Foundations of Science

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 463–482 | Cite as

The Prospects for Machine Discovery in Linguistics

  • Vladimir Pericliev


The article reports the results from the developmentof four data-driven discovery systems, operating inlinguistics. The first mimics the induction methods ofJohn Stuart Mill, the second performs componentialanalysis of kinship vocabularies, the third is ageneral multi-class discrimination program, and thefourth finds logical patterns in data. These systemsare briefly described and some arguments are offeredin favour of machine linguistic discovery. Thearguments refer to the strength of machines incomputationally complex tasks, the guaranteedconsistency of machine results, the portability ofmachine methods to new tasks and domains, and thepotential machines provide for our gaining newinsights.

linguistic machine discovery scientific discovery prospects for computational discovery 


  1. Cherry, C., M. Halle and R. Jakobson: 1953, Toward the Logical Description of Languages in their Phonemic Aspect. Language 29: 34-47.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
  3. Greenberg, J.: 1966, Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In J. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 58-90.Google Scholar
  4. Hawkins, J.: 1983, Word Order Universals. N.Y.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hanson, N.: 1958, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Langley, P., H. Simon, P. Bradshaw and J. Zytkow: 1987, Scientific Discovery: Computational Investigation of the Creative Process. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Lounsbury, F.: 1964, The Structural Analysis of Kinship Semantics. In Horace Lunt (ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists. Mouton: The Hague, 1073-1090.Google Scholar
  8. Mill, J.S.: 1879, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
  9. Newell, A. and H. Simon: 1972, Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980a, Scientific Discovery I: Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  11. Nickles, T. (ed.): 1980b, Scientific Discovery II: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  12. Nogle, L.: 1974, Method and Theory in Semantics and Cognition of Kinship Terminology. Mouton: The Hague and Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Pericliev, V.: 1990, On Heuristic Procedures in Linguistics. Studia Linguistica 44: 59-69.Google Scholar
  14. Pericliev, V.: 1995, Empirical Discovery in Linguistics. In Working Notes of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence Spring Symposium Series “Systematic Methods of Scientific Discovery”. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 68-73.Google Scholar
  15. Pericliev, V.: 1996, Machine Scientific Discovery and the Domain Sciences: Invited Response to “Computer Science Research in Scientific Discovery”. Knowledge Engineering Review 11: 67-68.Google Scholar
  16. Pericliev, V. and Raúl Valdés-Pérez: 1998a, A Discovery System for Componential Analysis of Kinship Terminologies. In B. Caron (ed.), Actes du 16è Congrès International des Linguistes (Paris, 20–25 juillet 1997). Published by Pergamon/Elsevier on CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  17. Pericliev, V. and Raúl Valdés-Pérez: 1998b, A Procedure for Multi-class Discrimination and Some Linguistic Applications. In COLING, Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (August 10–14), Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1036-1042.Google Scholar
  18. Pericliev, V. and Raúl Valdés-Pérez: 1998c, Automatic Componential Analysis of Kinship Vocabularies with a Proposed Structural Solution to the Problem of Multiple Models. Anthropological Linguistics 40: 272-317.Google Scholar
  19. Shrager, J. and P. Langley (eds.): 1990, Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  20. Valdés-Pérez, R. and V. Pericliev: 1997, Maximally Parsimonious Discrimination: A Task from Linguistic Discovery. In Proceedings of the 14th US National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI97. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 515-520.Google Scholar
  21. Valdés-Pérez, R. and V. Pericliev: 1999, Computer Enumeration of Significant Universals of Kinship Terminology. Cross-Cultural Research 33: 162-174.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir Pericliev
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics and InformaticsBulgarian Academy of SciencesSofiaBulgaria E-mail

Personalised recommendations