants remained standing on the soil surface and retained fruits for more than one year. Aerial seed pools developed about 6 cm above the ground. There were no seed pools on or below the ground surface. Only 5.7% of seeds died on dead plants because of insect predation or fungi infection during one year. Seed release was cued by rainfall, and a fraction of seeds on the aerial seed pools was released in each rainfall event. After 13 rainfall events during the monsoon season, 25% of seeds was still retained on the plants. Seed predation on the ground surface was intensive; all cones placed on the soil surface were removed within four days, and 97% of fruits were removed within 10 days. Fifty percent of seeds germinated within 3.5 h, and there were no differences in viability and time required for germination between first year seeds and older seeds. The results indicate that the aerial seed-holding on dead plants is an available way to avoid seed predation in harsh desert environments where seed predation is intense and favorable periods for growth are temporally limited and unpredictable.

Aerial seed pool Blepharis sindica Desert Discontinuous seed release Germination Lignified annual Seed predation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker, H. G. 1972. Seed weight in relation to environmental conditions in California. Ecology 53: 997-1010.Google Scholar
  2. Bhandari, M. M. 1990. Flora of The Indian Desert. MPS Repros, Jodhpur, India.Google Scholar
  3. Bond, W. J. 1984. Fire survival of Cape Proteaceae - influence of fire season and seed predators. Vegetatio 56: 65-74.Google Scholar
  4. Bond, W. J. 1985. Canopy-stored seed reserves (serotiny) in Cape Proteaceae. S. Afr. J. Bot. 51: 181-186.Google Scholar
  5. Borchert, M. I. & Jain, S. K. 1978. The effect of rodent seed predation on four species of California annual grasses. Oecologia 33: 101-113.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S. & Venable, D. L. 1986. Evolutionary ecology of seed bank annuals in temporally varying environments. Am. Nat. 127: 31-47.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, D. 1966. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment. J. Theor. Biol. 12: 119-129.Google Scholar
  8. Cowling, R. M. and Lamont, B. B. 1987. Post fire recruitment of four co-occurring Banksiaspecies. J. Appl. Ecol. 24: 645-658.Google Scholar
  9. Ellner, S. & Schmida, A. 1981. Why are adaptations for long-range seed dispersal rare in desert plants? Oecologia 51: 133-144.Google Scholar
  10. Enright, N. J., Lamont, B. B. & Marsula R. 1996. Canopy seed bank dynamics and optimum fire regime for the highly serotinous shrub, Banksia hookeriana.J. Ecol. 84: 9-17.Google Scholar
  11. Fenner, M. 1985. Seed Ecology. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  12. Freas, K. E. & Kemp, P. R. 1983. Some relationships between environmental reliability and seed dormancy in desert annual plants. J. Ecol. 71: 211-217.Google Scholar
  13. Günster, A. 1994a. Seed band dynamics-longevity, viability and predation of seeds of serotinous plants in the central Namib Desert. J. Arid Environ. 28: 195-205.Google Scholar
  14. Günster, A. 1994b. Variability in life history parameters of four serotinous plants in the Namib Desert. Vegetatio 114: 149-160.Google Scholar
  15. Gutterman, Y. 1972. Delayed seed dispersal and rapid germination as survival mechanisms of the desert plant Blepharis persica(Burm.) Kuntze. Oecologia 10: 145-149.Google Scholar
  16. Gutterman, Y. 1991. Strategies of Seed Dispersal and Germination in Plants Inhabiting Deserts. Bot. Rev. 60: 277-317.Google Scholar
  17. Gutterman, Y. 1993. Seed Germination in Desert Plants. SpringerVerlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  18. Gutterman, Y. & Ginott, S. 1994. Long-term protected' seed bank' in dry inflorescences of Asteriscus pygmaeus; achene dispersal mechanism and germination. J. Arid Environ. 26: 149-163.Google Scholar
  19. Gutterman, Y., Witztum A., & Evenari, M. 1967. Seed dispersal and germination in Blepharis persica(Burm.) Kuntze. Israel J. Bot. 16: 213-234.Google Scholar
  20. Harper, J. L. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Inouye, R. S., Byers, G. S., & Brown, J. H. 1980. Effects of predation and competition on survivorship, fecundity, and community structure of desert annuals. Ecology 61: 1344-1351.Google Scholar
  22. Jurado, E. & Westoby, M. 1992a. Germination biology of selected central Australian plants. Aust. J. Ecol. 17: 341-348.Google Scholar
  23. Jurado, E. & Westoby, M. 1992b. Seedling growth in relation to seed size among species of arid Australia. J. Ecol. 80: 407-416.Google Scholar
  24. Kalisz, S. & McPeek, M. A. 1993. Extinction dynamics, population growth and seed banks: An example using an age-structured annual. Oecologia 95: 314-320.Google Scholar
  25. Lamont, B. B., Le Maitre, D. C., Cowling, R. M., & Enlight, N. J. 1991. Canopy Seed Storage in Woody Plants. Bot. Rev. 57: 277-317.Google Scholar
  26. Leishman, M. R. & Westoby, M. 1994. The role of seed size in seedling establishment in dry soil conditions-experimental evidence from semi-arid species. J. Ecol. 82: 249-258.Google Scholar
  27. Morse, D. H. & Schmitt, J. 1985. Propagule size, dispersal ability, and seedling performance in Asclepias syriaca. Oecologia 67: 372-379.Google Scholar
  28. Mares, M. A. & Rosenzweig, M. L. 1978. Granivory in north and south American deserts: rodents, birds, and ants. Ecology 59: 235-241.Google Scholar
  29. Morton, S. R. 1985. Granivory in arid regions: comparison of Australia with North and South America. Ecology 66: 1859-1866.Google Scholar
  30. Pake, C. E. & Venable, D. L. 1996. Seed banks in desert annuals: implications for persistence and coexistence in variable environments. Ecology 77: 1427-1435.Google Scholar
  31. Philippi, T. & Seger, J. 1989. Hedging one's evolutionary bets, revisited. Tr. Ecol. Evol. 4: 41-44.Google Scholar
  32. Reader, R. J. 1993. Control of seedling emergence by ground cover and seed predation in relation to seed size for some old-field species. J. Ecol. 81: 169-175.Google Scholar
  33. Reichman, O. J. 1979. Desert granivore foraging and its impact on seed densities and distributions. Ecology 60: 1085-1092.Google Scholar
  34. Shanker, V. 1983. Depleted vegetation of the desertic habitat: Study on its natural regeneration. CAZRI Monograph 21: 1-30.Google Scholar
  35. Tevis, L., Jr. 1958. Interrelations between the harvester ants Veromessor pergandei(Mayr) and some desert ephemerals. Ecology 39: 695-704.Google Scholar
  36. Venable, D. L. & Levin, D. A. 1985. Ecology of achene dimorphism in Heterotheca latifolia. J. Ecol. 73: 133-145.Google Scholar
  37. Wada, N., Narita, K., Kumar, S., & Furukawa, A. 1995 Impact of overgrazing on seed predation by rodents in the Thar desert, northwestern India. Ecol. Res. 10: 217-221.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenji Narita
    • 1
  • Naoya Wada
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations