Plant Ecology

, Volume 138, Issue 1, pp 89–96 | Cite as

The influence of soil depth on plant species response to grazing within a semi-arid savanna

  • Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
  • Fred E. Smeins


Grassland patches within a semi-arid savanna were evaluated over 45-years for (1) local temporal dynamics of basal area for five dominant grass species within long-term heavily grazed and ungrazed treatments, (2) the influence of soil depth (resource availability) on vegetation dynamics, and (3) the applicability of community-level grazing response groups over fine-scale patterns of soil heterogeneity. Temporal patterns in species composition and basal area were dependent upon soil depth. In the heavy grazed treatment, Hilaria belangeri dominated deep soils while Erioneuron pilosum and Bouteloua trifida were restricted to shallow soils. In the ungrazed treatment, removal of grazing resulted in successional changes that were significantly different across soil depths. After 45 years without grazing, Eriochloa sericea was most abundant on deep soils while Bouteloua curtipendula was more abundant on intermediate and shallow soils. Community-level functional groups that are based on grazing were not appropriate when multiple pattern-driving variables were considered across multiple scales indicating that functional groups should only be applied to certain processes at specific scales. Within the ungrazed treatments, variable soil depths have resulted in a shifting mosaic in time and space where early- and late-successional species co-exist continuously but spatially separated within the community. In the heavily grazed treatment, species are somewhat spatially arranged by soil depths, but much of the inherent heterogeneity is eliminated and species composition is dominated by the three grazing-resistant short-grasses. Broad scale successional changes may appear linear and predictable while at finer scales, the same changes may be described as non-linear and dependent upon soil depth resulting in thresholds that are partially explained by weather patterns, seed bank limitations and competitive inhibitions.

Ecology Functional groups Diversity Herbivory Heterogeneity Patch dynamics Pattern Plant-animal interaction Rangelands Redundancy Scale Shifting mosaic Succession 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Addicott, J. F., Aho, J. M., Antolin, M. F., Padilla, D. K., Richardson, J. S. & Soluk, D. A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. F. H. & Hoekstra, T. W. 1992. Toward a unified ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Dyksterhuis, E. J. 1949. Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. J. Range Manage. 2: 104–105.Google Scholar
  4. Fuhlendorf, S. D. 1996. Multi-scale vegetation responses to long-term herbivory and weather variation on the Edwards Plateau, Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. Rangeland Ecology and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  5. Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Smeins, F. E. 1996. Spatial scale influence on long-term temporal patterns of a semi-arid grassland. Landscape Ecology 11: 107–113.Google Scholar
  6. Fuhlendorf, S. D., Smeins, F. E. & Grant, W. E. 1996. Simulation of a fire-sensitive ecological threshold: a case study of Ashe juniper on the Edwards Plateau of Texas, USA. Ecol. Model. 90: 245- 255.Google Scholar
  7. Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Smeins, F. E. 1997. Long-term importance of grazing, fire, and weather patterns on Edwards Plateau vegetation change. Pp. 7.19–7.20. In: Taylor, C. A. (ed.), Proceedings of Juniper Symposium. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Report 97–1, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Fuhlendorf, S. D., Smeins, F. E. & Taylor, C. A. 1997. Browsing and tree size influences on Ashe juniper understory. J. Range Manage. 50: 507–512.Google Scholar
  9. Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Smeins, F. E. 1997. Long-term vegetation dynamics mediated by herbivores, weather and fire in a Juniperus-Quercussavanna. J. Veg. Sci. 8: 819–828.Google Scholar
  10. Fuhlendorf, S. D., Smeins, F. E. & Briske, D. D. (Unpubl. Manu.). Herbaceous vegetation change in a semi-arid savanna: is grazing or climate variability the primary change agent? Ecological Applications (accepted and revised).Google Scholar
  11. Hatch, S. L., Gandhi, K. N., & Brown, L.E. 1990. Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Texas. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station MP-1655, College Station TX, USA.Google Scholar
  12. Herbel, C. H., Ares, F. N. & Wright, R. A. 1972. Drought effects on a semi-dessert grassland. Ecology 53: 1084–1093.Google Scholar
  13. Hinesley, H. E. 1986. Multivariate environmental classification of permanent vegetation plots within a Low Stony Hill Range Site on the Texas Agricultural Experiment Station at Sonora. M.S. Thesis, Dept. Rangeland Ecology andManagement, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  14. Inouye, R. S. & Tilman, D. 1995. Convergence and divergence of old-field vegetation after 11 yr of nitrogen addition. Ecology 76: 1872–1887.Google Scholar
  15. Kinucan, R. J. 1987. Influence of soil seed bank, seed rain inhibition competition and site disturbance on successional processes within three long-term grazing regimes on the Edwards Plateau of Texas. Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. Rangeland Ecology and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  16. Kinucan, R. J. & Smeins, F. E. 1992. Soil seed bank of a semi-arid grassland under three long-term grazing regimes. Am.Midl. Nat. 128: 11–21.Google Scholar
  17. Kotilar, N. B. & Wiens, J. A. 1990. Multiple scale of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.Google Scholar
  18. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. The potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States. American Geographical Society, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Ludwig, J. A. & Tongway, D. J. 1995. Spatial organisation of landscapes and its function in semi-arid woodlands, Australia. Landscape Ecology 10: 51–63.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, R. E., Ver Hoef, J. M. & Fowler, N. L. 1996. Spatial heterogeneity in eight central Texas grasslands. J. Ecol. 83: 919–928.Google Scholar
  21. O'Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B. & Allen T. F. H. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.Google Scholar
  22. O'Neill, R. V., Turner, S. J., Cullinan, V. I., Coffin, D. P., Cook, T., Conley, W., Brunt, J., Thomas, J. M., Conley, M. R. & Gosz, J. 1991. Multiple landscapes scales: An intersite comparison. Landsc. Ecol. 5: 137–144.Google Scholar
  23. Patten, R. S. & Ellis, J. E. 1995. Patterns of species and community distributions related to environmental gradients in an arid tropical ecosystem. Vegetatio 117: 69–79.Google Scholar
  24. Schimel, D. S., Kittel, T. G. F., Knapp, A. K., Seastedt, T. R., Parton, W. J. & Brown, V. B. 1991. Physiological interactions along resource gradients in a tallgrass prairie. Ecology 72: 672–684.Google Scholar
  25. Smeins, F. E. & Merrill, L. B. 1988. Long-term change in semiarid grassland. Pp. 101–114. In: Amos, B. B. & Gehlbach, F. R. (eds), Edwards Plateau Vegetation. Baylor Univ. Press. Waco, TX. USA.Google Scholar
  26. Smeins, F. E., Fuhlendorf, S. D. & Taylor, C. A. 1997. Environmental and land use change: A long-term perspective. Pp. 1.3–1.21. In: Taylor, C.A. (ed.), Proceedings of Juniper Symposium. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Technical Report 97–1, College Station, TX, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, T. & Huston, M. 1989. A theory of spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio 83: 49–69.Google Scholar
  28. Stahle, D. W. & Cleaveland, M. K. 1988. Texas Drought history reconstructed and analyzed from 1698 to 1980. J. Climate 1: 59- 74.Google Scholar
  29. Stroup, W. W. & Stubbendieck, J. 1983. Multivariate Statistical Methods to determine changes in botanical composition. J. Range Manage. 36: 208–211.Google Scholar
  30. Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Cons. Biol. 18–23.Google Scholar
  31. Watt, A. S. 1947. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35: 1–22.Google Scholar
  32. Whittaker, R. H. 1953. A consideration of climax theory: The climax as a population and pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 23: 41–78.Google Scholar
  33. Wiedenfeld, C. C. & McAndrew, J. D. 1968. Soil survey of Sutton County, Texas. Soil Conservation Service, U.S.G.P.O., Wash. DC, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, S. D. & Tilman, D. 1993. Plant competition and resource availability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74: 599–611.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
  • Fred E. Smeins

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations