Tertiary Education and Management

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 19–36 | Cite as

Developing a Quality Culture in Higher Educaiton

  • Mantz Yorke


Although quality and qualityassurance have become embedded into the discourse ofhigher education, the development of a quality culturewithin higher education has (paradoxically) laggedbehind the implementation of quality assurancepractices. Part of the paradox, as far as learningand teaching are concerned, can be attributed toexternal demands which are homeostatic, when thefuture of higher education seems to be needing aradical commitment to curricular development. Thispaper sets the development of a quality culture in apolitical context, explains the relevance of single-and double-loop learning, argues for a conception ofmanaging for quality, identifies some aspects ofinstitutional dysfunctioning, lays out some qualitiesof a learning organisation, and suggests some ways inwhich institutional leaders might approach the task ofdeveloping a quality culture.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argyris, C. (1990). Overcoming Organizational Defenses. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching Smart People to Learn. Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 99–109.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C. (1999). On Organizational Learning, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C. & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Barnett, R. (1992). Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baty, P. (1999a). A Quality Game Where Cheating is Allowed? The Times Higher Education Supplement No. 1375 (12 March), pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  7. Baty, P. (1999b). Encounters of an Unfair Kind. The Times Higher Education Supplement No. 1376 (19 March), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  8. Beatty, R.W. & Ulrich, D.O. (1991). Re-energizing the Mature Organization. Organizational Dynamics, Summer, pp. 16–30.Google Scholar
  9. Belbin, M. (1981). Management Teams: Why They Succeed or Fail. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  10. Bennis, W. & Townsend, R. (1996). Reinventing Leadership. London: Judy Piatkus.Google Scholar
  11. Bligh, D. (1998). What's the Use of Lectures? Exeter: Intellect.Google Scholar
  12. Burnes, B. (1992). Managing Change: A Strategic Approach to Organisational Development. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron, K. & Smart, J. (1998).Maintaining Effectiveness Amid Downsizing and Decline in Institutions of Higher education. Research in Higher Education 39(1), 65–86.Google Scholar
  14. Cameron, K.S., Whetten, D.A. & Kim, M.U. (1987). Organizational Dysfunctions of Decline. Academy of Management Journal 30, 126–138.Google Scholar
  15. Carvel, J. (1999). Sacrificial Lamb? The Guardian Higher (20 July), pp. ii–iii.Google Scholar
  16. Daniel, J. (1996). Mega-universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  17. Dolence, M.G. & Norris, D.M. (1995). Transforming Higher Education: A Vision for Learning in the 21st Century. Ann Arbor, MI: Society for College and University Planning.Google Scholar
  18. Gaither, G.H. (ed) (1998). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: An International Perspective [New Directions for Institutional Research No. 99]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, L. & Knight, P.T. (1996). Transforming Higher Education. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. HEFCE (1999). Performance Indicators in Higher Education [First Report of the Performance Indicators Steering Group, No. 99/11]. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  21. Holloway, D.G. (1994). Total Quality Management, the Learning Organisation and Postcompulsory Education. Vocational Aspects of Education 46(2), 117–130.Google Scholar
  22. Kotter, J. (1990). A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kotter, J. (1996). Leading Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  24. McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. McKenna, K., Forde, P., Wyber, J. & Crelin, M. (1999). Developing a Quality Review Process for Offshore Programs. Paper presented at the 21st Annual EAIR Forum, Lund, Sweden, 22–25 August (mimeo).Google Scholar
  26. Middlehurst, R. (1993). Leading Academics. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Morgan, C. & Murgatroyd, S. (1994). Total Quality Management in the Public Sector. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. NCIHE (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society [Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education]. Norwich, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  29. Neave, G. (1998). The Evaluative State Reconsidered. European Journal of Education 33(3), 265–284.Google Scholar
  30. Nilsson, K-A. & Wahlén, S. (1999). Institutional Response to the Swedish Model of Quality Assurance. Paper presented at the 21st Annual EAIR Forum, Lund, Sweden, 22–25 August.Google Scholar
  31. Oblinger, D.G. & Rush, S.C. (eds) (1997). The Learning Revolution: The Challenge of Information Technology in the Academy. Bolton, MA: Anker.Google Scholar
  32. QAA (1997). Subject Review Handbook, October 1998 to September 2000. Bristol: Quality Assurance Agency.Google Scholar
  33. Senge, P. (1992). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Century Business.Google Scholar
  34. Stensaker, B. (1999). Quality as Discourse: An Analysis of External Audit Reports in Sweden 1995–1998. Paper presented at the 21st Annual EAIR Forum, Lund, Sweden, 22–25 August.Google Scholar
  35. Stephenson, J. & Yorke, M. (eds) (1998). Capability and Quality in Higher Rducation.London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, P.G. (1998). Institutional Change in Uncertain Times: Lone Ranging Is not Enough. Studies in Higher Education 23(3), 269–279.Google Scholar
  37. Trowler (1998). Academics Responding to Change: New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. UNESCO (1995). Policy Paper for Change and Development in Higher Education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  39. Weick, K.E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely-coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 22(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank (1994). Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  41. Yorke, M. (1993). Quality Assurance for Higher Education Franchising. Higher Education 26, 167–182.Google Scholar
  42. Yorke, M. (1994). Enhancement-led Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education 2(3), 6–12.Google Scholar
  43. Yorke, M. (1996a). Shouldn't Quality be Enhanced, Rather than Assessed? Tertiary Education and Management 2(1), 86–94.Google Scholar
  44. Yorke, M. (1996b). The Use of Funding to Encourage Quality in Academic Programmes: Some Lessons from Experience, and Their Applicability. Quality in Higher Education 2(1), 33–44.Google Scholar
  45. Yorke, M. (1997). The Elusive Quarry: Total Quality in Higher Education. Tertiary Education and Management 3(2), 145–156.Google Scholar
  46. Yorke, M. (1999). Assuring Quality and Standards in Globalised Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education 7(1), 14–24.Google Scholar
  47. Yorke, M., McCormick, D. & Chapman, T. (1996). HE 2005+: Towards a Sectoral Strategy for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education Institutions [A report of a policy-oriented workshop commissioned by the HEFCE]. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mantz Yorke
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Higher Education DevelopmentLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations